I am attempting to verify this information as we speak.
I have been unable to verify anything at all. The docs going around twitter dont prove anything, to my non legal eye.
Searching is hard because Rudakubana is not an entirely rare surname from rwanda, it seems. Anaclet rudakubana has been on the run since the 90s, and there is nothing proving he's a relative.
Whatever’s going on with all these rumours the Journos need to actually come out and actually say something cause these “I heard this…” stuff is annoying
Completely agree, it's beyond pathetic.
Summary:
-Isabel Oakshot alludes to there being "more to come out at trial", as if all the journos know something is going to come out that isnt going to look good for the regime, but they are bound by trial timings before releasing to the public.
-Nige on a podcast says ~"It's massive, I can't say anything"
I presume they're talking about the same thing. What the journos know, westminster will surely know and vice versa. Given oakshot mentioning the trial, I suspect it's not about the father or his immigration status, at all.
-A bunch of twitterheads saw Nige's statement and started making assumptions.
Then again, maybe it is real. Someone had to have defended this guy in 2002-2003, whether it was Starmer or not makes little difference - Bringing these people here and endangering natives was an intentional policy choice.
(There's a bloke on twitter sperging out about how Alphonse is actually Paul Kagame's top guy in Europe. That's right, the Rwandan intel ops were focused around the cardiff and southport areas. Hardly casino royale, is it?)