Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Thoroughly convinced that there's nothing a man can do that won't give women the ick.

I've come to this conclusion after a long dialogue with a single femoid; sorry fellow moids we just can't win.

Like video games? Thats ok! Just don't like them too much, no I will not define too much.
Like cars? Thats ok! Just don't like them too much, no I will not define too much.
Like sports? Thats ok! Just don't like them too much, no I will not define too much.
Like literally anything? Thats ok! Just don't like literally anything too much, no I will not define too much.

If you're passionate about anything, even edifying/constructive/creative things like writing, going to the gym, wood working, literally anything, then you register on the ick scale. Fairly certain women just find men utterly revolting writ large. Like they'll look at an ordinary dude, probably a swell guy, and he'll like Magic the Gathering or something, so then all of the sudden he's icky. Like nigga! Can a guy not have hobbies?

Because of this revelation I've decided to disregard any and every opinion women give to me; their fickle nature ensures that they have nothing of value to contribute outside of vague sentiments and "emotions"(Which they are bad at expressing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
just be this
1681389907794497.jpg
 
Since you find it objectionable for people to have opinions about things they can't control, I take it you have no opinions about things you can't control, like war in Ukraine
wars happen all the time. you are not going to convince white people to disenfranchise their women because they are not arab rape apes. such an event would probably signal the downfall of the country in any event, see previous comments about the self sufficiency board. also, you may recall an event in vietnam that would beg to differ with you. some people who had so many opinions about that war are actually still alive today, and could tell you all about it.
Nigga, the Taliban is trying to ban women from speaking in public. Regardless of how possible, moronic, or feasible that is. These are people with genuine institutional power that we never thought would be achieved again. Yet here we are. I don't think anyone has a right at this point to say the word "Never". Time has a nasty habit of treating the word "Never" like a sloppy one night stand whore.
sorry I thought we were talking about americans and their voting habits, not some desert rat pedophiles. thanks for drawing attention to those people though, two sides of the same coin indeed.
 
wars happen all the time. you are not going to convince white people to disenfranchise their women because they are not arab rape apes. such an event would probably signal the downfall of the country in any event, see previous comments about the self sufficiency board. also, you may recall an event in vietnam that would beg to differ with you. some people who had so many opinions about that war are actually still alive today, and could tell you all about it.

You said you had several plans to change American society that you, personally were capable of executing. Strange that when called on it, you couldn't name any, and rambled about nonsense instead.

That was what I was expecting, of course. Nobody who whines that people shouldn't have opinions about government policy unless they can personally change it actually holds that standard consistently. It's just a cop-out to try and end an argument you can't win.
 
You said you had several plans to change American society that you, personally were capable of executing. Strange that when called on it, you couldn't name any, and rambled about nonsense instead.

That was what I was expecting, of course. Nobody who whines that people shouldn't have opinions about government policy unless they can personally change it actually holds that standard consistently. It's just a cop-out to try and end an argument you can't win.
Why would I tell a lunatic who thinks women (especially white women) shouldn't vote about my own life? You compared it to other things you thought ridiculous and I pointed out how people's opinions about wars have changed the course of society as an example of why you were wrong to bring them up. This demonstrates your fallacious reasoning. I'm not arguing with you about it, I'm calling you insane. You should just call up Fuentes and get a position in AFPAC if you hate women so much, he could really use your sophistry skills to preach his homosexual message.
 
Why would I tell a lunatic who thinks women (especially white women) shouldn't vote about my own life? You compared it to other things you thought ridiculous and I pointed out how people's opinions about wars have changed the course of society as an example of why you were wrong to bring them up. This demonstrates your fallacious reasoning. I'm not arguing with you about it, I'm calling you insane. You should just call up Fuentes and get a position in AFPAC if you hate women so much, he could really use your sophistry skills to preach his homosexual message.
You should probably calm down, you sound hysterical.
 
Why would I tell a lunatic who thinks women (especially white women) shouldn't vote about my own life?
Starting to think you actually aren't doing anything and have no plans.

I pointed out how people's opinions about wars have changed the course of society
The only individual person whose personal opinion turned into a plan of action to end the war in Vietnam was Richard Nixon. Nobody else had a plan of action to execute.

Your position, stated earlier, is that unless you personally have a plan of action to turn your opinion into social change, you have no business expressing it.

I brought up war because unless you are Donald J Trump, you have no power to implement a plan to start or end any war in the world. By your own standards, you're not entitled to an opinion about any war.
 
If they can kill their children unilaterally why do they get upset if the father abandons the child unilaterally?
Because women's entire existence revolves around a man footing the bill for them, and they unironically think a man is defective if he doesn't want to foot the bill for some specific woman, or women in general.

Fairly certain women just find men utterly revolting writ large. Like they'll look at an ordinary dude, probably a swell guy, and he'll like Magic the Gathering or something, so then all of the sudden he's icky. Like nigga! Can a guy not have hobbies?
Men look for things to make a woman attractive to them. Women look for things to make a man unattractive to them. When you are a woman, men come looking for you, so you get it in your head you get to be very picky and very nonsensical in that pickiness.

I always did wonder how much porn women read with it being too obvious
What the fuck is nodding, and how does it involve a dog? And why is it in a book at kid height!

since I don't aspire to repeal constitutional amendments and treat 50% of the population as second class citizens,
Men are already second class citizens in the United States. Every man in my family, including myself, has had an obligation placed on his right to vote that no woman in my family has ever had to meet. Nor any woman I've ever met, seen, or heard about, who is also a US citizen. The draft exists, it isn't going away, ever. So the question is simple: if one sex has to be the second class, which one? Personally, and in the interest of preserving this nation, it ought to be the one that isn't expected to carry a rifle when the national need arises. Cause as things currently stand, we as a nation are gonna find a lot of young men who are going to tell the draft board to go fuck itself come the next time.
 
Men are already second class citizens in the United States. Every man in my family, including myself, has had an obligation placed on his right to vote that no woman in my family has ever had to meet. Nor any woman I've ever met, seen, or heard about, who is also a US citizen. The draft exists, it isn't going away, ever. So the question is simple: if one sex has to be the second class, which one? Personally, and in the interest of preserving this nation, it ought to be the one that isn't expected to carry a rifle when the national need arises. Cause as things currently stand, we as a nation are gonna find a lot of young men who are going to tell the draft board to go fuck itself come the next time.
It's amazing how women use sexual dimorphism as an excuse as to why this is acceptable while also insisting that they should still be allowed to vote. Somehow, there are no meaningful differences between men and women except for this one: the one where it'd be most disadvantageous to a woman if it were not to. They base most character judgements off appearances, but they who look vulnerable and absent-minded are not. They are your equal yet must retain special access to occupations with very little actual labor to them that pay an exorbitant amount of money for what they actually provide. Whatever child growing in her belly is yours if she says it is and dead if she doesn't want it. Never mind the differences between crime sentencing between men and women.

Women are the weaker/lesser sex, the subservient sex if any of you are one of those pussies about ever saying what is self-evident because it's not politically correct. Once you accept this, you'll find most of your frustrations with women are their constant denial that they are women. You can take their ridiculous projected insecurities, their obvious double standards, and their utterly nonsensical emotional acts, but it's the denial they do this on a regular goddamn fucking basis that triggers the male reptilian brain. It is them implicitly saying "I am not a woman," as they behave in the one way only women of all people can without being ridiculed for.

You do not say you are equal while saying you are inferior in the same breath, for Jesus fucking Christ's sake.
 
Back