Ursula Haverbeck (1928-2024): warrior for truth

https://www.heritageanddestiny.com/ursula-haverbeck-1928-2024-warrior-for-truth/ (A)
Posted on November 20, 2024 by admin978

​

"The great German patriot, writer, publisher, and educator Ursula Haverbeck has died, less than a fortnight after her 96th birthday. The occupation government that calls itself the Federal Republic of Germany was seeking to jail Ursula right up to the instant of her death.

Though born in western Germany, Ursula was living in East Prussia as a young girl until it was overrun by Stalin’s Red Army, at which point she became a refugee, first in Sweden and then in the UK.

In 1963 she and her future husband Werner Haverbeck (a veteran national socialist academic) founded the Collegium Humanum – an educational institute based at their home in the northern German town of Vlotho.

This Collegium provided a wide range of educational and ideological training for several generations of Germans, with speakers including the intellectual founder of the modern European environmentalist movement, Dr E.F. Schumacher.

Ursula Haverbeck with fellow revisionist scholar Horst Mahler (now 8 who has also been jailed for his books and speeches on historical topics.​

In 1992 Ursula became active in an organisation seeking to build proper memorials for German civilian victims of the Second World War, whether victims of the terror-bombing campaign by the Western allies, or the campaign of mass rapes, murders and expulsions by their Soviet counterparts.

Though this might have been thought a simple acknowledgment of historical facts, Ursula attracted the hostile attention of German state authorities who wished to impose an authorised version of history.

Increasingly this state-imposed version of history has concentrated on criminalising any attempt to question the alleged ‘Holocaust’ of six million Jews in supposed homicidal gas chambers on the presumed orders of Adolf Hitler.

The inaugural Robert Faurisson International Prize was awarded to Ursula Haverbeck in 2019​

Historians, scientists and even lawyers who draw attention to serious evidential problems with the orthodox ‘Holocaust’ narrative were first demonised and driven out of their jobs, then criminalised, and increasingly subjected to long jail sentences.

Ursula herself was first fined for this invented thought-crime of ‘Holocaust denial’ – defined in Germany as Volksverhetzung, or ‘public incitement’ – in 2004. Almost ten years ago, as her revisionist activities continued, Professor Robert Faurisson noted that “at her own risk and peril, a great German lady has publicly opened the black box of ‘the Holocaust’. She has done so in the country which, along with Austria, is the most ruthless in Europe against historical revisionism.”

In 2019, three months after the Professor’s death, Ursula was awarded the inaugural Robert Faurisson International Prize at a ceremony in Vichy organised by the Italian tenor and revisionist campaigner Joe Fallisi. The prize was accepted on her behalf by her Berlin lawyer Wolfram Nahrath, because Ursula herself was by that time imprisoned.

Ursula Haverbeck with her friends and fellow campaigners Dr Rigolf Hennig (1935-2022) and Lady Michèle Renouf.​

During the last twenty years of her life, Ursula was repeatedly dragged into court, despite her advancing years, for the ‘crime’ of asking politely worded questions about ‘Holocaust’ history in letters to academics, politicians, and other public figures; for writing historical articles in magazines; and more recently for the ‘crime’ of answering questions in an online video interview.

From May 2018 until November 2020 Ursula served two and a half years in prison for such ‘crimes’, and in April 2022 she was sentenced to a further 12 months imprisonment.

Appeals against this sentence were turned down, and further cases continued this year in Hamburg. Right up until her death, Ursula was awaiting imprisonment – the main obstacle for the courts was finding a prison (even a prison hospital) that had appropriate facilities for a lady in her mid-90s!

Ursula Haverbeck with her indefatigable lawyer Wolfram Nahrath.​

Even in death, Ursula is feared by our enemies worldwide: less than two weeks ago, to give just one example, YouTube banned an H&D video that had been posted to mark her 96th birthday – although this video was simply an excerpt of an interview with Ursula that had been broadcast on a mainstream German television channel!

The good news – which Ursula knew and celebrated – is that this censorship is visibly failing. New generations of European patriots and intellectuals are challenging the lies that have been imposed on our continent for almost eighty years.

H&D will continue to honour Ursula’s legacy: an obituary will appear in our next edition.

Ursula’s campaign for historical truth has spread across Europe.
"​

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

Yes, the point of scientific analysis is to prove your assertion beyond any doubt. I'm glad you are slowly working through the definition of scientific analysis. Maybe you'll get to words like "credibility" next. Though I doubt it.

So you require deep analysis for something as clear as a burnt body part because it could possibly be something else but don't require the same sort of deep analysis when it's ifunny memes?

 

[Bonesjones]

So you require deep analysis for something as clear as a burnt body part because it could possibly be something else but don't require the same sort of deep analysis when it's ifunny memes?

I require proof of your assertions. So show me a gassed jew. Show me 900k bones and ash. The problem is you can't, you can only deflect from that and pretend you can control the conversation with your pilpul. What deep analysis is required of a LIDAR image of a camp that you agree existed? You even confirmed it being real then point to a tiny spec and say it's evidence of anything. Even though your own sources say they actively avoided doing scientific analysis. So again answer why when given the opportunity to scientifically prove your assertions, your don't. It's because you know the truth and it ain't what you want it to be.

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

What deep analysis is required of a LIDAR image of a camp that you agree existed?

You posted it claiming it shows no mass graves

You even confirmed it being real then point to a tiny spec and say it's evidence of anything.

I showed you where the researchers themselves said that there were mass graves

. Even though your own sources say they actively avoided doing scientific analysis.

But they still dug up human remains and identified where mass graves were. The scope of the research was to find additional structures which they did, it was not to analyze bodies or dig up mass graves

You've been reduced from saying that there was no Holocaust to saying yes there are burnt human remains at this camp but how do we know what actually killed them without scientific analysis

 

[Bonesjones]

You posted it claiming it shows no mass graves

Where is it then? You have a claim of a mass grave but you didn't actually dig it up and catalog it, so you have nothing.

I showed you where the researchers themselves said that there were mass graves

I don't care what they say, I want proof. They didn't do the actual research so their claims are bunk.

But they still dug up human remains and identified where mass graves were. The scope of the research was to find additional structures which they did, it was not to analyze bodies or dig up mass graves

How do we know they did?

So you admit they didnt actually do the research then, glad you figured out how to agree with me one more time.

You've been reduced from saying that there was no Holocaust to saying yes there are burnt human remains at this camp but how do we know what actually killed them without scientific analysis

I haven't been reduced to anything, you keep pretending like you've done or said anything except agree with me. So again, where are the gassed jews? Where are the bodies? You keep pretending they are there and refusing to show me directly. Why is that? It should be so simple to do, they've known exactly where they are so it's just a matter of putting together an archeological team to sort it out.

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

Where are the bodies?

>Researchers find human remains in a former death camp
>Some are burnt
>"Where are the bodies"

Ok

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-02002-4#ref-CR69

In 2019, archaeologists uncovered a clandestine mass burial pit that contained commingled human skeleton remains at the Execution Site of the former Treblinka I camp. It was estimated that there were a minimum of forty-nine people in the pit. Within months, an anthropologist performed biological profile assessments and detailed trauma analysis on the recovered skeletal parts. The main goal was to study perimortem trauma patterns to infer the cause and manner of death of the victims. We hypothesized that the victims did not die solely because of the camps’ conditions but were brutally slaughtered by the camp guards. Our results were later compared with the survivors’ written testimonies. As a result of our research, we were able to show that the Treblinka I captives’ death was extremely brutal and that the killing methods were varied. This led us to conclude that multiple assailants were involved in the killing spree. All of our results were consistent with the written witness testimonies, which concurs with our skeletal material analysis that proves the atrocities committed by the Nazis on their civilian prisoners during the war took place.

This skeletal material represents the hard evidence of atrocities committed by Treblinka camp guards on their prisoners. This is the first time since the first half of the twentieth century that victims’ remains have been physically examined. The non-invasive methods applied by scientists from 2007 contributed greatly to the knowledge of the spatial organization of the camp’s structure, as well as the possible location of some of the mass graves, but they cannot fully replace the standard archaeological excavation. Thanks to the trauma analysis results, we may infer that the victims were brutally beaten around the time of death. Many of them opposed the attack (as suggested by parry fractures and metacarpals’ fractures), which can indicate they knew what was going to happen to them. Some of the victims were likely killed by forcibly having their heads placed on a wooden block or a stone and hitting them with a tool such as a mallet. Others were hit on the top of their heads with a bat or a plank or a similar object. Some were shot in the back of their head and others were cut through the brain stem or beheaded. Interestingly, all of the noticed perimortem trauma lesions were later verified by survivors’ testimonies and were proven consistent.

The variety in the manner of death we observed can suggest that there were multiple assailants during the killing, and possibly the murders took place in various locations. The material that we examined was exhumed from only one of many clandestine mass burial pits on the Execution Site of the Treblinka camp. The archaeological survey shows there are several more graves nearby our exhumed pit.

 

[Bonesjones]

"It was estimated that there were a minimum of forty-nine people in the pit."

Where's the other 899,950 people? I thought we were doing genocide. Also what testing was done to ensure who and what and when? We know the NKVD used concentration camps for their own devices. Yet again you shift your burden of proof from genocide to "the Nazis are mean"

"As a result of our research, we were able to show that the Treblinka I captives’ death was extremely brutal and that the killing methods were varied."

So none of them were gassed. I guess you can't help deny the holocaust yet again. So again, where are your gassed jews?

"but they cannot fully replace the standard archaeological excavation."

Hey look there it is again. Not doing science and pretending it's science. When will you ever learn?

Also your study showing the Nazis to be brutal killers directly contradicts the narrative that they needed gas chambers to kill jews because they were so mentally scarred of having to kill jews. I guess if you just start with a narrative and try to make facts fit. You can make up any retarded information and torture the facts to fit.

 

[TJT]

The entire point here is that Jews hyperbolically propagandized all of this to the point of mind numbing absurdity. So much so that 80 years later faggots on the internet get butthurt at the very idea that the Second World War was in fact not solely about exterminating Jews and failing at it.

They have forced it into every Western education system. Leveraging their immensely outsized ownership and influence of media of the West. Reminding people who had nothing to do with it that it was the worst thing ever in the history of mankind. Which it objectively is not. I tire of hearing about it at all. In the bloodiest war to ever touch to the European continent gay ass Jews did not suffer more than anyone else did. Some ~20M Red Army soldiers and Soviet civilians died during the war from bullet, bomb, and famine. But they have to take a backseat to Jews for some inexplicable reason.

Oh wait it isn't that inexplicable. The treatment of this old cunt daring to step outside the bounds of the official narrative is all you need to know. I am so very glad that it is falling out of living memory and the younger generations don't remotely give a shit. Let the Jews try to make a mountain out of another molehill with October 7th.

My favorite part will always be that most Western people, especially in the USA, fully believe that Americans liberated Auschwitz and all of the death camps. As the Red Army is not really mentioned in our K12 system at all.

 

[Bloom Worm Cross Field]

In the bloodiest war to ever touch to the European continent gay ass Jews did not suffer more than anyone else did. Some ~20M Red Army soldiers and Soviet civilians died during the war from bullet, bomb, and famine. But they have to take a backseat to Jews for some inexplicable reason.

The reason is because the despite being a smaller number of total casualties, the Jewish ethnic group as a whole was in danger of being wiped out. The survival and continuity of an ethnic group has an importance that is not captured by total death numbers.

Do not ruminate any further about this fact or try to apply this principle to the current state of Europe today.

 

[TJT]

The reason is because the despite being a smaller number of total casualties, the Jewish ethnic group as a whole was in danger of being wiped out. The survival and continuity of an ethnic group has an importance that is not captured by total death numbers.

Do not ruminate any further about this fact or try to apply this principle to the current state of Europe today.

Yes, despite the existing Jew diaspora they were in danger of being wiped out.

You're a clown.

 

[Bloom Worm Cross Field]

You're a clown.

If you'd read the second line I wrote you should have realised the post was tongue in cheek.

 

[Marvin]

They have forced it into every Western education system.

Really? I'm from Maryland, an incredibly jew heavy and blue state, and I graduated with a high school diploma without any history class mentioning the Holocaust as part of its curriculum. I learned far more about injuns than jews in school.

Are you American or European?

My favorite part will always be that most Western people, especially in the USA, fully believe that Americans liberated Auschwitz and all of the death camps.

If the euros are too shy, that's their fault. I have no problem with our culture supplying weirdos like Quentin Tarantino with enough feet and cocaine to poop out entertaining propaganda.

As the Red Army is not really mentioned in our K12 system at all.

The Russians are a bunch of trailer park rapists. The brown Russians too. Fuck em.

 

[Wuornos]

Burial pits are not proof that the Jews were gassed. It's only proof that some Jews died. Hardly surprising given the Allied barricades and the carpet bombing of German infrastructure in order to bring about disease and famine.

A younger generation know the Holocaust narrative is bullshit. That's why Jews are now pushing Oct 7th as the new Holocaust. Unfortunately for them though, most people think they brought it on themselves due to their mistreatment of the Palestinians.

It is satisfying seeing the golems the kikes created to attack White people turning on their masters.

 

[The Last Stand]

and I graduated with a high school diploma without any history class mentioning the Holocaust as part of its curriculum. I learned far more about injuns than jews in school.

You know, it's funny. When I went to high school, the Holocaust was merely a footnote followed by a documentary. Take that what you will. That was a few years ago.

 

[Marvin]

A younger generation know the Holocaust narrative is bullshit.

Not really. Have you talked with young people? A fraction of them can't define woman. The rest of them are pretty sane and just respectably quiet.

It is satisfying seeing the golems the kikes created

Well the kikes and something like 40-45% of gentiles.

 

[Snekposter]

Sure is funny how downright rabbinical Holocaust deniers get when it comes to discussing evidence of that event.

 

[Jacques1194]

I don't care what they say, I want proof. They didn't do the actual research so their claims are bunk.

Bro, you're revealing that you aren't a "Seeker of truth" if every fucking response to what historians and people who researched the holocaust is "I don't care what they say!" when they show proof. Admit that you deny the holocaust because you want National Socialism to be popular again. The fact that you think all jews are liars and responded before by claiming they all suck baby dick means you dont care about truth and just hate jews

It was estimated that there were a minimum of forty-nine people in the pit."

Where's the other 899,950 people? I thought we were doing genocide

Do you fucking think the allies could have possibly taken pictures of all the 6 million bodies? By your dumbass logic Mao's Great Leap Forward didn't kill 64 million people because there were no photos of the 64 million bodies. Hell, the fact that your response before with an actual photo of bodies was "Where's the proof that they were jews?" Either that or I've seen the argument that those were german women and children's bodies without proof. Proves that even if the allies took photos of all 6 million bodies you'll still say "Where is the proof"?

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

Burial pits are not proof that the Jews were gassed. It's only proof that some Jews died.

The question was "were there mass graves" and the proof I brought showed there were.

Hardly surprising given the Allied barricades and the carpet bombing of German infrastructure in order to bring about disease and famine.

Disease and famine causes those sorts of traumas on corpses?

So much so that 80 years later faggots on the internet get butthurt at the very idea that the Second World War was in fact not solely about exterminating Jews and failing at it.

meanwhile wignats cry when I point out that the Allies did very little to stop the holocaust and that the rescue of the Jews was more of a side effect of defeating the Germans than an actual objective. Which one is it?

 

[John.Doe]

"Do you have forensic evidence?"

>Researchers find human remains in a former death camp

"So during the war Wizard Hitler using his psychic mind control powers to order the complete extermination of the Jews by using post-hypnotic suggestions coded into various euphemisms. The Nazis were so tricky to never actually issue orders for this genocide unlike literally everything else, so tricky and evil."
"What?"
"This led to the rounding up of all Jews (except all the survivors) and their transport to elaborate death camps with cinemas and dentist offices and swimming pools where the Jews imprisoned for many years until they were genocided with roller coasters, trained bears/eagles, masturbation machines, electric floors, gas chambers, gas vans, and life sized chess games run by evil Nazi officers. Except for the Jews that held their breath or walked backwards to trick the stupid guards. Then all the evidence was destroyed with Evil Nazi Magic."
".....wait, they built death theme parks during a war? I'm sorry, I thought you had forensic evidence?"
"Sure, here is a study where they found a pit an did forensic analysis, ahem "It was estimated that there were a minimum of forty-nine people in the pit." There you are!"
"Well, okay, but I thought you said millions were killed there? Thats only 49 bodies, while its shitty to just throw bodies in a pit 49 deaths at a prison camp in wartime in that period doesn't seem too abnormal."
"Oh but there is more! "Thanks to the trauma analysis results, we may infer that the victims were brutally beaten a....some of the victims were likely killed by forcibly having their heads placed on a wooden block or a stone and hitting them with a tool such as a mallet. Others were hit on the top of their heads with a bat or a plank or a similar object....Some were shot in the back of their head and others were cut through the brain stem or beheaded." See, they did a trauma analysis!"
"Okay, but these causes of death sound kind of like wartime camp executions or extrajudicial beatings by camp guards, again, super shitty but I don't see anything about poison gassing, electrocution or bear maulings so how does this line up with the 'industrial genocide machine' or 'assembly line of DEATH' narrative?"
"Hold on, there is more analysis! "The variety in the manner of death we observed can suggest that there were multiple assailants during the killing, and possibly the murders took place in various locations." There you go, theres the proof!"
"That.....that doesn't help your case? If they were all gassed together, why the variety with beatings, shootings, and cutting? No gassing at all. And even if they decided to beat them to death, why do it ad hoc at multiple locations? That doesn't seem to square with a planned, industrial grade genocide that is expected to kill millions at this one site."
"Typical, you're just another Muslim Neo-Nazi. I knew it."
"????"
"The question was "were there mass graves" and the proof I brought showed there were."
".....okay, where is the rest of the bodies? You've got about 5 million, 9 hundred thousand, 9 hundred and fifty left to go."

Bro, you're revealing that you aren't a "Seeker of truth" if every fucking response to what historians and people who researched the holocaust is "I don't care what they say!" when they show proof.

The issue is, and perhaps he hasn't expressed this well, is that throughout Europe it is legally impossible to present any research that doesn't support the Holocaust theory. It is not only against the law, but tremendous pressure from interested parties that continue to profit monetarily, culturally, and diplomatically would oppose it. For example, there is a well researched and well supported scientific process to investigating genocides and the sites of mass graves from plague, sacrifice, or war. Its called forensic anthropology, and if ever applied to the question at hand would reveal a lot - but it can't be used in Europe to investigate these claims because 1) The conclusions may be illegal and 2) Rabbinical groups claim it would be a desecration to do any research. They start from the conclusion (Jewish remains are here) and use that to justify outlawing both research and conclusions from that research.

You have to admit, it seems kind of suspect that there is so much government and NGO pressure to avoid revealing scientifically what actually happened. Instead, they start from a conclusion and work backwards from there to justify everything.

In this case the conclusion is the starting point (a Holocaust of gassing and incineration) and every scrap of evidence or logical question is forced to bend and twist back to that; a memo about some Hauptmann's boot polish purchases is held up as proof there was Jew-ash everywhere, a photo of two men holding a woman is a 'prisoner being thrown into a crematorium' despite there being nothing else but trees and a fence in the photo, a note from 1985 based on sketched copies of a purported patent which concludes 'there is no way to know if this was ever built or worked' is touted as proof positive that magic super crematoriums existed - all of this is twisted around because the people presenting it as such do not want to go where the evidence leads, only adapt or twist everything to fit their already decided conclusion.

 

[The Lawgiver]

1. Anti-Free Speech laws are heresy. Fuck em.
2.

"Lies"
View attachment 6667317
View attachment 6667347
View attachment 6667349
View attachment 6667350
View attachment 6667355
View attachment 6667373
View attachment 6667452
View attachment 6667453
View attachment 6667455

I'm pretty sure the lies being talked about in the article are the denial of the soviet warcrime shit. ww2 was really fucked up in ways far beyond merely "the jews got gassed" Germany going after her for not liking shit being forbidden from being questioned though is a very classic stereotypical germany move.
EDIT: shit that was several days ago, someone probably already pointed that out by now.

 

[Bonesjones]

Sure is funny how downright rabbinical Holocaust deniers get when it comes to discussing evidence of that event.

"Don't you think jews are terrible, if so why are you acting terrible like us" isn't an own, it's a self inflicted gunshot that even jews can't stand jews.

Bro, you're revealing that you aren't a "Seeker of truth" if every fucking response to what historians and people who researched the holocaust is "I don't care what they say!" when they show proof.

I noticed you still haven't shown one gassed jew and are now crying because you cant.

Admit that you deny the holocaust because you want National Socialism to be popular again

Look at your emotional outburst because you hate white people

The fact that you think all jews are liars and responded before by claiming they all suck baby dick means you dont care about truth and just hate jews

I know all jews are liars, just like how I know all jews love pedophilia. Shabbat 133a 18, it's right there in your baby dick sucking manual.

Do you fucking think the allies could have possibly taken pictures of all the 6 million bodies?

No, but they could have photographed just one. Unfortunately they didn't.

. Hell, the fact that your response before with an actual photo of bodies was "Where's the proof that they were jews?"

That was someone else but good job not knowing what you are talking about.

Either that or I've seen the argument that those were german women and children's bodies without proof.

Yeah you have to actually prove the photographs are what they say they are. Almost like propaganda is about changing the context around events to push your agenda.

Proves that even if the allies took photos of all 6 million bodies you'll still say "Where is the proof"?

Except they didn't so we don't need to speculate.

The question was "were there mass graves" and the proof I brought showed there were.

If only they had photographic technology to show this mass grave they dug up. Why didn't you post those?

Disease and famine causes those sorts of traumas on corpses?

Labor camp uprisings sure do, and there were a lot of those.

meanwhile wignats cry when I point out that the Allies did very little to stop the holocaust and that the rescue of the Jews was more of a side effect of defeating the Germans than an actual objective. Which one is it?

Why would we cry? No one cares about jews except jews. You are so pathetic you had to invent your own genocide, people just want you away from them but you can't help but crawl through the walls like rats.

Also why would the allies fight a war to stop something that didnt happen? It's just an admittance that everyone at the time knew it was fake even though every jew at the time was pushing how real it was.