Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[demicolon]

Modafinil abuse would explain his manic appearance on prior streams, his being awake in the early hours and shaking hands.

Awake in early hours and shaking hands are more symptoms of prolonged alcohol abuse.

No, not at all. Modafinil and Armodafinil don't induce euphoria or mania.

t. Been on modafinil for over a decade.

They don't unless you overdose. I know someone who had years of experience with stimulants and would take 4 pills of armodafinil at once (4 x 150mg) for funsies, he said it's very similar to amphetamine but you're not going to sleep this night, and maybe the night after.

 

[Capt. Jean Luc Ritard]

No, not at all. Modafinil and Armodafinil don't induce euphoria or mania.

t. Been on modafinil for over a decade.

yeah which is why they both suck

 

[Procrastinhater]

1. There were multiple tests performed.

2. If subsequent testing came back negative for cocaine, Nick would certainly have told us.

Ergo, the very safe bet is that Nick Rekieta’s eight year old child tested positive for cocaine multiple times.

It’s not complicated at all, despite Nick’s attempts to make it appear so.

That's what I figured must have happened but it's good to get confirmation, I always figured if the kid had popped positive, wouldn't they have automatically tested it again to make sure it wasn't an anomaly or a fault?
Makes sense that they did.

And it also makes sense that if any of those subsequpent tests had come back negative that skelly fag would have been waving that test about triumphant whenever anyone brought it up. The fact he doesn't, and just repeats "it doesn't make sense" is as good as him admitting it.

 

[AnOminous]

but how does that work if the hearing is tuesday? doesn't nick have to enter a plea by tuesday and that's that? i didn't think the state could slow down the process to consider/reconsider a plea deal pending investigation of another potential crime. just not sure about the timeline here.

They can take a plea off the table for any reason or no reason. They're not even obligated to offer one at all. Even when they have a rule that they have to make an offer, it can be "plead guilty to everything and we'll fuck your shit up anyway."

 

[Telvanni]

No, not at all. Modafinil and Armodafinil don't induce euphoria or mania.

t. Been on modafinil for over a decade.

I only ever felt Provigil work the very first day and nothing after.
Tried Adderall and Ritalin too.
Honestly, a good night rest + lots of water upon waking then coffee does more for me.

Oh...this is a Rekieta thread
Yeah, he's openly bragged about living off Modafinil.

 

[Captain Manning]

Everything else I wrote talks about how bad Rekieta is as a client though. Which if you follow the logic, I'm trying to say they shouldn't be so hard on the lawyers. They're doing an impossible task.

Then he should advise Nick to plea out. He also shouldn't have taken the case. He's called a Barneswalker for a reason. He took this case to make his fat bloviating e-daddy happy. Not because he felt Nick actually had a defense.

The difference between Randazza and White is that Randazza actually put forward an argument that kinda worked, but not enough to win.

White didn't even do that. As near as a anybody can tell, White is taking Nick's money, spraying diarrhea on paper, and then filing it with the court. The results thus far have been disastrous.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Or would that count as cow tipping?

Even if it didn't count as cow tipping, don't spread the memetic hazard. The citizens of Kandiyohi are already at risk, no reason to guarantee infection.

Spoiler

 

[I Will Be Us]

Speaking of, Nick is still going pretty hard. Defending his love of his kids and the drugging seem to be all he's done online for the past two days.

(Also, archive.today and archive.ph never load for me and the archival thread isn't giving many alternatives on Tweets. Sorry, I'm trying here).

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

The results thus far have been disastrous.

For the defendant, absolutely. For the punters, it’s a show worthy of LOTY.

 

[AnOminous]

Everything else I wrote talks about how bad Rekieta is as a client though. Which if you follow the logic, I'm trying to say they shouldn't be so hard on the lawyers. They're doing an impossible task.

I don't know about they, but Barneswalker's pleadings are just bad, not even competent. The colossal blunder by omission of not even arguing probable cause at all is not justifiable by any professional standard, nor is failing to address the central issue of what justifies immediate review of an interlocutory order.

Randazza by comparison almost won a nearly impossible argument. It was a dumb argument to spend time and money making, but that was Nick's choice. I'll note he also knew how to draft an interlocutory appeal, although he had the advantage of making a novel argument based on a quasi-immunity theory, i.e. SLAPP. Those generally get heard, because immunity is the right not to stand trial at all, so if you have to stand trial, that's the harm that can't be rectified after trial.

The client is the captain of the case, as they say, but that doesn't mean the lawyer is absolved of all obligations of competence. He doesn't get to throw his hands in the air and cry "my client is an idiot so I'll do a shit job."

 

[ChromaQuack]

Modafinil and Armodafinil don't induce euphoria or mania.

Not Quite Correct

It's just rare and often presents itself when other comorbidities exist, if Nicky is treating his depression with some other drug it upgrades his chances. If he's being given mood stabilizers it (ironically) upgrades his chances.

Then again, considering just how many drugs this skellington is at any given time you'd have an easier time picking a needle from a haystack than finding out just which one is causing him to tweak out.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

yeah which is why they both suck

If you're trying to get high, sure. Otherwise, they're absolutely fantastic. If you're a night shifter or work weird hours it's a godsend. You can be productive and alert and not be a fucking cracked out junkie.

4 pills of armodafinil at once (4 x 150mg)

I have no idea how anyone could do this and have fun. I'm getting a migraine just thinking about it. Jesus Christ.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Speaking of, Nick is still going pretty hard. Defending his love of his kids and the drugging seem to be all he's done online for the past two days.

Nick could stop this conversation in its tracks by showing proof of subsequent negative drug tests.

Nick doesn’t have any negative tests to share, only positive tests (hair follicle AND blood tests).

That’s why he’s scrambling for excuses. He’s a liar, we know he’s a liar, he knows we know he’s a liar. But as we also know, Nick is constitutionally incapable of being honest.

 

[AnOminous]

I have no idea how anyone could do this and have fun. I'm getting a migraine just thinking about it. Jesus Christ.

My guess is you're not a hardcore druggie which is a good thing. I think you underestimate how serious druggies can somehow turn almost anything into a drug of abuse.

There are people who literally turn into IMODIUM junkies. Yes, the anti-diarrhea medication, because its mechanism of action is it's a weak opioid.

I think it's more likely Nick is just on plain old meth and booze, but he's probably also the kind of garbagehead who will gobble any pill that gets within gobbling distance.

 

[Captain Manning]

Randazza by comparison almost won a nearly impossible argument. It was a dumb argument to spend time and money making, but that was Nick's choice. I'll note he also knew how to draft an interlocutory appeal, although he had the advantage of making a novel argument based on a quasi-immunity theory, i.e. SLAPP. Those generally get heard, because immunity is the right not to stand trial at all, so if you have to stand trial, that's the harm that can't be rectified after trial.

I believe that Randazza thought that Nick had a shot. A long-shot, but a shot nonetheless. He did the very best he could, and almost pulled it off.

It's difficult to explain White's actions other than he's flailing around trying to make Barnes happy. All to the determent of his client. He has yet to put forward anything even approaching a good argument.

I have no quarrel with people who respect Randazza, but White? I don't see the same qualities in White. Lawyers have to represent all sorts of scum, and it's true that scum shouldn't necessarily rub off on the lawyer, but it I think it's acceptable to call them out when the represent scum with boneheaded arguments that have no chance of working.

 

[ye's Official KF Burner]

Nick could stop this conversation in its tracks by showing proof of subsequent negative drug tests.

Nick doesn’t have any negative tests to share, only positive tests (hair follicle AND blood tests).

That’s why he’s scrambling for excuses. He’s a liar, we know he’s a liar, he knows we know he’s a liar. But as we also know, Nick is constitutionally incapable of being honest.

It would be funny if they weren't showing him the results and then they drop all of it on his head when the court date rolls around

 

[Sam Losco]

Well this is WEIRD.
I was watching Scott Manley's analysis of yesterday's Starship flight 6 and when he showed a screenshot from X, I recognized someone.


No relevance really, just surprising.

Back to current discussion, @Potentially Criminal, regarding your last post, have you ever had to represent another lawyer? If so, did they make suggestions or let you run it?

 

[Vibralldo]

View attachment 6666313

Speaking of, Nick is still going pretty hard. Defending his love of his kids and the drugging seem to be all he's done online for the past two days.

(Also, archive.today and archive.ph never load for me and the archival thread isn't giving many alternatives on Tweets. Sorry, I'm trying here).

Nick thinks that he's the pinnacle of health



I wouldn't trust him when he says his daughter was healthy


https://ghostarchive.org/ is very good for archiving tweets

 

[Artificial Stupidity]

Ok here me out, Nick says he's rejected a plea deal and is awaiting a better offer from my understanding.
What does Nick fear more than anything? From what it seems it's the bodycam footage.

What if he's only going to plea guilty if the bodycam footage isn't released?

 

[ChromaQuack]

Ok here me out, Nick says he's rejected a plea deal and is awaiting a better offer from my understanding.
What does Nick fear more than anything? From what it seems it's the bodycam footage.

What if he's only going to plea guilty if the bodycam footage isn't released?

I don't think he has any plan, it will all depend on the level of drug-fueled psychosis he's on at the particular moment he gets to say yes or no to the deal.