Kipersonapiscesotter
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2024
Here is something i am wondering about. The big charge obviously is the felony drug posession for over 25g, which is the main caveat that's going to be argued in the case. As for the firearms while posessing drugs yeah that's a gross misdemeanor and probs gonna be used as a bargaining chip for the plea deal. However the other gross misdemeanor which is child endagerment, how come with his daughter popping positive isn't it a felony ? Legit curious as to what would constitute a felony in this occasion. Also let's put ourselves in a hypothetical. You are Rekieta's Lawyer with all this shit infront of you, and you have a phonecall in one hour, what would you say to him ?
To be honest I was ready to believe at the time that it was a lab mixup. Like they tested Kayla's or Nick's sample by mistake. That took quite a knock when Lord Balldo got up in court and explained to the Judge, without being asked, that if any child tests positive its from environmental exposure. That was before the results came back. That's a pretty odd thing to say.
I imagine the kid was asked if she had snorted any white powder and she said no. I think they decided not to pursue it based on that.
If she really had been taking cocaine, it was likely orally. In a glass of water or something. Or mixed in food. It still gives effect, just delayed and it can be dangerous.
Balldo could have insisted on a retest. He didn't in the last transcripts we had access to. Pretty odd considering how he liked to interrupt the court.
I imagine Nick was waiting for a deferral program. You can end up with no record if you complete things like rehab and test clean. 26g is likely too much for it though. Its something April is likely to get. If they were going to offer a diversion for April (less severe than a deferral) they would likely have done so.The endangerment/neglect charge they have simply relates to having kids in his care around drugs. It has nothing to do with the positive test. It could be that they doubt the test, or it could be that they simply can't think they can prove who was responsible for that test being possible.
That said, I have a feeling the test result will have some bearing on what deal he's offered. Nick doesn't sound happy with what's on the table, and it appears the current deal makes him plea to everything. Will Nick take it all to trial because he refuses to say he is GUILTY of neglect?
If Nick rejected a sweet deal like a deferral program he is a grade A moron. He might be so deluded to think he deserved a diversion program.
Nick was likely offered probation lasting years. Along with alcohol and drug testing. A probation officer, etc. Suspended sentence if he stays a good boy.
Ironically this might be off the table already. You are supposed to avoid new legal troubles. You know, like unauthorised access to someones Google account and witness tampering.
Nick actually might see prison if they can nail him on the unauthorised access.