State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
Maggie Kluver lied, she said she would get the brief in before the 25th, now the 25th is halfway over in Minnesota and its still not up on MCRO.

I am really looking forward to reading what is hopefully a decently competent probably cause challenge of the search warrant, just to put it into contrast with Nick's garbage.

I also wonder if the delay with this brief stems from Nick trying to influence what they argue.

Nah, I'd bet money that Kandi-You're-High county is just slow to get it into MCRO. Pretty sure we saw this with one of Racket's filings too, everyone thought maybe he missed the deadline or got some kind of preliminary agreement on a plea, but it just took another day-ish for it to go up in the database
 
Maggie Kluver lied, she said she would get the brief in before the 25th, now the 25th is halfway over in Minnesota and its still not up on MCRO.
She offered to try to get it in earlier but the court said 25th is fine. Court also said prosecution has until 12/9 to reply. I think it would almost be malpractice to give the opponent extra time. When the court set 12/9 as the hard reply date and not "10 days after defense filing" they guaranteed that the defense would not file before 11/25. The defense isn't going to give their time to the prosecution which is what would have happened if defense filed early. It wouldn't have sped up the process because the judge hard set dates of reply and under advisement.

I don't expect them to file until evening. It may not show up until tomorrow.

Also, for Nick, this judge gave himself 30 days for his under advisement ruling but issued it early which started the calendar for settlement conference. Nice of the judge to grant extra time to attorneys and then make up for it with his quick ruling.
 
Perhaps this was already asked pages ago and I missed it, but could the State use the potential of additional charges related to the computer tampering/hacking as leverage for a plea agreement in regards to the drug case? And if they did, would that ever be something that would become public so we would know about it, or would it be a verbal agreement between Nick's lawyer and the State prosecutor?
 
Perhaps this was already asked pages ago and I missed it, but could the State use the potential of additional charges related to the computer tampering/hacking as leverage for a plea agreement in regards to the drug case? And if they did, would that ever be something that would become public so we would know about it, or would it be a verbal agreement between Nick's lawyer and the State prosecutor?
The hearing tomorrow is public, so unless they discuss stuff at a sidebar it will be part of the transcript.
They could of course mention it, but since that crime has a victim in the form of Aaron and his family, being harassed for weeks by Melton and Nick, I find it unlikely they would drop that just to get Nick to plead out.

More likely that if that issue rises to the point of charges being filed it would be in an entirely separate case.
 
The hearing tomorrow is public, so unless they discuss stuff at a sidebar it will be part of the transcript.
They could of course mention it, but since that crime has a victim in the form of Aaron and his family, being harassed for weeks by Melton and Nick, I find it unlikely they would drop that just to get Nick to plead out.

More likely that if that issue rises to the point of charges being filed it would be in an entirely separate case.
The judge has 19 matters before the court tomorrow. 30 minutes is for Rekieta conference. I think it will be very quick. An Aaron rathole is unlikely. I don't think the court would entertain anything that hasn't already been put to paper. If the Aaron thing is an issue, I think he'll ask for briefs and move on.
 
Perhaps this was already asked pages ago and I missed it, but could the State use the potential of additional charges related to the computer tampering/hacking as leverage for a plea agreement in regards to the drug case? And if they did, would that ever be something that would become public so we would know about it, or would it be a verbal agreement between Nick's lawyer and the State prosecutor?
Depends on how and where it could be done, but yes. The prosecution can threaten additional charges (or depending how you look at it offer NOT to press additional charges) based on the resolution of this case. They have extremely broad discretion. They can offer to relinquish the pressing of additional charges for any crimes they already know about or, incredibly unwisely, those they even don't know about yet.

Generally, the legal system is very happy with any resolution that gets rid of all pending matters.

Perhaps you should be concerned with the sheer power prosecutors have in our system to do things like threaten to bring additional charges if you don't make some unfavorable plea deal in a currently pending case (and you should be), but that's entirely within their power.
 
Predictions about the outcome of the settlement hearing? I think Nick will double down. Does anyone think he'll take the deal?
I think he's too much of a narcissist to do the smart thing. I think he'll take it all the way, lose, and spend the next decade making appeal after appeal long after his sentence is completed, just so he can win against the internet.

Hopefully Kayla will (and her family if they're whispering into her ear will encourage her to) be smarter and plea out. Women almost always get more lenient sentences and she's likely to get probation and no time and since I don't think she gives a fuck about owning guns, its really no harm to her to do so.
 
Predictions about the outcome of the settlement hearing? I think Nick will double down. Does anyone think he'll take the deal?

I think it depends on the deal, but I err towards plea, so he can keep things like the bodycam footage from public record. With things like that hidden, he can spread whatever narrative he wants, just like after the CHPS case was sealed.

I think he'll plea as along as he can get the child endangerment charge dropped, as that's his last hope for crowing he's not a bad parent.

I want him to go to trial though.
 
Does anyone think he'll take the deal?
I do.
I do not think he can sustain the economic or reputational damage that a court battle would entail.
Now prove me wrong, Nick.

eta: I think he believes that he can regain most of his admirers and salvage a social media career. He is delusional about many things.
 
I think it depends on the deal, but I err towards plea, so he can keep things like the bodycam footage from public record. With things like that hidden, he can spread whatever narrative he wants, just like after the CHPS case was sealed.

I think he'll plea as along as he can get the child endangerment charge dropped, as that's his last hope for crowing he's not a bad parent.
I don't think him taking a plea stops the body cam from being released. I think it frees it up, because at that point the case will be closed. But maybe Minnesota has rules I'm unfamiliar with.
 
I predict Nick will refuse to plead guilty. If he’s put in that position, he’ll go to trial. Also predicting he’ll be hit with charges on the computer/ witnesses intimidation stuff very soon. It won’t just be let go.

Not saying it will be added to the current criminal case, but that he’ll have new charges before too long. It could be rolled into one or kept separate. Betting on things getting worse due to decisions tomorrow made by Nick.

It’s could go either way in many people’s minds, as most people would plead, so that speaks to their common sense. Nick is an exceptional individual (in the full meaning of that term on this forum specifically) so he could easily fag out & take it to a cope-trial. Being as it seems like a 50/50 shot either way, I decided to bet against better human judgement here & bet on Nicks disorder to shine through. It’s Nick the cuck of Minnesota & this is his time.
 
Predictions about the outcome of the settlement hearing? I think Nick will double down. Does anyone think he'll take the deal?
hmm if you asked me a month ago I'd say he was gonna fight it but the recent self pity stuff on locals makes me lean towards him pleaing out, laying low for a bit, then saying its all bs but he had to do it cause the gubmint corrupt or some stuff. I think he's gonna fight this in the court of public opinion rather than the us justice system.

of course it'd be funnier if he fights it.
 
Nah, I'd bet money that Kandi-You're-High county is just slow to get it into MCRO. Pretty sure we saw this with one of Racket's filings too, everyone thought maybe he missed the deadline or got some kind of preliminary agreement on a plea, but it just took another day-ish for it to go up in the database
It's thanksgiving week. Half the clerks are on vacation and the ones that are there aren't exactly working
 
of course it'd be funnier if he fights it.
And kneeling and groveling to the state would be hilarious, too, especially if he is forced to confess to guilt in front of a judge, and his pleading and begging gets revealed to the public. He will be revealed as a loser, who admits he's guilty, after screaming and slurring everyone who said he was guilty of exactly the things he's FORCED to get down on his knees and admit he's guilty of.

What an absolute faggot if he pleads guilty. He will admit all his defiance and bullshit was just the pathetic attempts of a guilty loser to squirm pathetically out of what he now admits he's guilty of.

Would a man do that?

Not really.

A worm might.

Nick should FIGHT TO THE DEATH AGAINST THE DEEP STATE!

Tell me I'm wrong.
 
Accept the plea after side bar to include computer tampering & ratting out ralph.
Salt would be if they require drug rehab if he take the plea deal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
Predictions about the outcome of the settlement hearing? I think Nick will double down. Does anyone think he'll take the deal?
No way Nick gets a better deal now than he was offered previously. He slurred on Meltonfiles shitty show that he was offered a deal, but it wasn't good enough. Somehow he thought he could bargain a better deal.

He has no leverage (quite the contrary- especially if Stearns County has talked to Kandiyohi). Nick is too dumb and prideful to take a plea, so he's going full on to trial.
 
Back