Dr Sidhbh Treasa Gallagher / "Dr Teetus Deletus" / Gallagher Plastic Surgery / Gallagher Med Spa / @drsidhbhgallagher/ @dr_sgallagher / @gendersurgeon - Sex change surgeon who uses TikTok to advertise her teet yeeting services to depressed children

She looks particularly ghoulish here. Shibby is not aging well.
She's much like "all vulvas are valid" Birthing Person Jones, who's 37 yet looks like she's 55. Yeah I get being an obgyn would be stressful but it's justified because of how she raged against a doula who wanted women to be centered in their healthcare.
It's not your fault. Today or in the 20th century whether in the US or Ireland or wherever she would have been some kind of nun or nurse and inflicted harm upon others. I can imagine what she would have done.
She would've been involved in the Magdalene Laundries. Knowing her, she would've enjoyed that torture.
 
I'm legitimately surprised she's not commented on the election considering what Trump's saying about her specialty.
1731035544369.png
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6673633
Apparently this video went viral. She's going to chop as many tits off as she can before the next administration gets in, apparently.
She no longer takes insurance either:


I'm sure insurance doesn't want to pay for shit like this:
 
View attachment 6673633
Apparently this video went viral. She's going to chop as many tits off as she can before the next administration gets in, apparently.
I hope Trump sets up a special commission to prosecute this foul cunt and any other surgeon who has mutilated minors.
There needs to be jail time for these bastards and fortiture of all their assets to be put into a fund to help Detransitioners.
Anyone involved in doing this shit to minors should be charged with Crimes Against Humanity.
 
Attachment:
GdQ6n1iacAAf1ru.jpeg
Notice the jurisdiction and timing here: The surgery was done while Dr. Sneed was still living and working in Indiana.

Suddenly my theory that she left Indiana to avoid legal liability is seeming a whole lot more credible.

Edit to Add: It's not very nice of Exulansic to only share a screencap of one page from the complaint when this case is already concluded. With this in mind I have attached

(1) The Complaint. Here is the relevant portion, all that's left to be said is we got 'er - seems she was lying about malpractice insurance as well:

SufferSneed.png

(2) The answer (to allegations in the complaint). For reasons I do not fully understand the defendant here is the head of the Indiana Insurance Board vice Sneed herself, and the defendant (the head of a government agency) denies knowing anything about a ruling by the medical board (another government agency).

(3) A joint motion for a payout in excess of Indiana's damages cap and (4) the judge's order approving it. If I am reading it right Sneed's insurer covered the first $500k while the Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund covered the remaining $1.3 million.

The case appears to be closed due to the settlement.

Now comes the part where we put on our tinfoil hats. Sneed operated on this girl in early March 2020, and she died in late March 2020. Assuming the medical board started its investigation some time in 2020, that could explain why Sneed stopped carrying malpractice insurance post move to Florida - the rates would be extremely high assuming she could find anyone willing to cover her. The even more interesting part is in the OP - if its timeline is right Sneed got her Florida medical license in Spring of 2019. Looks to me like she was planning the move for a while, and based on what we know now I would not be surprised if this was not her first malpractice suit and this was the one that finally made her pull the trigger and leave.

Edit x2: I decided to look up cases involving Sneed as a defendant in the Indiana court records database, nothing scandalous but she did get caught sneeding speeding about six years ago.
SneedForSpeed-1.png
SneedForSpeed-2.png


Edit x3: The settlement for $1.8 million ($500k from Sneed, $1.3 million from the patient's compensation fund) appears to be the absolute maximum under Indiana law.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
She no longer takes insurance either:
View attachment 6673779
As if: “Yeah we will go full sweatshop and try to lop off as many tits as possible in the next couple of months!” wasn’t a big enough warning sign, the fact that insurance companies don’t trust her is a goddamn massive red flag.
I'm sure insurance doesn't want to pay for shit like this:
View attachment 6673784

Wowza! Look at those birther hips. Tranny would kill for those. Literally kill and wear as a skin suit.
 
I'm always interested in these case. I work in a heart/lungs hospital so obviously we get dead people. Even the best surgeon lose people.
What i'm wondering is how you get to that doing tit yeets. Anaesthesia can be a problem but i don't think the surgeon get blamed in those cases. wtf was she doing ?
Infection maybe. There were a couple times something similar came up in this thread:
Patient writes that they only needed to go to the ER for a staph infection requiring IV antibiotics and an emergency abscess drain because they didn’t contact Dr Sidhbh Gallagher for oral antibiotics soon enough. It is one thing to let a patient know that they should bring up concerns as soon as possible, but another to make your patient feel like they should specify that their not calling is why they needed IV antibiotics and emergency care (even if, in part, it is- sometimes these things happen and you just choose not to be an arse about it especially when you can see how vulnerable someone is.)
 
I'm always interested in these case. I work in a heart/lungs hospital so obviously we get dead people. Even the best surgeon lose people.
What i'm wondering is how you get to that doing tit yeets. Anaesthesia can be a problem but i don't think the surgeon get blamed in those cases. wtf was she doing ?
Cause of death was pulmonary embolism from some degree of surgical malpractice. So she somehow got clots forming in the major blood vessels. The surgery was probably a breast reduction, which is much more complicated. And not a straight up lop em off.
 
Cause of death was pulmonary embolism from some degree of surgical malpractice. So she somehow got clots forming in the major blood vessels. The surgery was probably a breast reduction, which is much more complicated. And not a straight up lop em off.
Ok makes a bit more sense, pulmonary embolism are nasty and can happen in a myriad of ways, especially if you are a incompetent activist retard like her.
 
Ok makes a bit more sense, pulmonary embolism are nasty and can happen in a myriad of ways, especially if you are a incompetent activist retard like her.
PE's can happen in the best situations, they're a consequence of operating/inactivity/hypercoaguable states... but they're not 100% predictable and the plaintiff died almost a month after the surgery.

Devil's advocating here but it's not shown here that Sidbh could have prevented this one. It wasn't an infection, it wasn't a consequence of the surgery itself being botched necessarily. The family seem to be arguing that she gave inadequate follow-up instructions, however, even physicians who give great ones still get sued by patients who don't pay attention to them. Obviously, she could have saved the girl's life by not giving a breast reduction in the first place. Gallagher didn't argue any facts in those filings, just instantly settled... which would also be the right strategy if she was practicing to standard, and wanted to save on lawyer fees, given a sympathetic plaintiff can make trials very risky. Judges and juries are notoriously terrible when facts are relevant in malpractice suits, and a physician successfully defending themselves often involves really, really, like truly hideously expensive expert witness testimony. The patient would have had opportunities to seek out other opinions in the time frame, seek emergency care, etc. so it's really hard to pin this one onto one person necessarily.

It chaps my ass to be defending Gallagher in any way but this specific case is not a clear smoking gun for her incompetence. Her TikTok is though.
 
(2) The answer (to allegations in the complaint). For reasons I do not fully understand the defendant here is the head of the Indiana Insurance Board vice Sneed herself, and the defendant (the head of a government agency) denies knowing anything about a ruling by the medical board (another government agency).
This is based on a legal principle called subrogation, which is when an insurance company (or in this case a government body that effectively insures the public) pays out on a claim, but then inherits the derived creditor relationship the original claimant would have had, and sues for compensation for the payment from the responsible party.

So for instance, someone crashes into your car. Your insurance immediately pays out, but then goes to collect against the person who hit you, essentially standing in your shoes for the purpose of the suit.
Devil's advocating here but it's not shown here that Sidbh could have prevented this one. It wasn't an infection, it wasn't a consequence of the surgery itself being botched necessarily.
I disagree. You don't see judgments in excess of policy limits and to the statutory maximum for simple error. I'm not even going to dig into the specifics of this case because this butcher's entire practice consists of utter quackery.
 
Back