- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
He wasIf he wasn't one before
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He wasIf he wasn't one before
Also, lol at Greta culling her supporters off. If I were a troll on her page, I'd be saying stuff like "signal boosting the shit out of this" and blabbering about whiteness checkpoints to egg her insanity on/delegitimize her viewpoints (sorta what Phil's posts do), not trying to give her constructive criticism.
Something like "Chell." It's a Scandinavian name.
On that note, I wish I were clever enough to write a Greta parody ... "Norwegian Troon," after the Beatles song.
We deport da homos to Iran all the time, pogrom or not.Powerlevel: I got a relative up to speed on this case, since he's a federal agent that operates closely with ICE in the course of his duties. He tells me that the split second Greta or Nina misses a hearing or summons is not only aneed immediate deportation order, as covered earlier, but likely to spark a further investigation on Greta since the proper marriage and immigration paperwork from the past had never been completed properly. He said, and I'm paraphrasing, that the current administration and the incoming administration are extremely unlikely to allow leeway in a case like this, since it's well known in the international community that India doesn't do pogroms or purges of trans people. If we were talking Iraq or Iran or Arabistan, that would be different since being anything but a heterosexual Muslim in those countries runs a strong risk of being thrown off a building or beheaded.
I would also add that India is already pretty tolerant of transsexuals in any decent sized city, and the country has a history of tolerating androgynous public dancers.
So, english is not my first language, and I had a bit trouble understanding all that law-talk.
Am I understanding the situation right that basically nothing has changed except Nina is out of custody.
Still unrealistic that he can stay in the U.S.? Thanks!
So, english is not my first language, and I had a bit trouble understanding all that law-talk.
Am I understanding the situation right that basically nothing has changed except Nina is out of custody.
Still unrealistic that he can stay in the U.S.? Thanks!
So, english is not my first language, and I had a bit trouble understanding all that law-talk.
Am I understanding the situation right that basically nothing has changed except Nina is out of custody.
Still unrealistic that he can stay in the U.S.? Thanks!
Wouldn't the money flow need to be like in the 6 figures?Pretty much. Government is likely to pursue deportation, while Nina pursues an asylum claim. If the money keeps flowing, and Nina doesn't fuck up again during the process, the asylum adjudication could take years from the initial decision (likely a deportation order) to the denial of the final appeal.
the asylum adjudication could take years
Wouldn't the money flow need to be like in the 6 figures?
Depends on the lawyer and how far it goes. If lets say Nina's CF is denied, or the eventual asylum claim is denied by an IJ you get into appeal territory and six figures then isn't out of the question when it gets that far into the weeds due to sheer time and complexity involved. But for the moment, given what we know about the case, I'm calling a $5,000- $10,000 retainer and then probably another $10,00o to $20,000 to get to and through the individual merit hearing, if they are lucky, everything is routine and nothing complex comes up pursuing the defensive asylum claim.Wouldn't the money flow need to be like in the 6 figures?
So how tough on El Nino can we expect Chicago immigration judges to be compared to the ones in Arizona or California that have already been brought up?
So how tough on El Nino can we expect Chicago immigration judges to be compared to the ones in Arizona or California that have already been brought up?