Artcow SamanthaPrater / EruzaArto / DefyingGravityAgain / Emily Nicole Cassidy / Willowtheway / Uniloax - Special Ed Art Thief and "Big Bonned" Attention Whore; Perpetual Liar; Cucumber Princess; Negligent Animal Abuser; Twice Investigated for Murder

https://www.tumblr.com/superbiaamoris/768063409510137856/photo-referencing-wikipedia?source=share
https://www.tumblr.com/superbiaamor...efinition-what-l-does-is-in-fact?source=share
I wrote two journals on why Lamby is not refrencing, pose blocking but is infact tracing, WITH proof against your words, my art may be shit but it's original and not made from Stock Photos line by line. "Pose blocking" is not what Lamby is doing, as that is different. I do not have a "Hate Boner." and I am glad to be a cunt when people who are Gaslit to believe another thing exists when it doesn't. sorry not sorry but y'all are trolling the wrong person, have been severely brainwashed and I hope my proof helps you realize that .

I don't feel like re posting it all here.
 

All I want from L is for them to credit their Stock Photos, Tell their Client's they use references, and to stop claiming Original art when they aren't Original. To do a speed DRAW not a speed paint, ( Which is coloring, not sketching) WITH OBS which shows the program.​

It doesn't even need to be live. it just needs to be recorded with OBS, so the program shows. Even if you don't do that, how hard is it to credit the stock you use or inform your clients that you use stock -photo's and trace over them? why is that such a bad thing to ask L to do? That's ALL I am asking for them to do.​

Simple. there's no harm in actually alerting your client's that you trace over Photo-Stock. L doesn't do their own original poses. they use Stock Photo's, which nothing wrong with that but how ever, ORIGINAL does mean from THE MIND not a pre-made image.​

Just credit your sources, and explain to your client's that you use pre-made resources. I'm not angry at L, even though they did all this to me. I just want them to admit to this publicly and to be done with me. Why is it so hard to admit that you use pre-made resources? If Stock Photo's & Reference's weren't so bad to use, why hide the fact you use them? Just be honest to your clientele, Reddit, etc. Say "I use Pre-made resources to help me draw. " pretty much.​

I mean no harm to L nor do I wish them any harm. I JUST want them to own up to their use of pre-made material.​

 
Emily is an overachiever.
T1.JPG
Numpty Angwy.
T3.jpg
Child behaves like a child that was told "No".
T4.JPG
"Block me and move on" says someone who has a well established history of block evading, ban evading, and not moving on.
T2.jpg
I can almost hear that door on the padded room closing.

"I DEMAND THAT LAMBY DO AS I COMMAND".
T5.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pedophobe
1732509484337.png
1732509500307.png

Also Lamby's drawing WAS in fact referenced and NOT original. it was a commission for a CLIENT off Secondlife. they based it off of the image seen here, so no, Lamby did NOT come up with this pose, the original creator of the Avatar did. :| if y'all wanna get pissy and call me an art thief, the pose is COMMON. it is NOT Lamby's original idea. the body on the secondlife image is flipped, but generally the same, the legs are a bit different but the rest of it is COPIED OFF THE SECONDLIFE PHOTO. it is NOT original. the original belongs to the secondlife creator of the outfit, body, hair, etc.
 
Also Lamby's drawing WAS in fact referenced and NOT original. it was a commission for a CLIENT off Secondlife. they based it off of the image seen here, so no, Lamby did NOT come up with this pose, the original creator of the Avatar did. :| if y'all wanna get pissy and call me an art thief, the pose is COMMON. it is NOT Lamby's original idea. the body on the secondlife image is flipped, but generally the same, the legs are a bit different but the rest of it is COPIED OFF THE SECONDLIFE PHOTO. it is NOT original. the original belongs to the secondlife creator of the outfit, body, hair, etc.
You're really, really stupid.
 
View attachment 6683111View attachment 6683113
Also Lamby's drawing WAS in fact referenced and NOT original. it was a commission for a CLIENT off Secondlife. they based it off of the image seen here, so no, Lamby did NOT come up with this pose, the original creator of the Avatar did. :| if y'all wanna get pissy and call me an art thief, the pose is COMMON. it is NOT Lamby's original idea. the body on the secondlife image is flipped, but generally the same, the legs are a bit different but the rest of it is COPIED OFF THE SECONDLIFE PHOTO. it is NOT original. the original belongs to the secondlife creator of the outfit, body, hair, etc.
The commission was to Lamby, was it not? Or am I mistaken in that recollection and assuming she just proved that? IE, the player of the character commissioned Lamby to draw their character.
 
All I want Lamby to be is, HONEST with their clientel. they make money , they should be open about their resource use. that's not harming Lamby, that's just asking them to be honest about using pre-made sources.
You should know by now that you will never make Lamby do anything for you beyond getting a restraining order.
As you like to say "Jealousy is a mean beast" and that is all you have. In case it wasn't obvious already, nobody agrees with you. You're getting noticed by strangers from Tumblr and they know you're insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pedophobe

All I want from L is for them to credit their Stock Photos, Tell their Client's they use references, and to stop claiming Original art when they aren't Original. To do a speed DRAW not a speed paint, ( Which is coloring, not sketching) WITH OBS which shows the program.​

It doesn't even need to be live. it just needs to be recorded with OBS, so the program shows. Even if you don't do that, how hard is it to credit the stock you use or inform your clients that you use stock -photo's and trace over them? why is that such a bad thing to ask L to do? That's ALL I am asking for them to do.​

Simple. there's no harm in actually alerting your client's that you trace over Photo-Stock. L doesn't do their own original poses. they use Stock Photo's, which nothing wrong with that but how ever, ORIGINAL does mean from THE MIND not a pre-made image.​

Just credit your sources, and explain to your client's that you use pre-made resources. I'm not angry at L, even though they did all this to me. I just want them to admit to this publicly and to be done with me. Why is it so hard to admit that you use pre-made resources? If Stock Photo's & Reference's weren't so bad to use, why hide the fact you use them? Just be honest to your clientele, Reddit, etc. Say "I use Pre-made resources to help me draw. " pretty much.​

I mean no harm to L nor do I wish them any harm. I JUST want them to own up to their use of pre-made material.​

Uh oh! Now we're at bold and spicy levels of anger!
View attachment 6683111View attachment 6683113
Also Lamby's drawing WAS in fact referenced and NOT original. it was a commission for a CLIENT off Secondlife. they based it off of the image seen here, so no, Lamby did NOT come up with this pose, the original creator of the Avatar did. :| if y'all wanna get pissy and call me an art thief, the pose is COMMON. it is NOT Lamby's original idea. the body on the secondlife image is flipped, but generally the same, the legs are a bit different but the rest of it is COPIED OFF THE SECONDLIFE PHOTO. it is NOT original. the original belongs to the secondlife creator of the outfit, body, hair, etc.
Finally, the smoking gun. Emily admits that Lamby used this image as a reference. A reference, not a traced image. So since we have the proof right in front of our eyes that Lamby referenced and did not trace, we know that Emily is the liar. Emily is the tracer. Emily is the thief. Congratulations, you played yourself.
All I want Lamby to be is, HONEST with their clientel. they make money , they should be open about their resource use. that's not harming Lamby, that's just asking them to be honest about using pre-made sources.
Yeah, Lamby! You should be honest and up front with your client that you took the image that they wanted you to draw and you drew it. Lol

I know Emily is a retard, hence why she's called downy Emmy, but this is another level of stupidity right here.
 
I want to apologize to @SamanthaPrater for saying her scribbles were "ugly". I know it really hurts her little feelers and I'm ever so sorry. I will stop saying "ugly" and instead use much better words.

Emily's art is hideous, revolting, juvenile, imbecilic, forgery, an abomination, an aberration, a crime against God, vomit inducing, inane, compost, feculent, childish, repulsive, God awful, bland, uninspired, lame, F-tier, retarded, sickening, demon possessed, lousy, crusty, disgusting, and just plain blech.

Please forgive me, cucumber princess.
 
Emily again pulls the "Art used to be fun" speech.
She really loves the power fantasy where she's the head of the art community and teaches others how to get good at art. And she bases this entirely on her age.
Reality check: its easy to sit on your ass and grow old while doing nothing worthwhile with yourself. Now look at all the other people posting art, well defined anatomy and posing along with consideration to color and lighting. Does Emily think these people are concerned with their age and how it factors into an imaginary power hierarchy?
She keeps trying to say she's a newcomer, a student of the arts, a pupil. By her own admission, she's been scribbling nonsense since she was 18. That's 16 years Emily. Thought I'd save you the trouble of struggling with numbers.

And now her newest delusion. she's thinking about 13 year old children. They exist in your sick age play sessions Emily. Take your meds and go back to the Meadows where you belong.
 
Back