The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
wasn't nigel farage arguing that we cannot deport any of these "people" a couple of weeks ago, he's cleary controlled opposition.
He said that it is not politically possible and that if he even uttered the words "mass deportation" it would be front page etc. He is correct, for now in the UK re-migration is not a realistic policy, I think Trump will shift the entire western window rightwards as will the continuing problems with dune coons. I'm pinning it as realpolitiks and just Nigel not being a sperg about this, I expect as the west continues to shift rightwards re-migration will move into mainstream.
 
The real motivation isn't about taxing wealth, anyway. It's about asserting control.
Why is it everytime a left wing government tries to make things more equal/fair it's always through regressive measures like jacking up VAT freezing income thresholds and literally taking the family farm?
This is a dangerously pinko suggestion but how fucking hard would it be to just flat wealth tax? We know the landowners who own absolutely everything can afford it because it's all public record, yet it's me having to give up 20% of my £12,500 and not them shaving a an irrelevant few 0's off their 0000000000's in fact they ad few more because CGT for some reason still doesn't match income tax which permits them to profit off corporate fuckery.
The media does an excellent job of redirecting hate and disgust towards the underclass but the real enemy will always be the ever shrinking self-eating richfags.
He is correct, for now in the UK re-migration is not a realistic policy
The Rwanda plan was retarded but the fact the idea of it had popular support is a bit of a tiny watershed, like with how Australia was evul and raycist for stopping the boats until it actually worked and now it's just accepted as necessary, if we ever make friends with France again I wouldn't be surprised if the Normandy beaches start getting re-used for landing purposes.
 
Just another reminder of how awful the British government is.
Screenshot_1833.png
 
The Rwanda plan was retarded but the fact the idea of it had popular support is a bit of a tiny watershed, like with how Australia was evul and raycist for stopping the boats until it actually worked and now it's just accepted as necessary, if we ever make friends with France again I wouldn't be surprised if the Normandy beaches start getting re-used for landing purposes.
It's coming. America is about to show the entire world that actually: you can just deport them all.
Once mass migration occurs in America you are going to see it spread like wildfire in my humble opinion. Le Pen is also on her way to the presidency in France, She is pro deportation and has stated she will assist the UK in deportations.
Be a positive polly, change is coming.
 
I'm not optimistic. Nothing's going to change without very extreme - and widespread - irl fedposting. It's delusional to believe we can vote our way out of this. And who wants to pull a Tarrant or go full Breivik (because that's what it would take) for the sake of retarded, brainwashed, niggercattle normies, who'd only condemn such actions anyway.
 
I'm just going to preface this by saying that I'm an American, so I know my opinions here are pretty useless, but...

The more I learn about the British "justice system" the more I despise the judges and prosecutors in that country. They're genuinely subhuman and I personally feel that every last one of them should be lynched or given a South African Tire Necklace.

I have a close friend who's family has been the victim of the british courts, where a judge blocked exculpatory evidence because it would be "prejudicial", blocked several defense witnesses from being able to testify, blocked VIDEO EVIDENCE OF THE SUPPOSED VICTIM LAUGHING AND ADMITTING THAT THEY MADE UP THE ACCUSATIONS, and according to my friend, mocked her when she testified (And from everything I've read about the British courts, I 100% believe her) and insulted her and other members of her family when he sentenced her family member.

Apparently the judge is relatively high profile thanks to some cases he's been involved with, so he felt that he had the right to act like that. Because being a man with a mouth full of rotting teeth who wears a yarn wig and wear a dress and can force people to call him "honorable" because some decrepit cunt vaguely related to greater men who lived six centuries ago (The Queen) gave him his job makes him worthy of respect, or something. In fact, he was so out-of-line with his antics that when the British equivalent of those law firms that try to get miscarriages of justice overturned requested the court transcripts, he apparently shit himself and tried to block them from getting them, and when that failed, tried to have them edited (this also failed).

Anyhow. This is a bit of a long winded way of saying that "British judges are literally satan and they deserve nothing less than a painful, humiliating death" and that I hope that the british people make that a reality, and soon.
 
The more I learn about the British "justice system" the more I despise the judges and prosecutors in that country. They're genuinely subhuman and I personally feel that every last one of them should be lynched or given a South African Tire Necklace.
You're lucky you're not a subject of the British judiciary, or you'd be sentenced to 10 years and 20 released brown pedophiles for inciting racial hatred against the British judiciary, much like Rachel Halliwell's son (and probably her, soon enough).
 
You're lucky you're not a subject of the British judiciary,
America has many problems, with the American justice system being a joke (Look what they're doing to that dude who saved a bunch of people from an insane black dude on the subway) but as someone who grew up with the 1st Amendment being widely considered the single most important right in our society, it shocks me that our "Cousins" and "Closest Ally" with a "Shared Culture" have no concept of it - To the point where they threatened to try to extradite US Citizens over "Hate Speech". It shocks me, genuinely.
 
Kiwifriends, forgive me for once again indulging in rumourmongering...
But its going around twitter that Kieth Rodney Starmer represented Alphonse (Possibly Anaclet) Rudakabana in the early 00s to allow him to stay in the country. It's his human rights init.

I am attempting to verify this information as we speak.
 

Attachments

  • chief kief.jpg
    chief kief.jpg
    471.3 KB · Views: 97
I am attempting to verify this information as we speak.
He was definitely doing his best to ensure that illegals were getting full bennies back then (see also this BBC article from the day), but I can't find anything that names the migrants. The full story is that they were working illegally and suddenly claimed asylum in order to remain longer, which fits roughly with the timeline of rudakabana entering the country. You know it must be damaging to Starmer, because the debunkers went into overdrive just before the election and ensured the story wouldn't spread very far.
 
He was definitely doing his best to ensure that illegals were getting full bennies back then (see also this BBC article from the day), but I can't find anything that names the migrants. The full story is that they were working illegally and suddenly claimed asylum in order to remain longer, which fits roughly with the timeline of rudakabana entering the country. You know it must be damaging to Starmer, because the debunkers went into overdrive just before the election and ensured the story wouldn't spread very far.
Remember the olden days when when you could see an article saying something was debunked and you didn’t assume that it actually true now?

I hate clown world.
 
Kiwifriends, forgive me for once again indulging in rumourmongering...
But its going around twitter that Kieth Rodney Starmer represented Alphonse (Possibly Anaclet) Rudakabana in the early 00s to allow him to stay in the country. It's his human rights init.

I am attempting to verify this information as we speak.

https://refugeecouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/s55judgment.pdf

More information on the cases.
The Rwandan mentioned was a 42 year old woman. However,
I notice it mentions Angolans on there. It’s noted his father lived in 3 countries in the article we found earlier in the case. https://www.southportvisiter.co.uk/sport/other-sport/alphonse-gets-wants---after-9480939

Is it a coincidence that there is A Rwandan ambassador in Angola called Charles Rudakabana?

IMG_2767.jpeg
This is the problem we we let in people via other countries with ripped up passports.
 
Last edited:
I am unbanned fro being a faggot.-I am always a faggot.

The British justice system is fucked. Releasing pedos and terrorists yet giving year-long sentences to people who participated in protests (yes, some were violent and deserve proper sentencing). I think many of the ENGLISH posters on here are from the north. (correct me please) - I am from the south so we WILL have different experiences.
 
I am attempting to verify this information as we speak.
I have been unable to verify anything at all. The docs going around twitter dont prove anything, to my non legal eye.
Searching is hard because Rudakubana is not an entirely rare surname from rwanda, it seems. Anaclet rudakubana has been on the run since the 90s, and there is nothing proving he's a relative.
Whatever’s going on with all these rumours the Journos need to actually come out and actually say something cause these “I heard this…” stuff is annoying
Completely agree, it's beyond pathetic.
Summary:
-Isabel Oakshot alludes to there being "more to come out at trial", as if all the journos know something is going to come out that isnt going to look good for the regime, but they are bound by trial timings before releasing to the public.
-Nige on a podcast says ~"It's massive, I can't say anything"
I presume they're talking about the same thing. What the journos know, westminster will surely know and vice versa. Given oakshot mentioning the trial, I suspect it's not about the father or his immigration status, at all.
-A bunch of twitterheads saw Nige's statement and started making assumptions.

Then again, maybe it is real. Someone had to have defended this guy in 2002-2003, whether it was Starmer or not makes little difference - Bringing these people here and endangering natives was an intentional policy choice.

(There's a bloke on twitter sperging out about how Alphonse is actually Paul Kagame's top guy in Europe. That's right, the Rwandan intel ops were focused around the cardiff and southport areas. Hardly casino royale, is it?)
 
Still not found anything of substance but this is interesting. Had not realised Rwanda had made comments about Genocide criminals over here in regards to the Rwanda migrant deal. Is this why Labour was so against it?

IMG_2770.jpeg

Edit:
Cryptic but Mahyar Tousi throwing out the hints we’ve been all on the right track
IMG_2772.jpeg
 
Last edited:
This soothes my curiosity a bit.
Along with Farage hinting at bombshells on Andrew Gold, there was a young, female journo on Fr Calvin Robinson's show, saying there was serious stuff they were gagged from talking about or end up with Tommy's fate, jailed for contempt.
Seems everyone is on the same page here, and it makes a lot of sense, considering Starmer's severe and increasingly damaging overaction to the murders.
It's literally all his fault.
Not that he'll reflect on that, he did the moral thing in his own eyes, but it's the insanity of pandering to these parasites human rights writ large, condemning the highest office in the land, the supposed pinnacle of the "mother of all parliaments".
It condemns liberal democracy (symbolically, at the very least,) around the world.
What a catastrophic failure Starmer is.
 
Back