Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 71 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 161 40.3%

  • Total voters
    400
Plea deals often include things not directly related to the charges in question. For instance, no drinking or drugs is extremely common even if drinking or drugs, while related to the charges, aren't even a charge.
Yeah, that's a peculiarity of the US justice system I find difficult to wrap my head around unless it's to keep an allied industry profitable.

Likewise non-consorting conditions being imposed where there wasn't a criminal enterprise or domestic violence involved.

The suggestion of a 5 year probation period which includes mandatory testing for that whole period floored me. What corrections system has the resources to accommodate that level of intense supervision for non-violent offenders.

I get your point that whatever they agree to, whether with the court or CPS, becomes effectively the same as consent orders but it seems like a bullshit deal from the outside. I'd also love to know how what Nick was offered compares to what Kayla was offered.

For some reason, I only just noticed that April's charge is for weed.
 
Seems they are back

Even if every allegation about black hookers and ppp in the cuck chair were true it was never gonna matter. Frankly I thought the metokur maschocist and other discord drama might have done them in especially after they pressed DSP on derich but they did the correct thing and just nuked it and moved on. If andy doing songs about him killing his kid wouldn't do them in it almost nothing short of one of their kids testing positive for cocaine would.
 
So is it confirmed Nick pleaded guilty. Kino casino says he did but I can’t find confirmation.
No, it isn't. It's bullshit. Everything indicates whether or not they have a deal it isn't signed and it isn't approved by the judge, or they wouldn't be having another conference.
Likewise non-consorting conditions being imposed where there wasn't a criminal enterprise or domestic violence involved.
They aren't "imposed," though. The court could not do this on its own initiative. You can agree to anything it's legal to agree to as part of a plea deal, though, because you voluntarily accept the condition in return for something. Nick has the right to associate with April. He also has the right to agree not to do so in return for something of value to him.

Short of something obviously illegal, like signing himself into indentured servitude to the prosecutor, nearly anything can be in a plea agreement. It's how prosecutors get conditions they could never or almost never get from an actual court order.
For some reason, I only just noticed that April's charge is for weed.
No, it's cocaine. It's a class of minor drug felony including schedule 1, 2, 3, 4 and NOT A SMALL AMOUNT of marijuana. In her case it's schedule 2, cocaine (small amount). Presumably this is from drug residues. I find this to be a very weak case especially charged as a felony. I suspect it was brought for the purposes of leverage.
 
Last edited:
This is not "verification" of anything
Admittedly, it's not. But it does suggest that BBN didn't make the claim up out of whole cloth, ala Kinochet. Not if other people heard it elsewhere prior.

The underlying claim could still be wrong, of course, but I don't think it's being repeated by BBN maliciously, and with knowledge of falsehood by BBN.

I've not seen anything indicating he was planning to accept a plea deal.. What makes you think he was willing?
Nick sending Melton a 100$ superchat saying "I will have to do something because its best for my family and to show my boys how to be responsible".
Praphrasing because I am zoo lazy to find the actual quote.
There were two superchats which, read together, form a sort of amalgamation of what you just said.

1732648185278.jpeg
Screenshot 2024-11-26 at 1.53.41 PM.png

It should be noted the second one suggests he's looking to end it to preserve his own sanity though. Not for the good of his family. Nick doesn't GAS about his family.

To Nick, the right thing is to reject any plea that requires him to plead guilty to something he thinks he didn't do. That's the example he wants to set for his children. The anathema is not taking the deal, b/c he knows the odds ain't great.
Except you forget the other chat where he says that dragging this out further would drive him insane.

A plea would end all of this in short order (except for satisfying probation, of course). A trial would NOT. It would drag out this farce even longer. It's not hard to see why so many people in this thread thought, based on what he was saying in Melton's chat, that Tuesday would end with a signed plea deal.

Moreover, while I totally get that Nick is an arrogant son of a bitch who can never admit when he's wrong (hence it being an "anathema" for him), it should be noted that him taking a plea would dovetail with his meager professional experience.

Most of Nick's cases, as a defense attorney, have ended with him pleading out his clients where he can't secure a dismissal. Nick has never outright won an acquittal, ever. I'm not sure Nick knows how to get an acquittal.

In Nick's case, obviously, he utterly failed to secure a dismissal, so guess what other tactic he knows to apply here.

EDIT: Typo.
 
Last edited:
It would drag out this farce even longer. It's not hard to see why so many people in this thread thought, based on what he was saying in Melton's chat, that Tuesday would end with a signed plea deal.
I think he actually did go in planning on that but then the deal was a lot worse than he was expecting because in his dumb hubris, he thinks that retarded motion Kayla filed was going to intimidate them somehow.
 
Yeah, that's a peculiarity of the US justice system I find difficult to wrap my head around unless it's to keep an allied industry profitable.
You're on the right track...

The suggestion of a 5 year probation period which includes mandatory testing for that whole period floored me. What corrections system has the resources to accommodate that level of intense supervision for non-violent offenders.
A justice system that has farmed a lot of its probation monitoring activities out to the private sector. It's a profitable industry. Nick will have to pay for his drug and alcohol testing.

Hell, we've actually farmed a fair bit of the actual incarceration out to the private sector as well.

And no, I'm not defending it. I'm just saying. You might not be aware of this if you're not American.

For some reason, I only just noticed that April's charge is for weed.
It's not. It's for coke, as well. Albeit a smaller amount. Remember her credit card with the coke on it?

So can someone with actual legal knowledge explain what the scenario would be if Nick takes the guilty plea, but then gets charged with the cybercrime stuff regarding Aaron?
Exactly what you said. They would be treated as two separate offenses.
 
So can someone with actual legal knowledge explain what the scenario would be if Nick takes the guilty plea, but then gets charged with the cybercrime stuff regarding Aaron?
He's bound by whatever conditions there are for the first case, and can still be charged and punished for anything in the second case, too.

That's why if he has a remotely competent lawyer (Barneswalker lol), he'll try to get any plea as global as possible. The prosecution may already be using the threat of prosecuting him for that shit to compel him to plead to whatever unpalatable offer they put on the table for his preexisting charges.

But even if they haven't yet, they always could.

Fun fact: Nick could avoid situations like this by just taking this simple advice:
 
The underlying claim could still be wrong, of course, but I don't think it's being repeated by BBN maliciously, and with knowledge of falsehood by BBN.

Sounds like something the operator of BBN *would* say... I jest...! I jest...!

It should be noted the second one suggests he's looking to end it to preserve his own sanity though. Not for the good of his family. Nick doesn't GAS about his family.

Do we have the record of what comment Nick is replying to? I know PaedoMelty privates his stream chat after the fact, so we may not...
 
I keep running through my mind the idea that Nick may be facing the choice of his children or April. If BNN is to be trusted (and they have given little reason not to be) then my mind runs to the idea that not only is the court identifying April as the potential threat to the children, but Nick may be planning on selling her out as the provider/owner of the cocaine. If April could be pinned as the reason for a child being tested positive for coke, but could be the source of the coke, there's no way she leaves all these legal proceedings clean. Additionally, if Nick could point to April as to why one of his computers had access to Aaron's Google account, it may be a clean solution for him.

All of this said, this is cokehead logic at best and likely to fail.

Additionally, I get the impression Nick is only maintaining the illusion of a relationship with Kayla until court issues are over. His dream goal is a week in Vegas and then on to LA with April to become a shock jock / Dick Masterson wannabe with her as cohost. My gut says he's convinced that he's actually funning and interesting and that as soon as he can relieve himself of the Kayla and children burdens legally he will.
 
I'm just throwing this up here bc it seems smart. I've got 4 hours to get a turkey on the table.

View attachment 6697012
@AnOminous @Potentially Criminal - thoughts? This seems logical. It's as if the State has finally had enough.
It makes sense. I'd normally make a "no contact with Co-defendants" a recommendation for probation when I prosecuted, and I advise clients to expect such to be ordered by the court if they plea. Obviously that wouldn't apply to Nick and Kayla, but certainly a cretin like April needs to be a million miles away.

Even if the plea offer didn't explicitly state it, probation isn't going to let Nick hang out with people who have pending cases, criminal histories, and/or do drugs as one of his standard conditions of probation.

And I can 100% see Nick crying like a faggot over it. We already know what kind of regard he holds the prosecution and I doubt he views the judge as legitimate....imagine them having the nerve to tell Nicholas Robert motherfucking Rekieta who can't help him destigmatize the bedroom. Not even the Romans dared to tell Jesus who could be a disciple.
 
I think he actually did go in planning on that but then the deal was a lot worse than he was expecting because in his dumb hubris, he thinks that retarded motion Kayla filed was going to intimidate them somehow.
They will wipe their ass with that shit motion.

I still maintain that thing was mainly filed to throw more shit at Aaron, and not in any expectation it'll help Kayla any. Because it won't. You know it. I know it. The lawyers following this know it.

I'm sure he thought he'd get a better deal, but I'm not even sure if he's delusional enough to think Kayla's motion will go anywhere. If I were him, I'd be more concerned that that motion just pisses off the state even more. He needs to get over Aaron, but even if he doesn't, that's not the appropriate avenue to fling shit at Aaron.

Sounds like something the operator of BBN *would* say... I jest...! I jest...!
Damn! You got me! Okay, okay... I'm BBN!

But I am definitely not BBC. I am neither British, nor black. Don't you dare ever suggest that!

Do we have the record of what comment Nick is replying to? I know PaedoMelty privates his stream chat after the fact, so we may not...
@3MMA got it.

It's in response to continuing this whole farce of a defense. It wouldn't make sense for him to say that if he wanted to continue fighting. Because taking this shit to trial will extend this whole thing well into next year. If not longer.

@Cousin Eddie is only considering the $100 superchat, but if you read that together with the response to "cherokeegirl," it becomes much clearer why people now suspect he wants to plea out, and that, in his mind, "doing the right thing" would be him not digging in.

Bottom line: He takes this to trial, he's gonna be at it for a while, and lose anyways. He knows it too. At some point, even he has to be sick of banging his head up against the wall with nothing to show for it.

It makes sense. I'd normally make a "no contact with Co-defendants" a recommendation for probation when I prosecuted, and I advise clients to expect such to be ordered by the court if they plea. Obviously that wouldn't apply to Nick and Kayla, but certainly a cretin like April needs to be a million miles away.
Thank you!

Hopefully people will now stop saying that condition is ridiculous or somehow couldn't be part of a plea deal.
 
Last edited:
Even if the plea offer didn't explicitly state it, probation isn't going to let Nick hang out with people who have pending cases, criminal histories, and/or do drugs as one of his standard conditions of probation.
Does that mean probation officers can impose their own conditions in addition to those specified by the court/in the plea bargain?
 
Back on Twitter, doing his thing.

Archive
View attachment 6697476
Forgive me if I'm late/not the first to say this, but isn't it a pretty massive failure of logic to claim your daughter's never seen cocaine in her life while also claiming you have video of a cop touching her with cocaine-stained gloves and that's how she tested positive? He's so bad at lying.
 
Even if every allegation about black hookers and ppp in the cuck chair were true it was never gonna matter. Frankly I thought the metokur maschocist and other discord drama might have done them in especially after they pressed DSP on derich but they did the correct thing and just nuked it and moved on. If andy doing songs about him killing his kid wouldn't do them in it almost nothing short of one of their kids testing positive for cocaine would.
Even if the black hookers - cuck chair thing was real, would it even matter? They're both consenting adults that didn't put their degeneracy out onto the internet for us to gawk and laugh at, and they've consistently been sober every stream for a year. Attempting to distract from Nick's ongoing spiral into rock-bottom with this bullshit is small fries. PPP and Warski didn't give kids coke, they didn't livestream from Hedonism 2, they didn't wear the balldo, they didn't constantly cheat on their wives of 20 years with a coke whore in front of them, and they haven't been lying about being upstanding family men until they flipped overnight from drug and alcohol abuse. Anyone who knows PPP knows that the guy literally bent over and showed his asshole to a camera, and anyone who knows Warski knows about Cokeski Prime, the entire thing is a complete non-issue and an obvious gayop to distract from Nick's titanic fuckup he calls a life.

It makes sense. I'd normally make a "no contact with Co-defendants" a recommendation for probation when I prosecuted, and I advise clients to expect such to be ordered by the court if they plea. Obviously that wouldn't apply to Nick and Kayla, but certainly a cretin like April needs to be a million miles away.

Even if the plea offer didn't explicitly state it, probation isn't going to let Nick hang out with people who have pending cases, criminal histories, and/or do drugs as one of his standard conditions of probation.

And I can 100% see Nick crying like a faggot over it. We already know what kind of regard he holds the prosecution and I doubt he views the judge as legitimate....imagine them having the nerve to tell Nicholas Robert motherfucking Rekieta who can't help him destigmatize the bedroom. Not even the Romans dared to tell Jesus who could be a disciple.
y-yeah but didn't you know ur FAT? You eat too many sandwiches! haha, come on guys, it's funny! Get it? He's FAT?

I'd love to see how quickly Kayla and Nick fall apart once the coke whore is gone. Theres been speculation that nick didn't accept the plea because of a non-association clause, and if thats the case I'd assume nick is the biggest retard on the fucking planet.
 
Dessert:
-Cupboard bleach.
- Skunk and raccoon tartare :really:, with the finest Wal-Mart prepacked hard boiled egg in the middle
- Snapping Turtle sashimi, the thing is still alive :really:
- The freshest caviar, harvested directly from the source, himself... :really:

Edit: Also correct me if I'm wrong @AltisticRight but you don't have any particular knowledge of the MMS test methodology beyond what they post on their website right? Do you have confirmation they use benzoylecgonine as the specificity marker?
Technically correct, everything I posted was based off their website, a couple of their patent filings, and two documents I found on government websites.
They did test for benzoylecgonine, this was confirmed by skelly himself in a haze of druken xeets. He stated that a few are also missing, so presumably he was tested positive for more.

Is Kinochet American? There are some distinct non-American (British?) hints on the account such as "apologise," "dastardly," and an incisive ability to insult. (Fwiw, I don't care who it is. I find the account to be very entertaining.)
Kinochet or not, it's a decent enough account to see updates on. Although their Xeets often exceed one sentence, so it's not a BMJ-follower friendly account because two sentences is way too long.
I don't think they've outright lied or circulated obvious jokes so far. They're also pretty witty, Kinochet gets annoying and smug once people give him attention.
I also don't care who it is.

Seems they are back
Eighteen naked botch Black transvestite hookers in the showers at Kino Casino
Big hard throbbing GOCKS wanting to be sucked
Eighteen naked trannies wanting to be fucked
Hookers in the showers at Kino Casino
On their knees wanting to suck retard fatty cocks
Kino Casino really rocks
 
Back