State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?

  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
"You only think I was denied! That's what's so FUNNY and WEIRD! I switched the filings while your back was turned!!! Ha ha, you NERD! YOU DORK! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is 'Never get involved with a PRACTICING lawyer!' - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go against a Balldo when coke is on the line"! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha..".

1732048966547.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Otis Mallebrok, River possum, Thunderous Lightning and 36 others
REGENDarySumanai said:
He's just delaying the inevitable ass beating from the legal system.
Click to expand...
This didn't even delay anything. Was this another $5K, $10K he might as well have just spent on cocaine? The appeals court didn't even issue a stay delaying the lower court case, and the state didn't even spend a dime or a minute of their time.

They won by doing nothing while Balldo felted himself.
Balldo's Gate said:
OOPS! That doesn't sound good. It's not as if the entire point of the petition was supposed to be explaining that.
Click to expand...
Interlocutory review of an evidentiary issue is almost never granted. When it is granted, it requires a very strong showing. Instead, Balldo put on no showing at all why a completely cut-and-dried, routine denial of a motion deserved immediate review. None. At all.

Little Lord Balldoroy just thinks he should get special rules for him and him alone.
bile demon said:
Rekieta is the Patrick Tomlinson of lawyers.
Click to expand...
Tomlinson was at least at one point a practicing writer.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, Pedophobe, Hraf and 17 others
Nick will no doubt cope that you just 'have to' put forward these frivolous motions in case something sticks. But you don't. A sound legal strategy involves knowing where the areas of best effort are, the scattershot approach only makes sense if you have infinite time and resources, and the State has infinite patience, none of which are true. The time he wasted on this bullshit should've been put towards securing a plea deal, or if he's really mega dumb, preparing his defence.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, Pedophobe, Thunderous Lightning and 13 others
Oxous said:
One of the arguments White made in his petition was that "The question of what must be shown in the social media video context to demonstrate unreliability has never been directly answered in the context of a Franks motion."
Click to expand...
So far as I remember, that is quite literally the only sentence in the whole petition that was even remotely germane to the issue raised, and he never elaborated on it. I mean so what? Who cares? Why's that important? More importantly, why does it need to be resolved on an emergency basis?

No reason at all.

Whatever would establish unreliability, a fucking "watermark" (which was not even a watermark) is not it. So why would this be the case to decide the issue?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pedophobe, Botchy Galoop, Thunderous Lightning and 8 others
AnOminous said:
So far as I remember, that is quite literally the only sentence in the whole petition that was even remotely germane to the issue raised, and he never elaborated on it. I mean so what? Who cares? Why's that important? More importantly, why does it need to be resolved on an emergency basis?

No reason at all.

Whatever would establish unreliability, a fucking "watermark" (which was not even a watermark) is not it. So why would this be the case to decide the issue?
Click to expand...
It's the same strategy he used on Null to get him to fix his thread, mention the issue and then wait for them to act on it without being told what to do, then when they don't fix it he'll passive aggressively seethe.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Autistic
Reactions: Windy Moors, Blewberry Nausea, Pedophobe and 13 others
so we are at plea deal by end of month or court.
plea is for drugs & X punishment.
for optics will he try to get plea deal adjusted because ralph witness & data tampering no be seperately charged.
will procesuction not ask about witness tampering.
 
Last edited:
Honka Honka Burning Love said:
Time for another Coke, Cope and Cry stream
Click to expand...
Sequels usually disappoint and Nick himself seemed to have gone into this already defeated.

I don't think this second Denialocaust is going to get him to melt down anymore than he already has been.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, Botchy Galoop, Thunderous Lightning and 13 others
Francis York Morgan said:
Sequels usually disappoint and Nick himself seemed to have gone into this already defeated.

I don't think this second Denialocaust is going to get him to melt down anymore than he already has been.
Click to expand...
Right, but on the other hand he's been incredibly agitated last week.

You know, like going from 0 to 100 and going from 100 to 140, I'm betting on the second one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Third World Aristocrat
Francis York Morgan said:
Sequels usually disappoint and Nick himself seemed to have gone into this already defeated.

I don't think this second Denialocaust is going to get him to melt down anymore than he already has been.
Click to expand...
I just wanted to make a Coke and Cope stream joke tbh.

Because Nick deserves to be Bullied like the N-word he is.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, koos koets, St. Alia of the Knife and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back