Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 123 36.7%

  • Total voters
    335
View attachment 6666929

I am monummetally behind, but here is something to discuss.

I forgive you all for adding 30 pages to my backlog...

Nick is doing is usual combination of telling a partial truth and lying at the same time. Right about now is NOT COINCIDENTIALLY just about exactly six months since the CPS process began. What has probably happened is that Nick and Kayla survived that six month hearing by having done everything that CPS requested. They don't lose custody of the children.

Contrary to Nick's REPEATED claims over time, his idea of this magic "CASE CLOSED" thing where CPS just disappears forever from his life and he doesn't have to do anything further for them is entirely a delusion. It never works like that. Especially if you have dragged through an entire six-month process right to the end. They will continue to watch and require. Its what they do. Its the whole nature of what CPS is. The consequences of non-compliance are less, but there isn't a "case closed" day.

He is telling the truth about that sword over his head though if the six-month process had gone wrong for him. His claim that he had "physical custody on a trial home visit" is also incredibly cynically and predictably Nick. The way to read that is that they did the first trial visit to the home with the kids in August. Nick had "physical custody" of the kids when they were in the house for a visit in August. He is just SO CLEVER.
 
Of course the most important part is Brent, his state assigned boyfriend/piss-watcher. He couldn't say something as important as getting his kids back without making some reference to how much of a faggot he is. Good job Nick, you'll only traumatize them again once you get grabbed on the computer fraud charges you added to your drug possession.
I was impressed by that too. He couldn't even declare victory over CPS (whether or not he is totally bullshit lying) without "MUH DICK!"

Can he talk about anything without bringing up his dick somehow?
 
I have an idea of what drug Nick might be doing that wouldn't be tested for. I think it's likely he's using something like Gabapentin. Gabapentin is sometimes prescribed for anxiety (Kayla could pretty likely have prescription for it) and for helping people get off alcohol (Nick could have a prescription for it). They're a good alternative to benzos because they are a good deal less addictive. Higher dosages are given commonly for seizures. At low doses (usually under 600mg, often given at 300mg) it helps reduce anxiety and can aid sleep. But Gabapentin has a moderate abuse potential because at the higher dosages you get alcohol-like effects.

I'm guessing that either Nick or Kayla (or both) has a prescription for 600mg twice a day, and Nick is slamming something like 2400mg (or more) at once. This would result in behaviour that looks very much like being drunk, while also allowing him to piss clean. If they tested for Gabapentin (which is rare) he could just say he has a prescription.
 
View attachment 6666929

I am monummetally behind, but here is something to discuss.

I forgive you all for adding 30 pages to my backlog...
I can't believe this is happening. So The kids are back to being raised by 3 junkies (Don't forget about April bragging about maintaining her caregiver role) without any restraints on their drug use? Has he provided any paperwork to prove this claim?
 
I can't believe this is happening. So The kids are back to being raised by 3 junkies (Don't forget about April bragging about maintaining her caregiver role) without any restraints on their drug use? Has he provided any paperwork to prove this claim?

He survived the six-month process for CPS, cooperated and did not lose his kids. As has been said many times, the whole CPS process is about trying to get the parents to cooperate at whatever level they are able to and keep from permently taking away the kids. He is pretending that his junkie side-whore is a battered woman sheltering for safety in a property he owns.

And contrary to what he has said, the CPS process just don't magically end one day. There is not the immediately threat of losing the kids completely anymore and the compliance they can force through that, but they continue to watch. Once you are on their radar as a junkie parent, you don't just get forgotten.
 
Nick is doing is usual combination of telling a partial truth and lying at the same time. Right about now is NOT COINCIDENTIALLY just about exactly six months since the CPS process began. What has probably happened is that Nick and Kayla survived that six month hearing by having done everything that CPS requested. They don't lose custody of the children.

Contrary to Nick's REPEATED claims over time, his idea of this magic "CASE CLOSED" thing where CPS just disappears forever from his life and he doesn't have to do anything further for them is entirely a delusion. It never works like that. Especially if you have dragged through an entire six-month process right to the end. They will continue to watch and require. Its what they do. Its the whole nature of what CPS is. The consequences of non-compliance are less, but there isn't a "case closed" day.

He is telling the truth about that sword over his head though if the six-month process had gone wrong for him. His claim that he had "physical custody on a trial home visit" is also incredibly cynically and predictably Nick. The way to read that is that they did the first trial visit to the home with the kids in August. Nick had "physical custody" of the kids when they were in the house for a visit in August. He is just SO CLEVER.
And it can go back to the kid's being taken away and put at a guardian's home in a moments notice.
For example the retard addict faggot father having his house raided a second time and new charges filed against himself, one of which could include conspiring to sexually harass a minor together with a greasy fat ethical-CP-enjoyer from Las Vegas.

The person Nick is lying the most to is himself.
 
View attachment 6666929

I am monummetally behind, but here is something to discuss.

I forgive you all for adding 30 pages to my backlog...
I don't want to be that guy, but I want proof of life, with today's newspapers and all. Send it to Sean or another trusted 3rd party for all I care I don't need to see the kids, but I don't belive this for a fucking second.
 
Its from the initial petition from May 24:
"It was confirmed by the older children that if their tests were positive, it was because they were exposed to someone else using drugs."

I see, so now Nick has taken the older children's paraphrased claims in the petition as proof that the county coached them to claim that someone else exposed them to drugs if they tested positive. Nick also claimed that since his six-year old doesn't talk that way and neither can his oldest children (eldest being around 17) because he thinks it's believable that a self-described libertarian lawyer who regularly used/kept cocaine and ketamine in his own home wouldn't train his eldest kids what to tell the police if they were interviewed by an authority.

How bizarre.

He's already on this shit about Aaron cum drinking, and if he's following his usual MO of all the shit he accuses other people of being projection, (nerds, cucks, etc) he's probably got the same taste in cocktails as that cuck Steve Bonnell.

During Nick's cooking stream he talked about how Trump was able to effectively and simply brand his opposition. It is likely that his nerd/dork fixation is an attempt at doing the same (like the Democrats' attempt at the "weird" banding that never really took off).

Kayla's a Dork

On the subject of nerds and dorks, when Aaron talked about the names for the Qover I found it odd that he couldn't remember Kayla's. My initial suspicion was that it was likely a somewhat backhanded term of "affection" that Aaron was uncomfortable mentioning (he was still sweet on her that the time).

Nick would sometimes refer to Kayla in insulting ways on his show ("monster" or "that thing") with an affectionate tone. Kayla would always give him a disapproving look while he tried to soften the blow with a smile before moving on.

Then there's this:

008.008.2 2023-11-01.jpeg

Nick casually giving Kayla a backhanded descriptors under the pretense of being "loving" combined with his cryptic way of telling on himself makes it very possible that Kayla's Qover name, as assigned by Nick in the privacy of his bathroom with their bedmates, drugs, and the pug, was actually Dork.

008.008.1 2024-10-26 Kayla's Qodename is Dork.jpg
 
Nick casually giving Kayla a backhanded descriptors under the pretense of being "loving" combined with his cryptic way of telling on himself makes it very possible that Kayla's Qover name, as assigned by Nick in the privacy of his bathroom with their bedmates, drugs, and the pug, was actually Dork.
That's the sort of thing that can be affectionate, but with this scumbag, it's one of those veiled negging insults PUAs use. Nick is a piece of shit.
 
I won't bother doing a bunch of quoting here, but I agree with the kid testing positive being legit. They will retest an 8 year old. This isn't gonna be some shit where they just do one quick test and wing it. Nick claiming he wouldnt face more serious charges is bullshit, because it would be rolled into endangerment or something else. Why? You can't really prove how the kid got the drugs, but you can prove that it was a result of negligent parenting. Nick has a big fuckin mouth too so if there was another test and anything ever came back anything besides positive, he would be swearing up and down all over the place about it.
While hair tests taken after the initial test would have continued to read positive for some time, it's likely that subsequent testing was done using urine or saliva and you would expect those tests to read negative days after last exposure. Negative results would indicate that she stopped testing positive after removal from the home so they wouldn't be favourable for Nick.

Nick's only real hope would have been to have the original sample tested independently (the original sample is divided as a matter of course and the untested portion is retained for a period of time) or request that a new sample be taken and independently tested soon after the children were removed (this sample should also have been submitted to the original lab if their testing methods and results were going to be challenged). That he did neither speaks volumes.
 
View attachment 6666929

I am monummetally behind, but here is something to discuss.

I forgive you all for adding 30 pages to my backlog...
Screw the alogs, I'm so proud of you Nick. Completing not-rehab, getting yo keedz back and sheeeet, you're a real winner. Hey, you know what winners do? They celebrate! Why don't you take a wander down to the second house and find those bottles you 'threw out' and live it up like a champion, you deserve it! And hey, once you've revelled in your glory for a few moments, you can boot up a stream just like old times and set the record straight. Everyone would be so owned to hear every meticulous detail of your case buddy!
 
Now those fuckin faggots on the Kiwi Farms can't make fun of me for losing my keeds! Take that Johm Potter, you fuckin' peedafile! :diddler:


Oh, sorry. I meant:

Now those, uh. kiwifags, don't have any reason to call me a deadbeat dad. Take that, Josh. You fucking autistic retard! (Posted from an iPhone 16 in the shower) :really:
 
Back