Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 14.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 110 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 80 18.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 182 41.2%

  • Total voters
    442
Wait? What? There are people who think Nick has principles?

What planet is this happening on?
Somebody in this thread is arguing... badly... that Nick's "principle" is to fight this to the end.

Problem is, if that were the case, or Nick were really adamant about it, you would have seen a trial date set, instead of another settlement conference set for next month.

Nick's only principle here is to try and extricate himself from this situation with the least amount of restrictions placed upon him by the government. I don't even think he's dumb enough to think he's gonna beat everything. I used to think he'd push it all the way, but now I think he's got just enough functioning brain cells to know his legal situation is currently pretty grim.

His dream of skating was dashed when he didn't get his Franks hearing, and the appeals court told him they weren't gonna make the judge give him one. That leaves him with few options now. Even he likely knows a trial is the worst possible option for him.

Or, put another way, @Potentially Criminal was fucking right throughout all of this, and Nick's sandwich jokes are lame.

Fat > Coke brain
 
Even he likely knows a trial is the worst possible option for him.
thats where youre wrong because if he pussies out and doesnt take it to trial everyday i will mock him for being a BITCH that bent over and took it. the government supposedly coked up his daughter bashed down his door sullied his house and tried to have them taken away for no reason according to him, and he asked for another.
 
Not being a chemist, how does that 2.4 nanogrammes/milligram correlate to the levels of the test as reported by KCHHS, or are they non-transmutable?
I do not know how the numbers directly compare. The numbers I recall from Nick's child were "5000 with 500 cutoff." I also thought the levels reported with "pg/ml" rather than "ng/mg." The 2.4 number in the study was for cocaine where I believe the test the state used looked at was benzoylecgonine. In the study, the average childrens level of benzoylecgonine (740 pg/mg) was higher than the drug users (390 pg/mg). To me, that means speculation that Nick's kid must have been a regular user or must have suffered an OD doesn't follow from the study. The child, with environmental exposure, could have higher levels of metabolites than Nick and that would be consistent with the study.
 
@Captain Manning

Playing devil's advocate, Nick may have zero intention of going to trial, but could be intentionally stretching this out as long as possible for the following reasons:

1) It appears he's free of testing from now until probation.
2) He can see how Kayla's plea resolves
3) He gets to see April
4) He gets time to decide who he wants to be with if the divorce arc is incoming
5) He might want to be checking if the Aaron investigation concludes, at which point any charges could be combined into one plea deal.

Not saying these are strong or good reasons; only that they may be factors. Sane and rational people would have wanted this done and behind them as soon as possible. I wouldn't say Nick is either of those things.

I think the theory of the no contact order plays a big part, but also he wants to see how Kayla's challenge plays it. If there is a miracle and all that bullshit works then he will try to use it in his trial somehow.
 
Not being a chemist, how does that 2.4 nanogrammes/milligram correlate to the levels of the test as reported by KCHHS, or are they non-transmutable?
We're pretty sure her test was printed in pg/mg, because the preliminary immunoassay is typically printed in pg/mg or ng/10mg, and the cutoff is 500 when printed in pg/mg. 2.4 nanograms is 2400 picograms, the average level the study found, and the highest found was 14.4 ng/mg. Rekieta's 9 year old tested squarely within that range.
 
Not to derail about body cams but I'm confused why a plea would mean we couldn't get the body cam footage. Is body cam footage only available if a case goes to court? I was under the impression all bodycam footage was foia-able and the only hangup would be if you had to wait for an active case to be resolved before it was provided. Is that not the case? I really don't see what a plea would have to do with the footage either way, and I really don't see why a prosecutor would throw anything about footage into a deal either. Wasn't the entire point of body cams for police accountability to public? So if they are unable to be viewed unless they are officially entered in a court proceeding, what's even the point?
 
We're pretty sure her test was printed in pg/mg, because the preliminary immunoassay is typically printed in pg/mg or ng/10mg, and the cutoff is 500 when printed in pg/mg. 2.4 nanograms is 2400 picograms, the average level the study found, and the highest found was 14.4 ng/mg. Rekieta's 9 year old tested squarely within that range.

Yes, nano is 9 decimal places and pico is 12. So the range discussed is 2400 - 14400 baud picograms, with the Rekieta child scoring 5000.

What’s not clear to me from that abstract, is whether the children tested with high readings had consumed cocaine. The title “drug users’ children” implies they did not. But if the test levels match those of the using adult, surely they are also being intoxicated.
 
Last edited:
Man, Kayla better start pulling up real fucking fast if she wants to get saved. There’s an ample bosomed piss MILF in Costa Rica who has stolen my heart.

Surprisingly, a woman who thinks drinking urine is healthy seems to have it more together than a lawyers wife in Minnesota. Shit, I bet anyone in the urine therapy thread is overall more wholesome and healthy than the Rekietas.
 
"no contact with Co-defendants"
So would this still be happening if Nick had admitted to the coke being his? Didn't they charge April cause they still need to figure out how much of the coke was hers? Otherwise all they'd have on her would be taking coke and with her being a first time offender (iirc) doesn't that mean she would've been slapped with a fine and sent home or did the whole "she's the live-in nanny" comment from Kayla already doom her by tying her to the house and all the shit that went down? Nick dragging in Ape and causing the no contact part of the plea with his gay attempts at 4d chess would be the funniest way he could've felted himself out of being with April.
 
So would this still be happening if Nick had admitted to the coke being his? Didn't they charge April cause they still need to figure out how much of the coke was hers? Otherwise all they'd have on her would be taking coke and with her being a first time offender (iirc) doesn't that mean she would've been slapped with a fine and sent home or did the whole "she's the live-in nanny" comment from Kayla already doom her by tying her to the house and all the shit that went down? Nick dragging in Ape and causing the no contact part of the plea with his gay attempts at 4d chess would be the funniest way he could've felted himself out of being with April.
I may be wrong but iirc everybody involved gets charged for all the coke in this type of situation. The reason (I believe) they waited to charge April is because they thought they could get her to flip on the others and when it became apparent she would not, they decided to charge her. That's just guesswork.
 
So would this still be happening if Nick had admitted to the coke being his? Didn't they charge April cause they still need to figure out how much of the coke was hers? Otherwise all they'd have on her would be taking coke and with her being a first time offender (iirc) doesn't that mean she would've been slapped with a fine and sent home or did the whole "she's the live-in nanny" comment from Kayla already doom her by tying her to the house and all the shit that went down? Nick dragging in Ape and causing the no contact part of the plea with his gay attempts at 4d chess would be the funniest way he could've felted himself out of being with April.
Nick and Kayla are charged because it is their residence and anything inside the residence is presumed to be theirs.
Either of them could have taken responsibility for the cocaine and helped the other one get a better deal, and presumably a healthy relationship would have seen them work together to get the best possible deal for each of them and make sure that they are present as parents in their children's lives.

The fact that none of that really happened here tells you a lot about how healthy that marriage still is.
I may be wrong but iirc everybody involved gets charged for all the coke in this type of situation. The reason (I believe) they waited to charge April is because they thought they could get her to flip on the others and when it became apparent she would not, they decided to charge her. That's just guesswork.
The residents get charged, since Nick told the cops that April was a guest, the charges against her were dropped because the same presumption of ownership does not apply to guests. They then charged her with the 5th degree felony because of her credit card on the coke nightstand.
 
Back