- Joined
- Jul 18, 2020
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're conventional HE warheads as use on the Iskander missile but the missile being 25 times the cost of a Iskander.That clearly wasn't a nuke though. If it was that missile they put some kind of goofy non-nuclear warhead/RVs on it.
Is this my turn to start bitching about wasted tax money?They're conventional HE warheads as use on the Iskander missile but the missile being 25 times the cost of a Iskander.
If not an ICBM, it's likely to be an IRBM [intermediate range ballistic missile] or a SRBM [short range ballistic missile].
USA doesn't watch launches like this with Radars. It detects the thermal plume at the launch site and then extrapolates based on movement where the missile is going. It will dissappear from thermal as it hits orbit and begins its terminal phase.But apparently, another launch from the same area has been detected.
Edit: IT DISAPPEARED FROM RADARS.
One of the moments where "ACKSHUALLY" is warranted. Yes, I used a retarded figure of speech, thank you for correcting me.USA doesn't watch launches like this with Radars. It detects the thermal plume at the launch site and then extrapolates based on movement where the missile is going. It will dissappear from thermal as it hits orbit and begins its terminal phase.
Radar picks it up later as the delivery vehicles angles back in to hit the target. So it didn't dissappear from radar. It never was on radar. It disappeared from thermal detection.
It's not wasted, it's spent on collective security of all Russians, instead of creature comforts for degenerate liberals.Is this my turn to start bitching about wasted tax money?
All of it tbqh. They are starting to get down to the scrap metal tier tanks that have been rotting in fields. As for the Ammo stockpiles, well they North Korean ammo now. So yeah.How much Soviet legacy are they eating up in all of this
All the western coverage I see is people losing their minds over "ICBM's" and talking about escalation. Doesn't seem much different from the previous missile attacks to me, except for the fact that it's more expensive. It was probably aimed to generate spooky headlines in western media and to reassure assorted ziggers.>Blowing your Intercontinental Missiles on the same continent
Bruh, this isn't a statement of strength. Looks like the new cope will "true power unleashed" but what I'm seeing is another dead cat bounce.
Is this my turn to start bitching about wasted tax money?
The soy Western "heckin' nuclear escalationerino" vs the chad Russian taxpayer.All the western coverage I see is people losing their minds over "ICBM's" and talking about escalation. Doesn't seem much different from the previous missile attacks to me, except for the fact that it's more expensive. It was probably aimed to generate spooky headlines in western media and to reassure assorted ziggers.
These things are very effective against unworthy politicians (the type who does not want to take risks at any cost) and the primed portions of the Western electorate. All the 5th colon blue checkmarks are squealing about WW III to their cattle, who in turn demand politicians act on their totally organic and well informed fears, and many are perfectly happy to run on that sentiment, wherever it comes from and whatever harm basing policy on it will cause.But nobody believes Russia wants too, so it's meaningless posturing.
They might know a guy or two at NATO who can give them a heads up.So fun fact: If it's an ICBM you can "see" it coming. Ukraine doesn't have the ability to "see" ICBM launches but NATO does. It wasn't a fucking ICBM.