Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 31.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 31 11.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 86 32.3%

  • Total voters
    266
POV: You're the first animal to fall asleep at the Rekieta sleepover.
BFEF48-2903bf0-e1726061225112.jpg
 
This is the biggest reason why I think there is going to be a divorce arc. Nick's reaction to negative attention is to double down and rub it in people's faces that he can do what he wants. Kayla's reaction to negative attention is to run and hide. She's susceptible to public opinion and desperately wants people to like her. She left the internet when people started criticizing her leads. She went so far as to name their polycule the Qover, because they were all supposed to help each other maintain proper social standing despite their debauchery.

She set herself up with social circles where being a good mother is mandatory (homeschool and church). The amount of judgment she has to feel being exposed the way she has, with the real life consequences attached, has to have been a major trauma for her. She's always going to have the fact that she lost her children to CPS hanging over her head. She's going to freak out at the thought of Nick going back down that road and doing it publicly.
Maybe I'm just a gay-ass optimistic. I really hope that Kayla wants to be a good mother just for the sake of being a good mother. Maybe Nick just dragged her into all of this, and since she had married to him for so long, she just went along with it. Call me whatever you want, but I genuinely am rooting for Kayla to do the right thing.
 
And what is more important is that these stories came from NICK HIMSELF! Even if they are a fabrication (I doubt he killed a raccoon in a shed with a hammer and chisel), this is what NICK wanted us to know! FUNNY and WEIRD, am I right!?
You'd be shocked what people do to animals, unfortunately. One of my parrots is a rescued cockatiel who is older than I am. In his late 30s. His original owner would hit him and do things to hurt him. I remember asking the lady when I adopted him, "How can someone hit a bird!? They have hollow bones!". He's got some permanent injuries from being hit. He has a weak jaw and likes to dip his pellets in water to soften them up so he can eat them. He's not airworthy and doesn't know how to fly, even though I don't clip any of my birds wings. He was hit and kept in a cage the size of a fucking lunchbox. And cockatiels cost like $400! If a person could do that to a creature they spent all that money to own, don't underestimate how cruel people can be to animals.
 
Godspeed, you mysterious masked Kiwi, and thank you for your service.

Coining what would probably be the most iconic one-liner of 2024
is something else that I believe should be explicitly mentioned.

2024's Top Online One-Liner.jpg

Pure thrill for anyone reading this thread,
irrespective of known lore, religious beliefs or Sekturgate affiliations.

Especially for Limp Dickieta.
It will be noted by historians of the future
that the sight of that green M broke him for real.-
 
Also, his excuse for not just shooting the skunk is that it would explode and the smell would be spread everywhere. Maybe if you're shooting it straight through the scent glands with a fucking Desert Eagle or a shotgun.
A .223 (which we know he owned) will not "explode" a skunk or racoon. It's literally derived from a varmint cartridge (the older .222 Remington). A lot of people consider it borderline for larger things like deer.

There is a possibility the skunk will spray up to 12 feet in its death spasms, but that's why you shoot it from a distance.

There is no legitimate reason why he killed either animal in the manner he did, and then bragged about it.

But I also think this subject has been done to death by now. You can always tell when this thread is waiting for the next thing to happen. That'd be Monday and Tuesday.
 
A .223 (which we know he owned) will not "explode" a skunk or racoon. It's literally derived from a varmint cartridge (the older .222 Remington). A lot of people consider it borderline for larger things like deer.

There is a possibility the skunk will spray up to 12 feet in its death spasms, but that's why you shoot it from a distance.

There is no legitimate reason why he killed either animal in the manner he did, and then bragged about it.

But I also think this subject has been done to death by now. You can always tell when this thread is waiting for the next thing to happen. That'd be Monday and Tuesday.
Come on Monday!!
 
A .223 (which we know he owned) will not "explode" a skunk or racoon. It's literally derived from a varmint cartridge (the older .222 Remington). A lot of people consider it borderline for larger things like deer.

There is a possibility the skunk will spray up to 12 feet in its death spasms, but that's why you shoot it from a distance.

There is no legitimate reason why he killed either animal in the manner he did, and then bragged about it.

But I also think this subject has been done to death by now. You can always tell when this thread is waiting for the next thing to happen. That'd be Monday and Tuesday.
I believe his excuse was that there was once a skunk inside his house and he shot it, which caused it to explode and coat the room in it's stench. I'm pretty sure that never actually happened.
 
I believe his excuse was that there was once a skunk inside his house and he shot it, which caused it to explode and coat the room in it's stench. I'm pretty sure that never actually happened.
Yeah, that sounds like absolute bullshit. Like so many other things he's claimed.
 
And what is more important is that these stories came from NICK HIMSELF! Even if they are a fabrication (I doubt he killed a raccoon in a shed with a hammer and chisel), this is what NICK wanted us to know! FUNNY and WEIRD, am I right!?
Nick could defend himself and claim none of these things he says about himself were true. Because he was just LYING. Because he's a LIAR!

Does anyone even believe this outlandish raccoon hammer story? I mean, because that raccoon would have taken that hammer and rammed it up Nick's ass and then mauled his face, because Nick is a WEAK FAGGOT!
 
"I hate David because I AM DAVID."
Talk about delusions of grandeur. Rekieta must compare himself to some important biblical figure, showing his narcissism again.
If You have never watched the Lori Vallow-Chad Daybell TRIALS, THIS HERE is the EXACT same De-LOO-ZEE-UNZ of Grandeur those cult-like psycho Religious Elitests had as well. Those two murderers [who killed family and kids] CONSTANTLY compared themselves to RELIGIOUS ICONS from their Mormon religion TOO. Those two psychos were always a PAST LIFE re-incarnation of someone FAMOUS, someone NOTABLE in their religion, never just the stable boy shoveling shit.

The Baldo will rear its ugly HEAD, in trial maybe, just like AMBER TURD tweets appeared. The Degeneracy of a junkie-child/abusing addict is always relevant to prove a lack of any boundaries for things brought into a home with 5 kids. Drug seeking degeneracy. Oh look, that safe aint mine, that mountsin of coke aint mine CUZ I dont do coke but look at all the shit I FAILED TO LEAVE AT THE DOOR because I am a junkie huffin whippets with holes in my brain.

Dear Diarrhea....
I AM A GOLDEN GAWD.
I will turn my Minnesota 6 into a puddle.

Now jump, junkie.
JUMP
 
Last edited:
If You have never watched the Lori Vallow-Chad Daybell TRIALS, THIS HERE is the EXACT same De-LOO-Loo-ZEE-UNZ of Grandeur those cult-like psycho Religious Elists had as weel. Those two CONSTANTLY compared themselves to RELIGIOUS ICONS in their Mormon religion TOO. Those two psychos were always a PAST LIFE re-incarnation of someone FAMOUS, someone NOTABLE in their religion. Never just the stable boy shoveling shit.

Baldo will rear its ugly HEAD just like AMBER TURD tweets appeared. The Degeneracy of a junkie-child/abusing addict is always relevant to prove a lack of non-addict boundaries of things brought into a home with 5 kids. Drug seeking degeneracy. Oh look, that safe aint mine, that mountsin of coke aint mine CUZ I dont do coke but look at all the shit I FAILED TO LEAVE AT THE DOOR because I am a junkie huffin whippets with holes in my brain.

Dear Diarrhea....
Did Rackets slip you some of his special powder before you typed this?
 
Apparently, Nick would like everybody to know he drinks his own jizz. Ala CWC.

Screenshot_20241123-201441~2.png
Archive

He can't be talking about Aaron, because I have yet to see Aaron go "fucking insane" and start saying "crazy shit online." At most, Aaron has been a little too mouthy when maybe he shouldn't be.

Nick, on the other hand...
 
You can always tell when this thread is waiting for the next thing to happen
In that spirit, I've been sitting on a question. It might be as silly as Baptists and David.
Have any of the drug experts done a pupil analysis?
1732408743124.png
1732408782594.png
1732409067007.png
Same room, same lighting, right? Mugshot, so a few hours after the arrest. Google says MDMA, meth, stimulants, and coke can last that long. Anyway, Nick seems higher. (I couldn't see April's eyes well enough to tell anything.)
 
Already posted, but more evidence in favor of the divorce saga. Either means "polyamory ruined my marriage" or "I'm happier being exclusive with April"View attachment 6678821
You have to close read everything he writes. Even then he'll lie but it's pretty much guaranteed that anything is a lie of implication or omission.

Example - his tweet sounds like marriage advice regarding infidelity and a good marriage:

Monogamy is the best recipe for marriage

1) The close reading of "monogamy" is a single spouse. Nick will insist that he is "monogamous" because Kayla is the only person he is married to. He's "monogamous" despite fucking jamaican prostitutes in front of his wife.

2). In his statement, he didn't qualify marriage. Didn't say "happy" or "failed." just "recipe for marriage."

As it stands, that whole statement is just rephrasing US law that a person can only be married to one person at a time.

Another close reading of his previous tweet. He said he only saw April 3 times in 60 days. 2 were platonic in group setting. He does not explicitly say the 3rd time was platonic. Nor did he say it was a group. We know that his address was different for at least 30 of those days according to court paperwork but no reason was given. He wants the reader to believe that he chooses to no longer see April. He never says that it is his choice though.
 
Back