AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities

Temmie said:
I am a porn addict, but I have standards. I don't want artists put out of work by AI generated, low quality slop. I value creators more than the technical novelty of genai.

When work is created by a human it has more "soul" for lack of a better term. AI art is bland, cold, and lifeless.
Click to expand...
If an AI generated the exact same image as a human once drew, would that image not have soul?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures, Horribadger, secret watcher and 6 others
Temmie said:
People really would rather spend hours typing a prompt than learning to draw wouldn't they?
Click to expand...
How does this support whatever claim you're trying to make? What does it matter how much people enjoy any artistic process? Maybe some artist gets really frustrated while drawing. Maybe some AI creator loves every minute of it. That doesn't have any impact on the legitimacy of the end result.

Temmie said:
Microsoft SAM could read the works of Shakespeare but it would be lifeless, bland, and lack emotion.
Click to expand...
Which is why it's good modern tools provide much better output than Microsoft SAM.

A human could read the works of Shakespeare and render them lifeless, bland, and emotionless. In fact, there wouldn't be anything wrong with someone finding the Bard's prose frustrating and bland as-is. Just because something is old and venerated doesn't make it inherently good or beyond criticism.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: Dunkin DoNUT and Temmie
Temmie said:
I am a porn addict, but I have standards. I don't want artists put out of work by AI generated, low quality slop. I value creators more than the technical novelty of genai.

When work is created by a human it has more "soul" for lack of a better term. AI art is bland, cold, and lifeless.
Click to expand...
I've seen AI depict very niche and straight-up impressive porn pieces. A furry character with natural red fade towards their nipples/dick, fat but in the way muscle artists usually draw, balls full of hand prints and whatever else vore type shit furries are into.

Now, ask an artist to do that. They'll upcharge you 30% cause "I don't like vore" on top of a $250 ask for a piece that'll take 7 days to 3 years.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: The Jewel of the Nile, Big Fish, Dunkin DoNUT and 4 others
⋖ cørdion ⋗ said:
I've seen AI depict very niche and straight-up impressive porn pieces. A furry character with natural red fade towards their nipples/dick, fat but in the way muscle artists usually draw, balls full of hand prints and whatever else vore type shit furries are into.
Click to expand...
Horrifying. And kind of suspect. But unsurprising. Where there is a pattern you can teach the AI to replicate it. Even the most ludicrous and unorthodox of things.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: lolcow yoghurt, Dunkin DoNUT and Sean Shemmy
linchan said:
Furries are making the most God wincing images conceptualized with AI too. If I'm honest with you, this is not something we can pin on furries.
Click to expand...
I don't know, in my anecdotal experience they are the most militant and unhinged Anti-AI posters.
Not saying there aren't furries who use AI also. But the ones that are against it are fucking RABID.
 
  • Like
Reactions: make_it_so, Dunkin DoNUT, Autistic Gunspergings and 3 others
Kiwisee said:
>AI is now copyright striking AI content

Is it over?
Click to expand...
Expanding on this train of thought:

The AI copyright wars in the near future are going to provide bountiful content to laugh at, if only because I doubt it’s going to stay in the public’s hands for long.

Free generators will become a thing of the past in a couple years or so, because the companies hosting them will start demanding subscription fees- and only allow a few images or videos to be created a day. They’ve all invested billions into AI, and are only making around $30-40 million in return. It’s naive to think these corporations aren’t going to start aggressively monetizing the people who use their services.

Back to copyright, several lawsuits are being filed against these companies every month for scraping their content to use in its data system. While nothing is coming out of them for now, all it will take is a major record label to start going after these music generators once people start selling knock off albums claiming to be a famous musician.

Theoretically, at the moment, you could make a fake knock off Taylor Swift album and sell copies of it online without legal punishment of any sort. There’s enough Swifties out there who can’t pick up on AI generated content. It’s all fun and games until Taylor’s record company wants a cut of the profits, and decide to sue.

All in all, I can see mega corporations like Disney and Sony wanting to keep the AI technology to themselves. Copyright striking/lawsuits will be the most likely outcome. Then, other companies will follow suit until the common person cannot access AI generated content without paying an arm and a leg for it.
 
  • Lunacy
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Toolbox, Horribadger and Inco G. Nito
Mr. Blerg said:
I don't know, in my anecdotal experience they are the most militant and unhinged Anti-AI posters.
Not saying there aren't furries who use AI also. But the ones that are against it are fucking RABID.
Click to expand...
This is because of the purpose of the art. It's not meant to be beautiful or cohesive or poignant or thought-provoking, it's meant to illustrate characters doing something degenerate. Even amateurish scribbles can be wank material to a furry, but now those scribbles don't have to be tolerated anymore.

Fine art isn't threatened by AI because quality and technique is important and AI isn't quite up to that task. Also the artist's purpose in making the piece is part of the "story" of the art that gives it its value.

Commercial art is threatened in the sense that you can do it with AI now, but those people were already making slop for money, they'll just shrug and gladly use AI to get the work done faster. No one would mourn them if they took to social media to complain about replacement.

Other sectors like entertainment are waiting to see how things shake out but are generally in favor of doing things more efficiently.

Furries are one of the few communities where the purpose of the art is utilitarian and easily automated, but also with a highly social aspect, hierarchies with the artists on top as the only ones able to provide what their masses craved. They are absolutely panicking that they're no longer needed.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: The Jewel of the Nile, Toolbox, make_it_so and 11 others
Runch said:
This is because of the purpose of the art. It's not meant to be beautiful or cohesive or poignant or thought-provoking, it's meant to illustrate characters doing something degenerate. Even amateurish scribbles can be wank material to a furry, but now those scribbles don't have to be tolerated anymore.
Click to expand...

Which is pretty much why a good deal of content on places like DeviantART is just MS Paint chicken scratch or recolored bases, or both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssaneenah and Big Fish
Temmie said:
I have standards.
Click to expand...

professionals have standards.jpeg



1). Be polite.
2). Be efficient!
3). Have a plan to goon to everyone you meet.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: NSJAP, ssaneenah, Toolbox and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back