Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[uhoh spaghettios]

April has removed the recipe and co-conspirator nonsense from her IG and twitter bios and has replaced it with something more mysterious and deep-sounding: “God fought my battles long ago.”

"I was born retarded."

 

[HackerX]

Believe it or not having 26.67 grams of cocaine, unknown brown substances, weed gummies, firearms, and sending children to quack chiropractors IS child endangerment.
Having one of them testing positive for the drug you have almost 27 grams of just makes it worse, it's not the opposite

If you follow Mr. Cuckieta's crackhead logic, the only reasonable explanation is that his existence endangers the child.

 

[Soapmore]

The Feltening continues.

Someone earlier commented about how people who cared about Nick gave him advice and he threw it in their faces. This is for me perhaps the most tragic part, because it speaks to a general dismissal of anyone's advice, of any kind; how to mend fences with loved ones, how to better parent difficult situations, and how to swallow pride and admit when you need help. His mode seems to generally flout the counsel of anyone who might have wisdom to impart, and perversely so; inversely proportional to how much they care. It's no surprise that he similarly spits on the Bible, itself a manual of how to live and conduct oneself. (Maybe not everyone's manual or your manual, but one that's stood quite a test of time and has a lot to impart when taken in the right mind.)

I don't think a redemption is impossible, in fact that deeper the pit one recovers from, the stronger the lessons, and the better the story for others. But I sadly don't see that in Nick at all, at least at this point. When I hit the first rock bottom in my life (thankfully the only one so far), and there was nowhere to go but up, the messages I learned were indelibly burned in my psyche. I shudder to think where I'd be, of if I'd be at all, had I not had the sense to realize I'd hit the bottom of the pit, admit I needed help, and quit digging. Nick seems armed with a shovel in each hand, with more on order for those he's enlisting to help him, and willing they are (for their own advantage).

April, who seems to fulfill Aaron's diagnosis of mirroring those around her, seems to have handcuffed herself to his fate, and likewise rejects counsel of those who care enough to say Get Out girl, while you still can. I honestly don't know what to think about Kayla, other than to hope that her relative silence indicates she's trying to chart a more rational course for herself and her children. I watch this family drama with all the interest of a gawking cretin who can't look away but who also hopes to find some lessons, if only as a cautionary tale, from it all. May God bless all these souls, if they choose to accept it.

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

Nick will never take accountability for anything, and that's one of the more frustrating parts of this. Literally everyone/somethings fault than his.

i already said I did a mountain of cocaine what more do you want you kiwi incel prude NERD?!

 

[Balldo's Gate]

TL/DR: Unless there is some report/complaint/petition from the County where they claimed the children were "exposed to drugs from some other source" that we haven't seen (yet somehow reacted to), Nick is misrepresenting his own words as claims made by the County itself.

Its from the initial petition from May 24:
"It was confirmed by the older children that if their tests were positive, it was because they were exposed to someone else using drugs."

No matter what he does for the rest of his life, he will forever be known as the man whose nine-year-old daughter tested positive for cocaine. If only somebody, a friend perhaps, had warned him to pull up from his nosedive while there was still time.

And in a week's time he will be known as the guy who plead guilty to endangering his children. Because that's precisely what he did.

 

[AnOminous]

I think the novel bit that they argued (and appellate court ignored) was that relying on a livestream video for probable cause is a novel application of evidence.

It's because it isn't relevant to the standard for granting extraordinary interlocutory appeals. The issue isn't whether the case presents a novel issue, whether the defendant is prejudiced by it, or even whether the original decision was right. The issue is why does THIS specific case deserve a deviation from the standard rule that such rulings are taken up after the resolution of the case.

Either Nick's going to win (in which case granting review at all would have been a waste of time) or he's going to lose and then he can stand in line and appeal just like the rest of the convicted criminals.

For instance, a real reason might be "there are twenty separate criminal cases currently pending in trial courts across the state on this exact unresolved issue so judicial economy would be aided by having it resolved and applied evenly across all these pending cases."

Nick's argument is basically this is an emergency because I'm Little Lord Balldoroy and deserve special treatment.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

It's because it isn't relevant to the standard for granting extraordinary interlocutory appeals. The issue isn't whether the case presents a novel issue, whether the defendant is prejudiced by it, or even whether the original decision was right. The issue is why does THIS specific case deserve a deviation from the standard rule that such rulings are taken up after the resolution of the case.

Either Nick's going to win (in which case granting review at all would have been a waste of time) or he's going to lose and then he can stand in line and appeal just like the rest of the convicted criminals.

For instance, a real reason might be "there are twenty separate criminal cases currently pending in trial courts across the state on this exact unresolved issue so judicial economy would be aided by having it resolved and applied evenly across all these pending cases."

Nick's argument is basically this is an emergency because I'm Little Lord Balldoroy and deserve special treatment.

You’re right, this is a case for the Supreme Court

 

[MadStan]

The only person in Nicks orbit making any sense is Kayla - and she is saying nothing which sounds like the hallmark of a more serious person; and probably someone who is not high.

 

[datura_binge]

The only person in Nicks orbit making any sense is Kayla - and she is saying nothing which sounds like the hallmark of a more serious person; and probably someone who is not high.

Kayla Rekeita, Serious Person. The comedy writes itself.

 

[Windy Moors]

Funny replies to his latest xeet posted by @Mouse Cop:

Link / Archive

They learned it by watching you!

 

[Potentially Criminal]

In the line that says,

"Petitioner does not explain why the district court's pretrial ruling denying his motions to suppress evidence and for a Franks evidentiary hearing requires this court's immediate review."

could the court just be saying that the motion did not make an adequate argument that satisfies some standard? Or would you take this line to mean that Nick's lawyers really made no argument at all as to why the court should grant them a review?

They completely whiffed. Couldn't be bothered to follow the most basic of rules that guide and govern appellate practice in their state.

Why does he keep paying these guys if they're the ones making arguments? Do you like being cucked out of your shekels, Nick?

 

[Chode]

It was confirmed by the older children

Which doesn't explain the 9 year old or why Nick mentions the 6 year old's interview specifically.

 

[BathTubShine]

The only person in Nicks orbit making any sense is Kayla - and she is saying nothing which sounds like the hallmark of a more serious person; and probably someone who is not high.

those prescription benzos and handful of other looney pills sure hit different than Nick's meth-adjacent pills.

 

[All becomes gunt]

Yes, the "other sources" seem to be very limited.

In the supplemental report one of the anonymous parties advised that they didn't believe that the two eldest daughters were being homeschooled at the time. This would include the daughter who tested positive for cocaine.

Since they are part of a homeschool co-op, this would indicate that the daughters were missing classes or otherwise noticeably absent.

View attachment 6663851

If the Rekietas were just making do with iPads for their homeschooling needs then that further restricts "exposure" from others.

Personally i think it makes a good case for child neglect. Because sure ok let's say it wasn't you, it's still your kid and you are his guardian. If your 8 yo homeschooled daughter pops positive for cocaine AND SOMEHOW you didn't realise it despite being at home all day something is wrong here. It's really a catch 22, because if he feigns ignorance he is a shit father that doesn't care about his kid if he claims to know something then everything he says is incriminating. Especially with that preemptive "secondary source of exposure" cope he threw. It's almost as if he knew that source of exposure in the end of the day. I wonder what could that be hmmmm, really gets my noggin joggin.

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

They completely whiffed. Couldn't be bothered to follow the most basic of rules that guide and govern appellate practice in their state.

what are the chances that rackets basically created it and the lawyers filed for him? all the seething about aaron in these filings indicate to me the lawyers are being brow beaten into filing these dogshit appeals and such.

 

[Journoscum]

So Skelly, when are you going to PAY MONTY?

It's so funny that the null/Nick fallout was centered around Nick and his lawyer speak. Well in this case it was Nick just fibbing about what he actually said, but he THOUGHT he was doing lawyer word games.

 

[All becomes gunt]

He's back at it again (archive)

View attachment 6663941
No matter what he does for the rest of his life, he will forever be known as the man whose nine-year-old daughter tested positive for cocaine. If only somebody, a friend perhaps, had warned him to pull up from his nosedive while there was still time.

A normal, fully healthy child that popped positive for cocaine. And with the kid being completely ignorant on the subject of drugs it must have been done by someone she trusted. I'll say this, maybe the prosecution is waiting and documenting to bring more charges to the table, just because you were charged once it doesn't make you immune to additional charges.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Do you like being cucked [...], Nick?

The answer to this question is always a resounding "yes!"

 

[Mandatory User Name]

They completely whiffed. Couldn't be bothered to follow the most basic of rules that guide and govern appellate practice in their state.

Why does he keep paying these guys if they're the ones making arguments? Do you like being cucked out of your shekels, Nick?

First Randazza and now the Barneswalker Nick picked up off of locals, there's a good reason you don't hire out-of-state attorneys.

 

[Not Really Here]

The only person in Nicks orbit making any sense is Kayla - and she is saying nothing which sounds like the hallmark of a more serious person; and probably someone who is not high.

She never had a habit of talking online, supposedly she's introverted.