Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 21.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 106 34.8%

  • Total voters
    305
He named it the "Lord Robert Trust"?

That's not pretentious at all.
Before this gets Mandaled into lore, the house is owned by the Robert Lord trust. We don't know whether the name is in any way significant.

He probably is. He's leaning heavily on Bob, and has to sell the other house.
He's said himself that he is under financial pressure. He evicted the previous tenants and wanted to sell the house to Aaron so that financial stress pre-dates all of the current shit. Given what he paid Randazza and his greatly reduced income both prior to and after the shit hit the fan, his increased reliance on Celeste's money is a safe bet.

:story:
You can tell the remark about the Trust touched a nerve. Balldo always seethes the most when something is true. The Trust thing always sets him off because its a narcissistic injury when people are reminded that he didn't earn anything he has, it was all handed to him.

If he'd had to earn it maybe he would have valued it more, Balldo is like a lot of spoiled Trust Fund brats, silver spoon faggots have no idea of value because they didn't have to earn it. Its one thing that always triggers him because he likes to portray himself as somethjng he isn't and he hates it being pointed out that he's basically a 40+ year old manchild still suckling on mommy's cash teats.
While Bob always had a good job and Nick was never poor, his grandparents didn't come into serious money until Nick was an adult. He seems to have been raised without discipline and appropriate boundaries, but not because he was a "trust fund kid" or "born with a silver spoon".

It could also be Nick's parents telling him to sell it in the hopes Ape gets thrown out.
She's run her course and his parents might be forcing him to sell it so he has to get rid of Ape without them acknowledging he's fucking a coke whore.
Nick was trying to sell the house when Aaron and April first came on the scene, most likely to pay the mounting legal costs of the continuing Montagraph legal action.

I'm not sure why people think that Celeste and Bob are the least bit interested in holding Nick accountable.
 
From the will, Nick got no windfall from his grandfather's estate, as he (correctly) insisted. I think he said he got a small sum from his grandmother, I don't think anyone has bothered to get her will, but the purchase of the second home was made while she was still alive regardless.
Rich people generally don't want to have a huge windfall from a will because then it all goes through probate and, worse, gets taxed heavily. A lot of these trust things are to transfer wealth gradually to avoid huge single year taxable events and keep as much of that dosh as possible.

And of course, if you have an utter fuckup like Nick as a kid, to prevent him from snorting up grampa's life savings less than a year after he dies.
 
Anyone who believes he has his kids back is absolutely retarded. The only streams, like the beef jerkingoff atrocity of a cooking stream, had the grandparents there.

He can't have those kids there without supervision.
Is Kayla even there? I'm thinking Kayla and the kids may have left him.

The grandparent video talked about celebrating a kid's birthday on a day that wasn't the kid's actual birthday, something done to accommodate separated parents. It's Nick's parents bringing the kids by, not Kayla's. The Facebook post from Dan Sletta was made just before she would have left. The major Nick+Kayla fight Kiki reports would match up.

A couple weeks ago Nick started filming 2am cooking streams while noticeably intoxicated. April and Nick both suddenly materialized on Xitter with meth fueled tweets. The kitchen counter looks straight outta Hoarders. Even Kayla wouldn't risk losing her kids again, assuming she's sober.

April's tweets painted a picture that she was nowhere near Nick, painfully yearning to see him, which is something those retards would think clever if sitting right next to each other. Nick said on Molester Melton's stream that he missed April and wanted to see her. We later learned from Kiki that April's been no further than the whore shed this whole time. Wouldn't surprise me if the whole thing was to gaslight Kayla re: April's location.

rekieta.wheres.kayla..jpg
 
Could see Nick trying to allude to everyone who dares “brand him” an addict as womanly, but that clearly isn’t what he was going for, & imo, would be yet another low quality & low witted dig at his detractors.
This nasally whining, effeminate, swishy little homo calling anyone else womanly is a sick joke. One of the few funny ones he's ever told.
 
How the fuck would we be responsible for him killing himself when we spent months telling him NOT to do the absolutely fucktarded shit that put him in the situation he's in now?
He wouldn't think about killing himself or think about all the fucktarded shit he could get away with if KF didn't write about all the delicious scrumptious possibilities master criminal Nick could do, therefore we are responsible for putting them into his innocent Christian brain. (Jesus imagine if he started dressing like Saul Goodman?)
DUH!
Besides only NERDS would want a boring stable homelife instead of a coke fueled exciting adventure with the added benefit of a trustfund golden parachute to ride to the ground as everyone else dies in the wreckage.
 
His daughter testing positive for cocaine is not related to the current criminal charges against him. The endangerment charges are based solely on there being both drugs and weapons in the house where the children live and whether or not any of the children ingested cocaine isn't relevant to proving those charges.
It's definitely probative on the issue because if she tested positive, it puts the kibosh on any nonsensical fairy story Nick tells about how there were no drugs in the house ever.
Your honor, he is innocent but he defended himself in a faggy way, I motion to give this balldoskelly the death penalty.

I might be retarded but isn't one of the children testing positive for coco proof positive that the drugs were in the house with at least one of the kids present?
It's not definitive proof, but it's probative in that it makes a material fact of relevance in the case more or less likely. That's all something has to do to be probative. It doesn't have to be absolute proof by itself. It's highly probative, and not prejudicial. Even though it makes Nick and Kayla look like gargantuan scumbags and the jury will hate them, it's one of those res ipsa loquitur facts, that is, the thing speaks for itself.

There is no reasonably likely set of circumstances that lead to that positive test that don't involve outright criminal behavior by both of them.
 
He wouldn't think about killing himself or think about all the fucktarded shit he could get away with if KF didn't write about all the delicious scrumptious possibilities master criminal Nick could do, therefore we are responsible for putting them into his innocent Christian brain. (Jesus imagine if he started dressing like Saul Goodman?)
DUH!
Besides only NERDS would want a boring stable homelife instead of a coke fueled exciting adventure with the added benefit of a trustfund golden parachute to ride to the ground as everyone else dies in the wreckage.
If he starts dressing like Saul Goodman does that make Diddler Dax Nacho Varga ?
 
14 - 3 - 9 = 2 putting the date of the missed test November 2nd..
That's incredibly helpful.

It doesn't quite explain Keanu calling Nick's actions "HEINOUS!" unless that's just dabbleverse hyperbole (possibly). Nick blaming April for missing/being late to a drug test is Passive Aggressive Nick on any given day.

@Folgers Can posted about Nick's chats in Melton's stream from the 4th here. These are notable screencaps concerning the events around Nov. 2.

1731886375191.png
1731886624957.png
1731889738741.png
1731885944666.png

So, if we believe Nick, this is the chronology as well as I can piece together:
> Nov. 2 (Saturday) Nick missed/was late to a drug test, he blamed April, April called Keanu in tears (Nick does not Xeet that day)
> Nov. 3 (Sunday) The polycule watched football together.
> Nov. 4 (Monday) Nick and April are not "together" (word parsing, probably)
Melton's stream is here but I assume this was all of Nick's chats regarding the events around Nov. 2.

I've never been more confused.
Edit: Added the 3rd relevant screencap after @Balldo's Gate provided link to all of Nick's chats with timestamps. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
EXCUSE YOU. Nick Rekieta has NEVER needed drugs to believe he’s the smartest guy in the room!

(But he takes them anyway. I hope no one asks him how many drug tests he’s failed, and if he’d be willing to bet that those multiple failed tests will never be entered into the public record. Because his only shot at avoiding that is a plea deal — IF the prosecution is still willing to offer him one…)
He takes them because he IS the smartest man in the room! He is smarter than the addictive powers and can use their 'benefits' to empower himself even more. Weird you think he can't handle drugs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJq_FdQ-FJc coomalot is suggesting Nick is running out of money.
Coomalot can go hang himself all he does is try to lure people in to get views and revenue. Anything he says cannot be trusted or is a no brainer take. It all belongs in the trash with the rest of his content.

I can not understand how Coomalot keeps releasing embarrassing info about Rekieta, yet has not received any shower texts about it.
Because Coomalot is such a bottom feeding faggot even nick doesn't care what he has to say. The active enjoyers of his content have a protruding forehead and an ever open mouth.

Isn't nick's dad named Bob too?
"Its like poetry, they rhymes"

I wonder if anything immediate will come of the new revelations.
They'd have to be brought up as separate cases and can't just be piled onto the new stuff I'd imagine.
 
The trusts set up by Louis were for Peaches, his children and the foundation. Ty was the trustee for the trusts for the Owen children, but he can be removed by the trust beneficiary (and for all we know, has been by Celeste).
Ty wasn't the trustee for all of the trusts. Each child had their own trust of which they were the trustee.

The family foundation is its own separate entity. While the will enumerated certain conditions under which the foundation would get some of the estate, tax records of the foundation indicate it didn't get anything.

@Balldo's Gate

My assumption is that he’s either given a very easy charity board position making high five figures to low six figures or he got a tugboat from his parents as law offices in a strip mall do not come cheap. Louis and Peaches started their charitable donations in the late 2000’s and then Louis died in 2016(?) with Peaches following in 2019. I could see Nick being brought on to help learn business as he seems to have a handle on estate law per the other practicing YouTube lawyers. His grandfather, Louis, admired his lawyer uncle and I could see Nick manipulating his demented grandfather to get a document reading job for the charity.

Or his mother organized her trust to pay out to her children because Bob probably got a good retirement package
The tax records for the foundation are public record. It's not how Rekieta is funded.
I've guessed that it goes through that Nevada LLC, but that's just an inference based on its name.

Nick was trying to sell the house when Aaron and April first came on the scene, most likely to pay the mounting legal costs of the continuing Montagraph legal action.

I'm not sure why people think that Celeste and Bob are the least bit interested in holding Nick accountable.
Around the time Aaron later said Nick was pressuring him to buy the house Nick was rambling on stream about how he was about to do something to finally get the extension to his house started, he had some sort of weird setup in his head where the room would have multiple "sets" and his desk would be mounted in the middle of a room on top of something that would spin around based on whether he was doing a normal stream or a Locals stream or whatever. I don't think he had legal expenses in mind.

It's definitely probative on the issue because if she tested positive, it puts the kibosh on any nonsensical fairy story Nick tells about how there were no drugs in the house ever.
Also, even if it was totally irrelevant to what he's actually charged with, it definitely influences what kind of a deal you're going to be offered.

Nick doesn't seem to realize that. When he was doing his interview on the show with the friend of Vito, the fat pervert friend of Vito, and the puppet he seemed to be thinking they were going to contact him any day with his sweetheart deal.

Is Kayla even there? I'm thinking Kayla and the kids may have left him.
Kayla has been audible on his recent cooking streams multiple times.

It doesn't quite explain Keanu calling Nick's actions "HEINOUS!" unless that's just dabbleverse hyperbole (possibly). Nick blaming April for missing/being late to a drug test is Passive Aggressive Nick on any given day.
From the documents posted before the case was sealed it said missed tests were considered fails, in principle it could impact custody.

> Nov. 4 (Monday) Nick and April are not "together" (word parsing, probably)
Melton's stream is here but I assume this was all of Nick's chats.
See below:
All messages sent by Rekieta to Patrick Melton/NLO chat (November 4, 2024)
(Link to stream)
 
Something huge is coming, I can feel it.
You have to be retarded to rate this optimistic, It’s been getting worse and worse and funnier and funnier for Nick the longer this goes on. He will give us another dear John stream or another arrest.
Is Kayla even there? I'm thinking Kayla and the kids may have left him.

The grandparent video talked about celebrating a kid's birthday on a day that wasn't the kid's actual birthday, something done to accommodate separated parents. It's Nick's parents bringing the kids by, not Kayla's. The Facebook post from Dan Sletta was made just before she would have left. The major Nick+Kayla fight Kiki reports would match up.

A couple weeks ago Nick started filming 2am cooking streams while noticeably intoxicated. April and Nick both suddenly materialized on Xitter with meth fueled tweets. The kitchen counter looks straight outta Hoarders. Even Kayla wouldn't risk losing her kids again, assuming she's sober.

April's tweets painted a picture that she was nowhere near Nick, painfully yearning to see him, which is something those retards would think clever if sitting right next to each other. Nick said on Molester Melton's stream that he missed April and wanted to see her. We later learned from Kiki that April's been no further than the whore shed this whole time. Wouldn't surprise me if the whole thing was to gaslight Kayla re: April's location.

View attachment 6656539
He just did the cooking stream to debunk this theory, but it sounded like he was pointing a gun to all their heads and holding them hostage.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Balldo's Gate

My assumption is that he’s either given a very easy charity board position making high five figures to low six figures or he got a tugboat from his parents as law offices in a strip mall do not come cheap…. I could see Nick being brought on to help learn business as he seems to have a handle on estate law

This fits with what Nick has said about his having guaranteed business moving forward no matter what happens, if he did have some board work that required maybe a months worth of work a year. It also might be why he reacted the way he did with the people putting in ethics complaints: Remember his little sperg out about how he will always work hard to keep and defend his law license because of how much time he had to sacrifice away from family to get it? We all know how much he values time with his family, so that’s not fucking it.

More and more, I’m convinced he got his law degree so he could figure out how to weasel as much money as possible from his parents and grandparents. The dynamic you describe where Louis revered his lawyer (father? grandfather?) would be something a shrewd individual could pick up on and lean into to try and snake his way into the estate discussions and represent his own interests as much as possible.

“I’m gonna be a lawyer too, gramps! Have you thought about putting aside something for your grandchildren?” :really:

We know Nick is lazy and a liar. The thing about lazy liars who have some brain cells to rub together is that they know when they need to exert the bare minimum effort to continue their lazy, lying ways. Going to law school was a calculated move by Rackets to ensure he never had to do more than the bare minimum. It’s also why he turned down offers to work for other firms - why would he do all that work if he could sit on his ass until he needed to crank something out last minute for a deadline?

Anyway, it’ll be really fucking funny if he gets disbarred for the Google shit. Congratulations, retard! You have likely fucked up the one thing you could have salvaged out of all of this! That is, the one thing besides April’s stinky BPD snatch

ETA: BalldosGate has confirmation that Rekieta isn’t listed as an employee of the foundation. I’m wondering if there would be a way to obfuscate that. Non-profits will keep the nominal salary of c-level employees low so that they don’t have to appear on 990’s, for instance, then make up for that on the backend with benefits. And no I’m not asking this because I’m not ready to give up on my pet theory, shut up.
 
Last edited:
There are plenty of men in Rekieta’s position who get… Urges, and never blow up their lives.
The point is the new Internet economy propelled a new category of men to this position: antisocial, low T, midwit nerds. There is an abundance of Internet (((creators))) that fall on this same trap. Of course sports related niggers slap around their girlfriends and kids but even among them there are some traditional male traces, exceptionality and even above average intelligence. The Internet elevating mediocre people who would never make it in million years to fame generated a whole bunch of starstruck retards degenerates.
 
This nasally whining, effeminate, swishy little homo calling anyone else womanly is a sick joke. One of the few funny ones he's ever told.
If only he had. That was the most favorable interpretation of a joke possible from Nicks Dear Diary diarrhea. He used a misapplied & wrong definition of the term to describe “birthing brands of shame upon addicts,” (paraphrasing here) calling that imagined process he was suffering through, “matriarchal.” Because of his use of “birth” for the forming of a new “brand“ (of shame) he must wear. He clearly didn’t know that the definition of matriarchy is woman led or ruled society. Point is, he told no such joke, if only he had, maybe he could try again for that comedy career which keeps eluding his grasp.

ETA:
Did anyone notice the 1k drop of YT subs on the 10th? It was 17 days between the drops when the last one was 20 days. Seems the various happenings sped up the decline. There is a chance he could dip to 429k this month.
View attachment 6656599
I also noticed Nick is hemorrhaging followers on X. Lost at least 1000 since his first bizarro cooking stream. He’s currently around 157.9k down from 159k or so.
 
Out of curiosity, I looked up the psychiatric criteria for narcissistic personality disorder to see how well it fits with Nick:
IMG_3038.jpeg
He definitely fits the “need for admiration” and “lack of empathy” criteria, although I’m not entirely sure if “grandiosity” is especially pronounced with Rekieta, although I think it is there (Lawpope, humble-bragging about money, “good Christian family man” image). I wonder if people more well versed in his lore could fill in the rest.
 
Back