State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Is this true? Because if so, I'm gonna be eating fucking well for several months as this retard is slammed by the prosecutor.

It's from Nick's own mouth when he called in to meltonfile's show, drink as a skunk. But it's Nick, so it may not be true.

 

[AnOminous]

He has no leverage (quite the contrary- especially if Stearns County has talked to Kandiyohi). Nick is too dumb and prideful to take a plea, so he's going full on to trial.

I'm not sure whether you're overestimating his intelligence or underestimating his cowardice.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

I'm not sure whether you're overestimating his intelligence or underestimating his cowardice.

Probably the latter, but time will tell tomorrow.

 

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

I think he will go all the way because he thinks he will be able to force the state to hide the bodycam footage from the public due to the "online nerd stalker child" threat. He will think he can force the footage that does become public to be extremely narrow in scope so that he can shape the narrative, all the other segments of footage entered into evidence he will try and hide from public view due to children and such. I assume that if you are physically present in the courtroom that you will see it but otherwise it wouldn't be able to be shown on the Internet.

He won't take a plea because he would have to admit he committed crimes and I don't think he can do that. Though with his recent language of kinda-admitting some things like saying "abuse of drugs was happening but it wasn't addiction" he might believe that even with a guilty plea he can still shape the narrative by saying "drugs should be legal though so fuck the state."

 

[Bogliacci]

I can see nick groveling for a plea deal that seals the case and all evidence, which I'm not sure is possible or not.

 

[newuser131]

will the plea hearing be over zoom?

 

[Empress Nympho]

will the plea hearing be over zoom?

No.

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

I can see nick groveling for a plea deal that seals the case and all evidence, which I'm not sure is possible or not.

Maybe that's what he meant when he said the plea deal wasn't good enough

 

[Watching Rekieta]

And if Kayla's filing doesn't show up this morning, I wonder if they both reached a plea agreement.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Predictions about the outcome of the settlement hearing? I think Nick will double down. Does anyone think he'll take the deal?

Nick is going to plea out.

Not because of money or pride, but because it didn't magically motivate a hardcore base to circle wagons around him like he planned.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

The filing is online.

pdf attached, here are the pages as png.

 

[Kosher Dill]

Is it too late to place my bet? I'm betting Nick tries to go for whatever an Alford plea is called in Minnesota, and gets shot down.

 

[Canard]

Sheet rock? "Nick is an actor" "We all know we are not to believe what we see and hear on the internet"

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

"Nicholas Rekieta is an internet personality, and in the single video, the only credible evidence contained in the Application for Search Warrant, Nicholas Rekieta was engaged in an internet performance. It is a show for “likes” and “hits”. The more “likes”, comments, and “hits” the performance generates, the more income is generated. He is an actor. We all know we are not to believe what we see and hear on the internet."

"Your honor, you cannot believe things you see on the internet!"

And here I thought Kayla's lawyer was less of a retard.

 

[Gulls on Film]

Ah the old "I was just working on sheet rock" defense.

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

Very bold accusation, I'm sure they have evidence of said Aaron Imholte swatting. Lets see how this one plays out.

 

[Canard]

View attachment 6688723
Very bold accusation. Lets see how that plays out.

Can this statement be considered libellous? If Aaron had money could he go after Kayla and his lawyer for this?

 

[Yandex Captcha Solver]

Can this statement be considered libellous? If Aaron had money could he go after Kayla and his lawyer for this?

Statements inside court can't be considered defamatory or libel from my understanding. But I hope the judge reems them a new one demanding information about this. It's a very bold accusation. If your going to spout bullshit, you better have a lick of evidence supporting it.

 

[not william stenchever]

The drywall manufacturer was in on the conspiracy too. They put cocaine in the drywall!

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Can this statement be considered libellous? If Aaron had money could he go after Kayla and his lawyer for this?

Very unlikely.

Statements inside court can't be considered defamatory or libel from my understanding.

They can in certain circumstances. See:

Only if it's relevant to the case at hand. Collins v. Red Roof Inns, 211 W. Va. 458, 566 S.E.2d 595 (W. Va. 2002) But, generally said, this is not a prospective vector of attack.

For something more related to Minnesota, see Mahoney v. Newgard, 729 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 2007) from the Minnesota Supreme Court, or Fredin v. Kreil, Case No. 20-cv-01929 (SRN/HB) (D. Minn. Dec. 18, 2020) from a federal court