Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter KO 864
  • Start date Start date

Which is Better

  • Chicken Little

    Votes: 383 26.0%

  • Hunchback 2

    Votes: 53 3.6%

  • A slow death

    Votes: 1,037 70.4%
  • Total voters
    1,473
Bread Fetishist said:
Okay, now you're just talking crazy
Click to expand...
Frozen at least makes sense because at that point in time it was legitimately the biggest animated film of all time but even its sequel came out like several years after the original.

Moana within a year of us finding out about this sequel already has a remake of itself and a third film planned.

Feels a lot more oversaturated in a shorter amount of time IMO.

Encanto is probably about to suffer the same fate
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: The-Mad-Asshatter, Mao Hao Hao, Reckless Starfish and 4 others
I feel like tis year will define the next 10 years of disney.
It's the first year in the 2020's where they made a profit.
What were the big hits?
Inside Out 2 at $1.7 billion (a sequel), Deadpool 3 at $1.3 billion (a crossover) and Alien: Romulus at $350 million ( a reboot).
That's how Disney will do things for the next few years: sequels, crossovers and reboots.

I'm just waiting for the rally stupid shit to start happening like X- Men vs Predator.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Pina Colada, The-Mad-Asshatter, Mao Hao Hao and 10 others
Coo Coo Bird said:
The Tarzan rights are complicated. The Burroughs estate still has rights to it, ridiculously enough.
Click to expand...
Love Tarzan. The one White icon the semites can never nigger up - because they wouldn't dare show a black as a monkey.
Idiotron said:
I feel like tis year will define the next 10 years of disney.
It's the first year in the 2020's where they made a profit.
What were the big hits?
Inside Out 2 at $1.7 billion (a sequel), Deadpool 3 at $1.3 billion (a crossover) and Alien: Romulus at $350 million ( a reboot).
That's how Disney will do things for the next few years: sequels, crossovers and reboots.
Click to expand...
They'll try to devour the east like Netfux/Amazog are doing. Disney already owns some animu, even Ghibli licenses unfortunately. And the eastern agenda 2040 is about prepping the field to nigger the place ala the kosher west. You think all the nogs popping up in nintendo games and manga recently is a coincidence? You think "keep foreigners out" Abe getting whacked was a random incident? You think Asscreed Shadows shoving niggers into Sengoku Japan was just innocent baizuo shit? People fled shitty co-opted western monopolies like Disney for greener pastures, and the eastern pastures will be salted in the exact same way by the exact same Blackrock-types. Blackrock is already buying out Japanese media publishers in order to get their "thumbs in the plum".
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: ellroy, Starscream's Loyalty, Lil Yappy and 6 others
Scarlett Johansson said:
Yoooo i still can't get over the boy in this picture. He is Bobby Driscoll. He was a child star and best known as the voice of Peter Pan. Although he does indeed look like a cartoon rat irl (or like someone with cataracts tried to make James Dean in The Sims) his story is ultimately a tragic one. He was abusive to his wife and arrested numerous times. Eventually he found his way into the Warhol gang. Got into drugs and drinking. His corpse was found in an abandoned NYC home by two kids who mistook it for...I believe either a scarecrow or something. He was unrecognizable and past rigor mortis. He was buried in an unmarked grave and to this day his body was never found. In a way he is technically the first Disney kid to have a self destructive career.
Click to expand...

Sorry wait. Wait wait wait wait...........
Is this actually real can anyone confirm? If real its fucking tasteless and shitty....

Here's a documentary on him. I find particularly poignant what Connie Stevens says at the end, about how fans sustain you.
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: The Decimator, Mao Hao Hao, He's Ronald McDonald and 2 others
  • Agree
Reactions: Mao Hao Hao, Silence of the Troons, Vyse Inglebard and 1 other person
neverendingmidi said:
Too many live action Tarzan movies out there already.
Click to expand...
Trilby said:
Agree, going back a century ago.
Click to expand...
The fact that there's so many of them speaks to the timelessness of Tarzan as a character, I'd say. My two personal favorites are the Disney film and "Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes" from 1984, directed by the same guy who did "Chariots of Fire."

Tangentially, there were efforts to make a movie about Burroughs' other major creation - "John Carter of Mars" - going as far back as the 1940s, long before the Disney movie from 2012. Bob Clampett of "Looney Tunes" fame actually made a proof-of-concept animation reel for a series of "John Carter" theater shorts, but the only Hollywood studio that considered publishing them thought it would be "too weird" for general audiences.

If you're at all interested in the attempts to make a "John Carter" movie - as well as some more justification to shit on Disney's clueless management in their filmmaking divisions - John Carter and the Gods of Hollywood by Michael D. Sellers is a pretty solid book that covers the literal one-hundred years of publishing deals, producer meetings, and filmmaking between the first book's publication (1912) and the film finally being released (2012), and the disasters that ensued.

Sorry if this got a bit too tangential. I'm a fan of the "John Carter" books and comics, and I liked the 2012 film in spite of its flaws. It's a good adventure movie buried under a lot of mismanagement. For what it's worth, the Burroughs estate also still owns the "John Carter" IP, so maybe it's good that they actually have the option to turn Disney down.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: The-Mad-Asshatter, Starscream's Loyalty, Mao Hao Hao and 10 others
HarpersFerryWest said:
The fact that there's so many of them speaks to the timelessness of Tarzan as a character, I'd say. My two personal favorites are the Disney film and "Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes" from 1984, directed by the same guy who did "Chariots of Fire."

Tangentially, there were efforts to make a movie about Burroughs' other major creation - "John Carter of Mars" - going as far back as the 1940s, long before the Disney movie from 2012. Bob Clampett of "Looney Tunes" fame actually made a proof-of-concept animation reel for a series of "John Carter" theater shorts, but the only Hollywood studio that considered publishing them thought it would be "too weird" for general audiences.

If you're at all interested in the attempts to make a "John Carter" movie - as well as some more justification to shit on Disney's clueless management in their filmmaking divisions - John Carter and the Gods of Hollywood by Michael D. Sellers is a pretty solid book that covers the literal one-hundred years of publishing deals, producer meetings, and filmmaking between the first book's publication (1912) and the film finally being released (2012), and the disasters that ensued.

Sorry if this got a bit too tangential. I'm a fan of the "John Carter" books and comics, and I liked the 2012 film in spite of its flaws. It's a good adventure movie buried under a lot of mismanagement. For what it's worth, the Burroughs estate also still owns the "John Carter" IP, so maybe it's good that they actually have the option to turn Disney down.
Click to expand...
John Carter Of No Specific Planet was a lot less-bad than it could have been.

I was _really_ annoyed with that Princess of Mars with the porn chick, mostly because it could have just kept the "chased into the cave, magic to Barsoom" just change injuns for islams. Instead they had that bullshit about the secret government Mars program or whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mao Hao Hao, HarpersFerryWest and Coo Coo Bird
Doctor of Autism said:
Rescuers Down Under = Literally a film that I don't think anyone would care about, especially being a sequel to another film not really notable.
Click to expand...
Just done a little checking even the furries and furfags barely remember or GAF about both the Rescuers and Rescuers Down Under. The ones who do seem to have some intact self-preservation instincts to not ask for a remake or reboot.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Pina Colada, The-Mad-Asshatter, Mao Hao Hao and 4 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back