Off-Topic "Scientific" Studies regarding Transpeople

[deermeat]

I have a question for you all: Just how reliable are studies, even the peer-reviewed ones? Is it a common belief here that most of the peer-reviewed studies that reinforce pooners/troons beliefs are fake and have fabricated results?

The problem with "studies" within a compromised field is that they are created to affirm a bias to push a narrative that has already been declared. They declare something, people question it, then they quickly scramble up a study so they can go "see?? I'm right". It's not science, it's propaganda in these cases.

With troonery (much like current fat acceptance), theres literally no way there could ever be a "real" trans study as theres already thousands of years of pre-existing science, along with basic logic and reasoning such ie "what is a woman/man", to prove them wrong.
This is why with the current psyop, they attached to themself with not only an already poorly understood minority group (homosexuals) but also a poorly understood scientific field- mental illness. Creating the perfect storm to spread propaganda in order to sell medication and a whole new genre of "therapy". Troons didnt come first then doctors jumped into to profit. Gender dsyphoria was never real to begin with. The concept of the word "gender" was never real. When people who has yet to fully peak say "HRT should be used only has a last resort", they have failed to realize that the conditon itself isn't real- therefore making HRT being used as always a first resort for any troon-supporting, compromised professional since according to medical dogma HRT is reversible and the dangers of not prescribing it outweights the potential regret. You don't prescribe liposuction as a "last resort" to an anorexic with severe body dsymoprhia.

You can sit here and say "oh, people have always struggled with GD, its just now people know theres a name for it" No. People have always struggled with strict gender roles, homophobia, and general delusions. It doesn't need to be its own special label. It doesn't make any scientific sense to do so. Either the person has psychosis, severe body dsymorphia, BIID, or a porn addiction. Its not its own stand-alone thing and can easily be explained away, even now more than ever. Its not a mystery illness with no known cause. For most people, its not even as complex as something like body dsymorphia as most troons are merely porn addicts.

Theres no reason to even remotely suggest the possibility of HRT or puberty blockers being helpful because theres already data to suggest the dangers of hormonal injections and hormonal imblances, and the impacts of ones puberty being delayed or missing through pre-existing medical conditons that has caused such to occur. Theres already data to suggest how dangerous it is to affirm someones delusions, and how badly addiction can take over someones life. Theres already data on the concept of social contagion and the biological differences between men and women. You cant create a new branch of scientific analyisis then act as if though no data from any other field of study can be cross-examined.

 

[and I must scream]

I have a question for you all: Just how reliable are studies, even the peer-reviewed ones? Is it a common belief here that most of the peer-reviewed studies that reinforce pooners/troons beliefs are fake and have fabricated results?

I don't think they are fake and have fabricated results; I think they are poorly designed on purpose, that the researchers play with the statistics to tweak the results in their favour, and that they write the conclusions or/and discussion part, the abstract and any other part they can insert their input in, in a very biased way. They also cite other studies which are just as purposely flewed, so you get the impression that science is settled on the matter. And when all fail and they can't pretend their results serve the TRA narrative, they often withhold publication.

The result is basically the same as if they wrote fake articles and fabricated the results. Trans activists (TRA) like to dismiss the Cass Review because it ignores a huge chunk of studies on the matter, but that it because the quality of these studies is so poor, because of the above. Of course TRA are still screaming "transphobia" and refuse to acknowledge the truth - these studies are so badly made, they worth absolutely nothing.

 

[Cronchyapple]

Here are some statistics regarding various trans topics.

First, let’s look at public opinions of TIMs in sports:

Professional in 2021:

College in 2021:

High school in 2021:


Now let’s look at the shift from 2021 to 2022:

This isn’t just high school or college level - just overall. The opposition has significantly increased in the span of a year.

Do people think TIMs have an advantage?

In 2021 over half of people say yes. Yes they do.

What about our valid doods?



What about society? Are we becoming more accepting?



Let’s look at the sex and political party break down:


Not surprised a lot of women are concerned but many handmaidens.

Some more stuff:

I have a lot more stats to publish about trans stuff. Let me know if this is the right place to publish it or if I should move it elsewhere.

 

[FinnSven]

I have a lot more stats to publish about trans stuff. Let me know if this is the right place to publish it or if I should move it elsewhere.

Do you have any stats on how many crimes committed by transgender people?

Especially in comparison to crime committed by their chosen sex without the inclusion of trans people?

 

[Cronchyapple]

Do you have any stats on how many crimes committed by transgender people?

Especially in comparison to crime committed by their chosen sex without the inclusion of trans people?

I am unable to find that data on statista and I am unable to ask that question using statista AI…
(Please dm for photo - I’m worried about opsec)
Flagged for moderation… yeah sure whatever.
“Gender identity” is okay but it doesn’t show trans people in it.
(please dm for photo)
Here is a pdf report from the UK parliament of evidence and data on trans women offending rates

 

[FinnSven]

I am unable to find that data on statista and I am unable to ask that question using statista AI…
(Please dm for photo - I’m worried about opsec)
Flagged for moderation… yeah sure whatever.
“Gender identity” is okay but it doesn’t show trans people in it.
(please dm for photo)
Here is a pdf report from the UK parliament of evidence and data on trans women offending rates

I think I have seen that before, but thank you.

There should be such statistics to exclude trans women from female crime statistics.

Some clear and defined evidence determining how many trans “women” are sex offenders, especially compared to real women and men, needs to be collated for consideration into whether Troons are imprisoned with women or with men, moving forward.

 

[Stupid Sexy Flanders]

Here are some statistics regarding various trans topics.

Ben Ryan posted some recent summaries of it:



This is based on Napolatin News Agency's research (PDF attached).

I have a question for you all: Just how reliable are studies, even the peer-reviewed ones? Is it a common belief here that most of the peer-reviewed studies that reinforce pooners/troons beliefs are fake and have fabricated results?

It really depends on the methodology and how the study is designed. But really, one study rarely gives conclusive answers. That's why Systematic Literature Reviews are seen as the "gold standard" because it takes such a large scope of data within a field and creates an understanding of it. Unfortunately - almost all trans studies seem to have methodology issues which often means they can't be reproduced and become essentially worthless.

Stuff like case studies can be interesting because they can indicate something, but it might also just be an off data point.

 

[AnOminous]

With troonery (much like current fat acceptance), theres literally no way there could ever be a "real" trans study as theres already thousands of years of pre-existing science, along with basic logic and reasoning such ie "what is a woman/man", to prove them wrong.

This is why troons are even more cancerous than Young Earth Creationists. Except for a tiny sliver of idiots who tried to push it as "Creation Science," most of them just flat out reject science in favor of religion. Troons try to pretend their made up nonsense actually is science.

 

[Dilatortron3000]

Specialgender teen phoenix has been on puberty blockers since 11. She is now **18** and wants to remain in a prepubescent state forever and the doctors are letting it happen
heres the study

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

Specialgender teen phoenix has been on puberty blockers since 11. She is now **18** and wants to remain in a prepubescent state forever and the doctors are letting it happen
heres the study

View attachment 6665300View attachment 6665301

Idiot girl is a guinea pig and her parents should be drawn and quartered.

 

[Stupid Sexy Flanders]

Specialgender teen phoenix has been on puberty blockers since 11. She is now **18** and wants to remain in a prepubescent state forever and the doctors are letting it happen
heres the study

View attachment 6665300View attachment 6665301

It was brought up in the Jazz Jenning's thread that one of his puberty blocked friends had taken them up until he was 19, diagnosed with
osteoporosis and scoliosis and went off them. Of course his puberty came back with a vengeance and is now 20 and developing into the man he is, much to his dismay. What long-term effects it has to block someone's puberty for that long (beyond their bone health being shit) is yet to be seen, but it's fun with consequences.

 

[Dilatortron3000]

It was brought up in the Jazz Jenning's thread that one of his puberty blocked friends had taken them up until he was 19, diagnosed with
osteoporosis and scoliosis and went off them. Of course his puberty came back with a vengeance and is now 20 and developing into the man he is, much to his dismay. What long-term effects it has to block someone's puberty for that long (beyond their bone health being shit) is yet to be seen, but it's fun with consequences.

That guy has an onlyfans and its horrifying. I dont even know why he has one considering he is an asexual eunuch. He has a severely atrophied penis and testicles
I dont understand why the most privileged of troons turn to porn and act as ghetto as possible

 

[uwaga! aooga!]

Now let’s look at the shift from 2021 to 2022:

This isn’t just high school or college level - just overall. The opposition has significantly increased in the span of a year.

I wonder how much of the growth in opposition to tyrannies in female sport is due to 1) increased awareness of troons (familiarity creates contempt), 2) increased awareness of the muscular-skeletal differences between males and females, or 3) increased awareness that "trans women" are actually men pretending to be women and not actually the inverse (women pretending to be men)? Or all three?

Do any of the stats you have access to go into that sort of thing?

 

[FinnSven]

Specialgender teen phoenix has been on puberty blockers since 11. She is now **18** and wants to remain in a prepubescent state forever and the doctors are letting it happen
heres the study

View attachment 6665300View attachment 6665301

I have said this before, but more and more it appears that they think that pre pubescent children do not have a “gender”.

Like it’s irrelevant whether a baby or child is a little boy or girl.
That’s seriously dangerous and demonstrably stupid thinking.
Troons and the quacks who support this need to be sent to a Siberian Gulag.

 

[Aunt Carol]

Specialgender teen phoenix has been on puberty blockers since 11. She is now **18** and wants to remain in a prepubescent state forever and the doctors are letting it happen
heres the study

Jeez, I want a less scientific version of this.

Specifically, I want to see what she looks like, and read or listen to her retarded explanation, in her own mentally-stunted words, of what the hell she thinks she's doing.

There have been other transhumanists who said that puberty and adulthood are entirely optional, but I don't know if anyone's actually been enabled enough to do it. I suspect she's not the perma-child ready-made abuse victim those people want, though. Well, not physically.

 

[Ferryman]

Not directly troon related, but a relative of mine recently attended a congress seminar about the burden of HPV cases & ongoing vaccination effort statistics in men & women, and they stumbled upon a gemmy term in one of the handouts. Take this slide for example:

Looks normal, right? Sure does, until you notice the term MSM at the bottom, which happens to stand for "men who have sex with men". Not directly tranny related per se, but I find that referring to homosexuals as 'men who have sex with men' is really icky, especially in the context of literature published by the highest echelons of medical society. This is the first time I'm seeing this degen terminology but it seems that it isn't that new, with this CDC page from 2022 using the same term. There also seems to be a female version - WSW or "women who have sex with women". Why do we keep having to invent new terminology for fags every few years? Hate to see it.

To make this post more tranny related, here's some gemmy guidelines from our good pals at the CDC:

"Transgender persons often experience high rates of stigma and socioeconomic and structural barriers to care that negatively affect health care usage and increase susceptibility to HIV and STIs (326–332). Persons who are transgender have a gender identity that differs from the sex that they were assigned at birth (333,334). Transgender women (also known as trans women, transfeminine persons, or women of transgender experience) are women who were assigned male sex at birth (born with male anatomy). Transgender men (also known as trans men, transmasculine persons, or men of transgender experience) are men who were assigned female sex at birth (i.e., born with female anatomy). In addition, certain persons might identify outside the gender binary of male or female or move back and forth between different gender identities and use such terms as “gender nonbinary,” “genderqueer,” or “gender fluid” to describe themselves. Persons who use terms such as “agender” or “null gender” do not identify with having any gender. The term “cisgender” is used to describe persons who identify with their assigned sex at birth. Prevalence studies of transgender persons among the overall population have been limited and often are based on small convenience samples."

 

[FinnSven]

This is the first time I'm seeing this degen terminology but it seems that it isn't that new, with this CDC page from 2022 using the same term. There also seems to be a female version - WSW or "women who have sex with women". Why do we keep having to invent new terminology for fags every few years?

That was used in the nineties.
Even then it was considered controversial when it emerged they were also applying it to transvestites and post op transsexuals of the day.

I figured it must have been dropped from use, but it’s actually a good sign if it is coming back and being used and includes referring to chasers and Troons.

 

[Dilatortron3000]

Only 70% of people who begin cross sex hormone therapy will continue beyond four years

Source:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35452119/

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

That guy has an onlyfans and its horrifying.

You paid to see his microdick?

 

[Stupid Sexy Flanders]

Looks normal, right? Sure does, until you notice the term MSM at the bottom, which happens to stand for "men who have sex with men". Not directly tranny related per se, but I find that referring to homosexuals as 'men who have sex with men' is really icky, especially in the context of literature published by the highest echelons of medical society.

It's been used for yonks because it's the most accurate term - a homosexual might not have sex, bisexuals exists, the GAMP/AGP crowd, the prison "gays" and then there's those that have any hole is a goal and so on. I don't think it has to do with "political correctness" as much as accurately describing what's happening.

Of course, if they start counting women who pretend to be men in and men who pretend to be women out, then there's an issue in accuracy.