"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

Some retard on Bluesky thought KF was bought by The Onion
1731902051678.png
 
I had to re-read this a few times. My first impression was "The Onion buying InforWars AND Kiwifarms is funny..." because we all know Josh's sales terms, but I think I see a second meaning. "The Onion buying InfoWars, and Kiwifarms is funny but they(Kiwifarms) should doxx the (InfoWars) subscriber lists" makes more sense in they think we'd somehow have access during the transfer and would punish InfoWars customers automatically.
 
I give it less than a week before tranny Reddit admins demand the mods there stop letting the people in it talk about how people with dicks aren't actually lesbians, and if they don't comply, a week before it's banned like r/truelesbians and the others like it were- for "promoting hate".
After the same ladies destroyed all male exclusive spaces I fully support transgenders destroying all female spaces and I'm going to laugh at all of you ladies ha ha ha ha
 
After the same ladies destroyed all male exclusive spaces I fully support transgenders destroying all female spaces and I'm going to laugh at all of you ladies ha ha ha ha
I support it because the sooner women decide they've had enough, the house of cards will fall apart. Women are really the linchpin allowing trannies to continue their bs.
 
With Brendan Carr now confirmed as FCC chair in the Trump administration it might be interesting to take a glance at the FCC chapter he authored for Project 2025. I know better then to blindly trust people based on 'manifestos', especially when dealing with everyone's favorite section 230 but eh.
Protections against back-end service discrimination, including DDoS and hosting services, are directly mentioned.
1731930305456.png
Full chapter here: https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_CHAPTER-28.pdf
 
Carr gave AIDs to was an aide for Pajeet Pai plus he is big critical of TikTok, seeing it as a national security threat... otherwise no idea, never heard of him. EDIT: Oh he is very critical of Section 230 that's probably why.
 
I feel there’s two aspects of 230 that get conflated. One is the “site isn’t liable for the shit the users post” which is important to keep the sites alive (and in fact this needs to be expanded to other industries). But there’s another aspect where they hide behind 230 and say that algorithms and bans and other platform manipulation by the company is also protected by 230 and is not “corporate speech” that can be contested in court.

I feel they’re trying to have their cake and eat it too and something eventually will need to be done if 230 is to survive.

Google et al would love nothing MORE than for both to go down, as the big companies are big enough to take on liability for user posts but no startups ever could survive, cementing their dominance forever. Watch for it.
 
Back