Debate Jade Philosophies on the age of consent - We've got a live one

Might be a power level or whatever, but I simply married a woman who is practically my exact age with as close to matching values as possible and whatever else we go through we have the solid foundation of being on the same page, morally, culturally, and whatever else, so that even when we disagree we both know exactly where the other is coming from and can work from a mutual understanding.
 
In other words, is it just a comorbidity and just the heritability, or is it the age gap itself that increases the autism? Either would be interesting.
Autism is something that's gone wrong and dried up elder eggs/twisted and deformed primordial sperm will just be more susceptible to wrong-going, same reason they also have more asthma.
This is at 40+ though, I think the actual median ideal age that gets shilled for by non PDFs is anything between 20-35 which may as well just be saying "take your vitamins lol" in terms of how specific it is.
I think @Luke-Warm Tampon Tea was hit with the banhammer.
I swear to zombie Jesus that n'wah had a pink triangle already might just have been revealed to me in a dream.
 
Too bad they're British.
Yeah, even a broken clock is right twice a day.

I include 17 because most countries have an age of consent of 16 but that is too young, but at 17 you can drive by yourself in most places, and in most places buy alcohol for yourself, etc. Society expects a certain level of maturity from 17 and 18 year olds.
Going by what "most countries" do is not a compelling argument. It's actually stupid if they can buy booze at that age, and especially driving. We should be much more strict about who can drive in general, but I don't want to derail the thread into that.

I have a genius-level IQ
:optimistic:

My views are common sense and not the cultural marxist/feminist bullshit that you've been brainwashed with.
You're making people who hate cultural Marxists look bad so it's counterproductive, you're actually helping them.

If you didn't get married and you're 37, the answer is not dating an 18 year old.
You're right, it's dating a 21 year old so you can both legally get drunk.
 
Because they want to. It's called freedom.
You really ought to stop free will jacketing your pederast apologia it only makes you less genuine, there's freedom and then there's responsibility, and adults with the freedom to know better have the responsibility to not make excuses for those who should really know better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trombonista
This is the opposite of true. The odds of autism and other forms of mental retardation increase with age, as well as chromatic mosaicism/down syndrome.
View attachment 6658647

By at 15 a woman has 50-55% of her ovarian reserves left. By age 30 she has only 10% of her ovaries left.
View attachment 6658644

View attachment 6658650




As I said in my first post "underage" relates to ages under the statutory age of consent. If a person is above the age of consent then they're not under age. You keep saying "underage" to sensationalize things, but whether you find it unfortunate or not, in many countries 16 is not "underage", and in some other countries 17 is not "underage"

I'm not going to power level too much because it's fucking retarded to tell people on the details of your life but my preferences are for women between the ages of 18 and 24, I won't date women over the age of 24. I'd strongly prefer to date 18-19 but 24 is my limit. I'm currently engaged to someone who is within my dating range.
I love how you spam MUH DOWN SYNDROME when mens sperm has been found to be also at fault. Women statistically speaking marry with older partners. HERE are the risks of dusty sperm brokie

Screenshot 2024-11-19 103147.pngScreenshot 2024-11-19 103124.pngScreenshot 2024-11-19 103138.pngScreenshot 2024-11-19 103100.png



Sauce

here is simple write up that interprets the date for you how fathers age effects your kids health deadender


Can aging cause genetic mutations in sperm?

A woman is born with all the eggs she’ll ever have. But a man is constantly making new sperm cells that divide and replicate about every 16 days. By age 20, a man’s sperm cells have gone through about 150 divisions. That number could grow to 800 by the time he is 50.
Couple consulting with a doctor in an office.

Vasectomy: Safe, effective, affordable birth control for men
Many men have reservations about elective surgery on a sensitive area, but according to the CDC, only 5% of men regret getting a vasectomy and 6% of women regret their partner’s vasectomy.
Learn more
The more times sperm cells replicate, the more chances there is for a genetic mutation to occur. Fortunately, most genetic mutations are benign, meaning they won’t cause any harm to a baby.
Examples of genetic conditions that have been associated with advanced paternal age include some skeletal dysplasias or dwarfism syndromes. These include achondroplasia, the most common form of dwarfism, and thanatophoric dysplasia. Some types of craniosynostosis syndromes have also been associated with advanced paternal age. These cause the premature fusion of bones in the skull, which affects head shape, and include Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, and Apert syndrome.
These conditions are caused by genetic variations (or mutations) in specific genes. They are sometimes inherited but can also occur sporadically and unpredictably. One factor correlated with this sporadic genetic variation in some cases is paternal age.
We routinely offer testing during pregnancy for conditions associated with maternal age, such as Down syndrome, but with 20,000 human genes, there are just too many potential genetic mutations associated with paternal age to check all of them. Talk with a doctor or genetic counselor about your unique situation and whether genetic testing may be appropriate.

What other conditions are associated with paternal age?​

A father’s age can also affect a baby’s health at birth and later in life. One study revealed that babies who are born to men 45 or older were 14% more likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), 14% more likely to be born premature, 18% more likely to have seizures, and 14% more likely to have a low birth weight.
The same study also found that pregnant women whose partners are 45 or older are 28% more likely to develop gestational diabetes, which can lead to a larger baby, low neonatal blood sugar, premature birth, and increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes later in life.
Research has shown a connection between advanced paternal age and several childhood cancers, such as leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and a range of psychiatric and neurological disorders, such as schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. However, these diseases are multifactorial, which means they are caused by a complex combination of genetic and non-genetic factors, including environmental and lifestyle factors.
Having an older father does not mean a baby will automatically develop any of the conditions listed above. Although advanced paternal age does bear some risk, there is a very low likelihood that becoming a father late in life will adversely impact the future health of your baby.
If you have questions, though, talk with your health care provider and a genetic counselor. We can help you understand the risks and recommend any tests or procedures that are available to increase your chances of a healthy pregnancy and baby.


Also lol defective sperm


Screenshot 2024-11-19 104105.png

 
Last edited:
Because they want to. It's called freedom.
By that logic why have any laws at all? Next you could argue for letting them marry at 15, freedom isn't absolute. There's got to be limits on everything. Marriage is a real commitment, it should not be reduced to a whim partaken of by ignorant youths.

I probably sound much more harsh via text than I intend to come across, I really don't care they're getting married and hope for the best for them, but just in principle I dislike changing laws willynilly, if it ain't broke don't fix it.
 
By that logic why have any laws at all? Next you could argue for letting them marry at 15, freedom isn't absolute. There's got to be limits on everything. Marriage is a real commitment, it should not be reduced to a whim partaken of by ignorant youths.
No, you don't understand this is the most impeding intrusion on the lives and personal freedom of the common citizen in Britain to have ever transpired. Why don't you see that?
 
By that logic why have any laws at all? Next you could argue for letting them marry at 15, freedom isn't absolute. There's got to be limits on everything. Marriage is a real commitment, it should not be reduced to a whim partaken of by ignorant youths.

I probably sound much more harsh via text than I intend to come across, I really don't care they're getting married and hope for the best for them, but just in principle I dislike changing laws willynilly, if it ain't broke don't fix it.

See, you're infantilising young adults. Calling them "ignorant youths". When 2 people fall in love and decide to get married then they should be able to. Like the couple in the article. They're in the USA and obviously whichever state they're in allows marriage at 16. It says he's from Alabama so I presume that's where they got married. The fact that the UK government changed the law last year to violate 16 and 17 year olds' human rights by banning marriage at that age is just evil and anti-family.

No, you don't understand this is the most impeding intrusion on the lives and personal freedom of the common citizen in Britain to have ever transpired. Why don't you see that?

Yes, it's violating thousands of years-worth of Britons' human rights. As far as I know 16 and 17 year olds have always been able to get married. (And it used to be even younger.)
 
Back