State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
My guess is nick took the plea but, reason for dear -feeder name is plea was two fold-1. Agreed to everything prosecution wanted. 2. Child endangerment dropped & body cam suppressed because xyz.
That notice is that plea will be broadcast for closure.(public opinion on issue)
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Neetorino
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/nicholas-robert-rekieta-rekieta-law-nickrekieta.53871/post-19956806
Yes Jim was talking about crosspost in sec.
Answer to Ralph plea.
Screenshot_20241127_195113_Chrome.jpgScreenshot_20241127_195958_Chrome.jpg
 
Last edited:
I just noticed something funny and weird about today’s latest filing in Nick’s case, which is a notice of hearing for the new settlement conference in December.

View attachment 6693586

The notice is attached to the post and screenshotted below:

View attachment 6693590

I noticed something that did not appear on previous hearing notices. Some familiar names appear towards the bottom.

View attachment 6693599

How considerate of the court to keep our Dear Feeder up to date!
All plea deals must be sent to Josh and Hardin to confirm that the deal will be the funniest possible outcome. It's a constitutional requirement.
 
All plea deals must be sent to Josh and Hardin to confirm that the deal will be the funniest possible outcome. It's a constitutional requirement.
The myth of consensual plea deals:
Nick: I consent. Minnesota: I consent.
Didn't you forget to ask someone?
Null: I don't.
 
The guy's name is William Cashman? As in, Bill Cashman? What the fuck? Is there something in the water in Minnesota? First we have, Officer Felt, then Judge SJW, and now we have Bill Cashman.
You forgot CPS Agent Sweeps.
Another win for nominative determinism.
 
Rate me optimistic but my wish for an early Christmas present is that the settlement conference reaches the point where potential witness tampering/hacking gets brought up and the Judge decides "Fuck it, we'll do it live, We're going to trial. Settlement. D E N I E D.

I'd argue the Judge already have enough grounds with the ridiculous defense position of

"They're all liars,
They planted ebidence,
I'm going to waste all your time trying to get the warrant thrown out,
I'm going to publicly and in court filings attempt to besmirch the reputations of Judge Pussyliqour, The CPS workers, The drug lab that did the tests, The church I once attended whilst obviously high,
The police put that cocaine in my daughter's hair.
Everyone's a liar except non practising, not a law channel, stand-up comedian, entertainer, associate of two self confessed peadophiles Nicky "Cuckpope" Rackets"

Fine Mr Rekeita, let's test your legal defense in open court, since you feel so bold as to constantly talk shit on social media.
 
Rate me optimistic but my wish for an early Christmas present is that the settlement conference reaches the point where potential witness tampering/hacking gets brought up and the Judge decides "Fuck it, we'll do it live, We're going to trial. Settlement. D E N I E D.

I'd argue the Judge already have enough grounds with the ridiculous defense position of

"They're all liars,
They planted ebidence,
I'm going to waste all your time trying to get the warrant thrown out,
I'm going to publicly and in court filings attempt to besmirch the reputations of Judge Pussyliqour, The CPS workers, The drug lab that did the tests, The church I once attended whilst obviously high,
The police put that cocaine in my daughter's hair.
Everyone's a liar except non practising, not a law channel, stand-up comedian, entertainer, associate of two self confessed peadophiles Nicky "Cuckpope" Rackets"

Fine Mr Rekeita, let's test your legal defense in open court, since you feel so bold as to constantly talk shit on social media.

I would wager Nick tries the 'But it's CHRISTMAS' tactic where the Spirit of St. Nicholas will possess the judge, and he will grant a continuance into the next year.
 
I would wager Nick tries the 'But it's CHRISTMAS' tactic where the Spirit of St. Nicholas will possess the judge, and he will grant a continuance into the next year.
Possibly or he could just be sick of the sight of this sneering prick and decide that he'd rather deny any settlement, set a trial date and give the state time to look into all these various claims of malfeasance, give the defense time to cobble together something coherent that isn't just some variation of "Everyone but me is lying. Trust me bro" and get this raging gobshite to shut his mouth for five seconds online.

I'd imagine anyone with the legal power to tell a loudmouth faggot like Nick to "Fuck off and come back later with your bullshit arguments, you annoying lying cunt" would take that option once a threshold of tolerance was reached.
 
Last edited:
Happy turkey day. I am lost. Did anything happen at the hearings in late October? Did we get a copy of the trial minutes?
 
  • Late
Reactions: Hungry Fox
Happy turkey day. I am lost. Did anything happen at the hearings in late October? Did we get a copy of the trial minutes?
Alternative 1: go back 10 pages and scroll through. If confused or want more, click to prior quoted comments. Or go back another 10 pages and scroll through.

Alternative 2: go back to page 175 and follow highlights.

Personally I prefer #1 bc highlights just reflect quantity of ratings, but ymmv.
 
Back