Inactive Shmorky / David Kelly / Daisy Kay / Sandypants / Peaches the Puppy & Ex-Fiance Amanda "Mandy" Mullen - Something Awful throwaway, pedophile sexual predator, abusive tranny schizo chaser; batshit crazy ex-fiancée

[Oekaki Hellion]

For all we know this could actually BE Shmorky.
I mean it was made today and he did start coming back online today, plus ya' know, the account had a meltdown and he's very prone to that!
But again it just could be one of his Tumblr fans :/

So maybe I am the only one who gets this but a feverfew looks exactly like a daisy and the two are often confused. The feverfew is a medicinal plant. Why the fuck would someone instantly jump into that shit pit and have such an obvious name?

Also I gotta remind people that Dave Kelly has been luring in young vulnerable women in the art community since 2001 and using their conditions and tribulations as a form of control and a way to mock and discredit them after they leave him. As well as his obsession with having multiple online identities to back himself up or harass others or even himself with for pity. That is a 16 year track record people. From what I have read up on he was doing this to goons as well since 2004.

Someone on SA has to know more about this cause its an open secret he creeped on female fans of his there for a decade. Maybe we can finally stop this mad beast from taking another victim.

 

[CharlesBarkley]

For all we know this could actually BE Shmorky.
I mean it was made today and he did start coming back online today, plus ya' know, the account had a meltdown and he's very prone to that!
But again it just could be one of his Tumblr fans :/

Mmm...

I'm just saying if what you've seen of shmorky's reaction online strikes you as "unapologetic" and "playing the victim" like again, I'm gonna have to come in here later to tell you how PTSD victims tend to behave and how these actions are specifically reactions to the PTSD

Pretty sure this is 100% Shmorky.

 

[umbasa]

Finding proof of him being a babypiss pedo is going to give him double PTSD.

Hiding behind PTSD and being a sex/gender/whatever minority meaning you just have to be a fucked up weirdo that can only survive on the internet is deplorable.

 

[Tard]

Can someone get lowtax to check if this is him or not? Like having the same IP address as shmorky or something?
Or a mod?

 

[Colorfinger]

Can someone get lowtax to check if this is him or not? Like having the same IP address as shmorky or something?
Or a mod?

The only people who can do that on SA are admins. I'd ask, but none of the people I know from back in the day are admins anymore.

 

[Gabriel]

One of my thoughts was that it read like something Shmorky might write, because of a few details in there. The poster changed the age of carefully to 17, which is a strange detail to get wrong considering how much they have clearly followed the shmorky situation for a long time.

Then there are all the personal digs at lowtax, eg 'because Lowtax from everything I've read about you you seem like kind of an unpleasant individual to be around', which seems weird because purely going on what I've read about Lowtax I don't have much of a mental image of how the guy is in person at all, apart from that he got punched out by Uwe Boll.

Then this:



This especially reads like it's more Shmorky lashing out at Lowtax & the internet in general for the situation he's in now, plus salt from the whole 'recording his girlfriend' incident.

I don't know, I could be reaching at straws here, but the Sandy thing seemed like that too for a while.

Those comments really sound like some personal issues are in there! It really could be him.

 

[Todesfurcht]

Spoiler

listen, i get it. you should hold onto that, having a strong moral compass is a good thing.

the thing is, though, like everyone already said, Dave did this to himself. he was the one that located, groomed, and coerced a child into being his fetish vehicle (and he would gleefully do it again if you give him the chance). he is the one that antagonized his partner into a mental breakdown to spin it into free asspats on Twitter. he is the one that is showing no remorse, only fear that he was caught.

he's banking on your moral compass. believe me, i'm a horrendously empathetic person, but i was also a very suicidal person. Dave is not actually going to kill himself. Dave is not actually suicidal. he is nothing more than a coward backed into a corner out of fear, and he's using your moral compass to manipulate you into mistaking fear for despair. when i wanted to die, i had no concerns about anything, because nothing mattered. people like Dave aren't suicidal. suicidal people don't care about letting people know. suicidal people have no concern for creating a public outcry, because they know they're not gonna be around to see it anyway. suicidal people don't care about fanfare.

suicidal people only care about commiting suicide, because real suicidal people want to die, not give people the time required to prevent them from dying.

and you know what else? even if he is in a state of despair, it's really worth reiterating that he did this to himself. we're not just bullying some weirdo in a diaper over the internet, we're making this man face consequences for serious, atrocious situations he created that shouldn't have existed. we're making him face repercussions like an adult. if he wants to die, it's because he ruined his own life by having the audacity to ruin someone else's.

i get where you're coming from, it's just a kind of energy better saved for people worth the air they breathe.

Thank you for the calm and informative response!
I haven't been following the thread very closely. Carry on.

 

[Frenda]

this is kind of late but can someone explain to me how we know, or point me to the post that confirms that, Peaches the Puppy and Sandypants are the same person? i absolutely believe they're both Shmorky based off all the evidence posted here, but i'm just not getting how the connection between the Peaches and Sandy accounts specifically was made, other than someone just offhandedly mentioning that the Peaches account was abandoned and the user took up the Sandypants handle. i don't see anything on either profile actually confirming it. is this just something that's supposed to be widely known?

 

[R.J. MacReady]

I was checking out the Shmorky thread on SA and some bizarre individual registered an account purely to defend Shmorky, then had a meltdown:

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3803719&userid=220132

In case the site goes paywalled again here is an imgur gallery of their first big meltdown post:

http://imgur.com/a/ETnXQ

> defending Chris-Chan, Zoe Quinn and Brianna Wu for being "harassed" as if mocking a handler-less retard, a scam artist whore, and an entitled psycho respectively is anything similar to presenting evidence about a pedophile
> "what post are you talking about where does tumblr say that they're "ignoring the evidence?"" how about all of these, and i'm still updating it
> "Did you know that domestic abuse victims are statistically disbelieved when they come forward about abuse, unless they have recorded evidence, as domestic abuse is extremely difficult to prove?" he says, ignoring the fact that a victim came forward to out Shmorky for abuse, with 91 pages of proof
> "taking everything at face value" no, that's what tumblr did when someone wrote a blatantly fake "call-out" post about someone with no proof.
> [some drivel about PTSD as if it changes the fact that he antagonized his ex in a villainous way publically on Twitter after suffering so-called "abuse" by her]

if this isn't Dave, it's someone with an equally low IQ (and self-respect to match)

Thank you for the calm and informative response!
I haven't been following the thread very closely. Carry on.

s'all good, dude, there's no sin in being a good person. it's just a shame that people take advantage of it.

 

[Gabriel]

This is just the whole thread now.

 

[InLivingTuna]

his is kind of late but can someone explain to me how we know, or point me to the post that confirms that, Peaches the Puppy and Sandypants are the same person? i absolutely believe they're both Shmorky based off all the evidence posted here, but i'm just not getting how the connection between the Peaches and Sandy accounts specifically was made, other than someone just offhandedly mentioning that the Peaches account was abandoned and the user took up the Sandypants handle. i don't see anything on either profile actually confirming it. is this just something that's supposed to be widely known?

It's in the OP. Everything ever is in the OP.

 

[Windows 98]

here I thought he took his ex-girlfriend's medication as means to manipulate and gaslight her but it was all because of PTSD, nevermind, it all makes sense now. everybody go home.

 

[Look! A Horse!]

> defending Chris-Chan, Zoe Quinn and Brianna Wu for being "harassed" as if mocking a handler-less exceptional individual, a scam artist whore, and an entitled psycho respectively is anything similar to presenting evidence about a pedophile
> "what post are you talking about where does tumblr say that they're "ignoring the evidence?"" how about all of these, and i'm still updating it
> "Did you know that domestic abuse victims are statistically disbelieved when they come forward about abuse, unless they have recorded evidence, as domestic abuse is extremely difficult to prove?" he says, ignoring the fact that a victim came forward to out Shmorky for abuse, with 91 pages of proof
> "taking everything at face value" no, that's what tumblr did when someone wrote a blatantly fake "call-out" post about someone with no proof.
> [some drivel about PTSD as if it changes the fact that he antagonized his ex in a villainous way publically on Twitter after suffering so-called "abuse" by her]

if this isn't Dave, it's someone with an equally low IQ (and self-respect to match)

s'all good, dude, there's no sin in being a good person. it's just a shame that people take advantage of it.

for me, the big clues that this is Dave are

1) insisting the Shmorky is a celebrity, with all the pressure that entails. I've never really seen Shmorky described that way by ANYONE, except this one dude on SA. And we all know Shmorky has a huge ego

2) the amount of personal bitterness about Lowtax. This poster seems personally embittered about the what happened between lowtax and shmorky.

 

[Gabriel]

for me, the big clues that this is Dave are

1) insisting the Shmorky is a celebrity, with all the pressure that entails. I've never really seen Shmorky described that way by ANYONE, except this one dude on SA. And we all know Shmorky has a huge ego

2) the amount of personal bitterness about Lowtax. This poster seems personally embittered about the what happened between lowtax and shmorky.

Like I said, it seemed like something personal was there. Also yeah the whole celebrity thing is kind of a big giveaway.
I also got a feeling from the whole mentioning "minorities" and "trans" because that's something he would bring up.

 

[repentance]

I might be misremembering but I have a vague recollection of Shmorky doing the suicide baiting stuff in the past. I can't recall what provoked it though. Do any fellow SA posters remember this?

Like I said, it seemed like something personal was there. Also yeah the whole celebrity thing is kind of a big giveaway.
I also got a feeling from the whole mentioning "minorities" and "trans" because that's something he would bring up.

Apart from comments about Lowtax seeming very personal, the other thing which pinged my Shmorky radar was the comment about Wu. Even on the SJW side, few people perceive Wu as "vulnerable". Shmorky perceives himself as both vulnerable and as a victim, so it's not a huge stretch to me that he'd project that onto people he thinks we "target" without reason.

The justifications also seem way too personal.

 

[Jewelsmakerguy]

...
Have we been doing something wrong?

I don't know what's going on anymore!

 

[Buddha]

I did a thing.
https://clyp.it/dhnrohz5

Awesome work. Now I really want to hear remixed vocals too.

Also thanks for the thread in general, everyone.

 

[Gabriel]

I don't know what's going on anymore!

We are the new trans life line except we actually make progress.

 

[Colorfinger]

I know this is long since covered, but his old AIM names that he used to talk to me were cavedeli and sashmorky

Not sure if anybody was still questioning whether cavedeli was him, but it pretty obviously was. I went through my Trillian and unfortunately all my older chatlogs are gone. The only thing I have left is a brief chatlog from 2012 where I pointed out to him that Soulja Boy was following him on Twitter. Again, not very interesting, but it's all I've got - and in the spirit of sharing, now you have it too.

Session Start (SAColorfinger:sashmorky): Tue Jan 24 19:15:50 2012 -0800
sashmorky: I herd he likes webcomics
sashmorky: for real?
sashmorky: hahaha
sashmorky: Okay I know Souljaboy is following over 3k people but why am I one of them
sashmorky: reloading his follow page
sashmorky: seems almost random
SAColorfinger: i dont know
sashmorky: now he got seth green and Disney
sashmorky: hahaha
sashmorky: why
SAColorfinger: maybe he just follows random crap
sashmorky: Who has that kind of time in the day
SAColorfinger: rappers?
sashmorky: hahaha
sashmorky: no way
sashmorky: a rapper is always makin music and getting paid
SAColorfinger: anyway so we should pitch peezle ward to adult swim
sashmorky: keep refreshing: (Link: https://twitter.com/#!/souljaboy/following)https://twitter.com/#!/souljaboy/following
sashmorky: haha it keeps happening
SAColorfinger: what do you think
Session Close (sashmorky): Wed Jan 25 08:48:31 2012 -0800

 

[Gabriel]

this is kind of late but can someone explain to me how we know, or point me to the post that confirms that, Peaches the Puppy and Sandypants are the same person? i absolutely believe they're both Shmorky based off all the evidence posted here, but i'm just not getting how the connection between the Peaches and Sandy accounts specifically was made, other than someone just offhandedly mentioning that the Peaches account was abandoned and the user took up the Sandypants handle. i don't see anything on either profile actually confirming it. is this just something that's supposed to be widely known?

Hun, go back through the post and read yourself, it's not that far off, it was like 2 pages ago.