- Joined
- Jun 1, 2020
That's why I don't really agree with the far more fanatical views some of you guys take (not you, personally, Sprate, but the other users).I'm definitely biased here, as I've been cool with Mrow, but I'm gonna disagree on this one.
Maybe I missed something from the video(s), but the proof Slimebeast has of Mrow being an "ethical loli enjoyer" seemingly consists entirely of a chat message where Mrow said he didn't care about loli being viewed "for research purposes" because they aren't actual CSAM. Obviously, saying something is for "research purposes" is a bit of a joke at this point, but considering that Mrow makes documentaries about lolicon pedophiles like SonicOwO (which have been particularly helpful for my research for my VRChat OP), I think he was being literal, in the same way that users of this thread have probably been exposed to loli while digging for dirt on loli defenders. That part of Slimebeast's video comes across to me like the journos who tried to use Null's hosting of the raw Zoosadism Leaks to try and imply Kiwi Farms was pro-animal abuse: a purely bad faith attempt to morally smear someone they're in a petty beef with.
If there's more evidence I haven't seen, or something more damning that I missed from Slimebeast's videos, I'm open to reconsidering, but right now, I'm not convinced.
Yes, you should be cautious about certain patterns of behavior. I don't believe you should go jumping at every single shadow on the wall, though, nor making these near schizo rhetoric posts armchair analyzing behaviors to support your bias.
I forewarn about this because there's also plenty of cases where the staunchest, most vocal "anti-lolicon" people have also turned out to be in possession of CSAM and much worse shit themselves. Trust nothing if it isn't otherwise verified and proven.