Well, I mean, he mocked Keffals. Let's not get ridiculous.
Keffals cooked a decent pasta dish (he's Italian), never had a child test positive for cocaine, but was also adjacent to gross nonces and potentially a groomer himself; with the collars and shit.
Weighing the various criterion, I think skelly slightly better. He deserves a sticker for this, alongside the ones for his daughter not testing positive for cocaethylene and norcocaine.
Ron did himself no favors saying "I'd rather be a cuck with Monica, than live without her," but I attribute that more to him being a fucking idiot, and not a confession.
I don't know, it just sounds like he's simping for his ex/girlfriend whatever, where he thought the emotional bond was tighter than it really is.
Unless he watched other men or women fuck his wife, he's not a cuck. I'd agree it's a foolish arrangement of words and makes him sound pathetic.
Wait, how many balldos does he own?
He had a grey one as well, it was Drexel's which he claimed wasn't used (big X to doubt). Drexel got it back I think.
Imagine this, at some point he had TWO of these devices lying around. I'd love to be a specter in the walls to see what happened.
Actually, no. I take that back.
Yeah that's the thing, if it was just over or around the cut off, I could maybe buy "accidental" exposure, but ten fucking times the cut off??
How the fuck do you pop a 10 times the cut off dose, a level that indicates regular or habitual use by accident?
This is a hair test, not a piss test, so that level is accumulated over a period of time, it's not just one large dose, what she "accidentally" managed to get into his stuff multiple times?
I know that 10x the reference value seems very high, but it really depends on the tests. Some tests consider 10x the reference value as nothing, while others see 2x as a huge difference. So, I think it’s better to leave this kind of analysis to people who really understand the interpretation well.
I'm going to collate everything I've written on the subject in one big post later. I might even get an old colleague to proofread it, I'm not skelly and his paedophile friends and I don't want to spread disinformation.
In general, x10 the cutoff will not come from contamination. The lab that tested these samples have a decontamination protocol that they used which works very well according to the papers I've read (in full, not just the abstract). With their protocol, rates that indicate heavy use dropped to somewhere above the ordinary cutoff at 150pg/mg at the maxima. <150pg/mg is used for average workers. Public servants require <100pg/mg and medical staff are at <300pg/mg. 500 is used for the general public.
They also retest the sample in the case of a child.
>5000pg/mg (greater than) just will not happen with skelly's delusional glove story. I'm not sure why it's >5000 rather than an actual number like 4572. However, if you think about it, it will send shivers down your spine. Perhaps the test they ran had a determination of only up to 5000. Generally, a smaller range gives higher resolution, it could just be 0-5000pg/mg for this test that's able to discriminate between a tenth of a picogram. >5000pg/mg could be 10,000 or even more, ie beyond the GC-MS configuration.
The way cocaine interacts in a child's system isn't well know, because, well, we can't ethically evaluate this. We can't just gather a bunch of children that uses cocaine to see how the drug interacts with their system. Based on this, I think the police will not be perusing action. They can already pin child endangerment on the qover because they had loose firearms and cocaine around children.
