Disaster Men are more dependent on committed relationships than women, new study shows

Men are more dependent on committed relationships than women, new study shows
by Jessie Tu | 14 hours ago
Is that a fucking gorilla.webp
LINK | ARCHIVE

Men place more importance on finding a long-term partner and rely more heavily on romantic relationships than women, a new study from Amsterdam has found.

According to the forthcoming study published in the journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences, researchers found that men are more dependent on being in stable, committed relationships than women.

One reason posited by one of the study’s authors, Paul van Lange, is that many men rely on their female partners to manage practical household responsibilities. Men also tend to have higher sexual needs, according to van Lange, which are more likely to be fulfilled within a committed relationship.

Another reason why relationships hold greater significance for men than women could be that men find it easier to exhibit emotional vulnerability only within the context of a romantic partnership, whereas women can often easily express emotional vulnerability more broadly, and across multiple contexts, such as with friends, family, colleagues, and thereby minimising their reliance on a single partner.

“Our society emphasises that boys should be less emotionally expressive,” Van Lange said. This social conditioning means that men tend to rely more heavily on just one intimate partner for their emotional connection.

Along with his colleagues Iris Wahring and Jeffry Simpson, van Lange, a psychology professor at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, reviewed a range of scientific literature on gender differences in heterosexual relationships to find also that women initiate separations more often than men. In fact, the research found that 70 per cent of divorces are instigated by women.

“Men often feel lonelier after a breakup, while women more frequently report a sense of relief,” Van Lange said, adding that the disparity of needs also extends to health outcomes.

“Men’s life expectancy is more closely linked to having a committed relationship than women’s,” Van Lange said. “We’re seeing a shift toward smaller differences between men and women.”

Another recent study from the US found that a correlation between a man’s intelligence level and his degree of relationship investment within a romantic relationship.
 
I hate the picture in the Article/OP

Nigger looks like a dude and isn't even smiling back at the white guy

White guy looks like a beta soycuck with a smile that hides how dead he is inside

And the left is supposed to act like this is normal behavior. Spoiler Alert: It's Not!
 
I see lots of those couples with a Liliputian white dude and a black Amazonian woman every day. Very common interracial couple.

Reminds me of Serena Williams and that Reddit dweeb. Must be tough when your wife has a bigger penis than you and could beat you up.
 
Another reason why relationships hold greater significance for men than women could be that men find it easier to exhibit emotional vulnerability only within the context of a romantic partnership, whereas women can often easily express emotional vulnerability more broadly, and across multiple contexts, such as with friends, family, colleagues, and thereby minimising their reliance on a single partner.
What is this sexist horseshit that keeps getting trotted out? Who are they studying? What age groups? I’ve commiserated with my bros, and never had a single issue accurately describing my emotional state, at any time, even when I’m incensed. Where are these emotionally repressed men who can’t talk about their emotions to anyone with a penis? I’ve never met one.
 
Well duh. In most mammals, humans included, males are the ones expected to do the courtship so once you've worked on a lady for a while you are kind of in the right to expect that effort to pay off. If the relationship falls apart he wasted a lot of energy on nothing. I really can't blame men for their somewhat bitter attidude these days. There's plenty of good women out there but wading trough the trash seems like a one shitty task. Doesn't help that men are increasingly treaded like emotionally stunted, violent, useless and disposable sperm donors in media. It shouldn't surprise us that men crave love too but for some reason it does
 
“Our society emphasises that boys should be less emotionally expressive,” Van Lange said. This social conditioning means that men tend to rely more heavily on just one intimate partner for their emotional connection.
When men are "emotionally vulnerable " it gets used as a weapon against them by the same people telling them they should be emotionally vulnerable.
 
This seems pretty true. Men get thrown into the wood chipper of life, feet first, at an early age. They absolutely do a lot better having someone at home to hold down the fort. Some kind of stability in their lives.

If they have that, they're a lot more confident in going out to be the sharp end of the stick out in the world. Lol you're going to be doing it regardless, you're just a lot happier and more stable knowing you have something to come home to other than the bottle.

If you have nothing to live for, despair sets in and you get into all kinds of trouble, alcohol, drugs, crime. We all need a support network in our lives. Women develop those support networks far easier than men do. Part of that is socialization, but also in the form of society reaching out and taking greater care of women than men, as they're a more precious societal asset.

Women are objects; men are disposable.
“Our society emphasises that boys should be less emotionally expressive,” Van Lange said. This social conditioning means that men tend to rely more heavily on just one intimate partner for their emotional connection.
This is retarded. This stuff is heavily informed by biology. These dipshits refuse to acknowledge it.
 
I hate the picture in the Article/OP

Nigger looks like a dude and isn't even smiling back at the white guy

White guy looks like a beta soycuck with a smile that hides how dead he is inside

And the left is supposed to act like this is normal behavior. Spoiler Alert: It's Not!

Black chick and a "white dude" maybe not all that normal IRL but I like seeing that kind of pairing in my media. Admen and journoslimes are claiming white male ownership of POC women! (And Here's Why That's Based As Hell!)

They look AI or chopped though, like the AI was told to generate a couple of that demo without looking too much like big mike and pete buttplug but it got confused on that point.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
This type of research makes a big argument against transitioning, which seems to absolutely tank men's long-term relationship stability and likely cuts into life expectancy for that reason alone. Can't seem to find research already done on this but I would speculate that any fetish behaviour significant enough to impair relationship stability would actually be life limiting to some degree, especially in men that develop complex health comorbidities later in life (when the Wife Bonus seriously kicks in).

Marriages help preserve wealth within the family more effectively through inheritances, shared workplace benefits, divisions of labour for child-rearing, and home ownership. It'd be interesting to see if any of this data holds up for men who don't have children. It would also be interesting to see if having good relationships with adult children in your senior years can compensate for being a single male. There's a Danish study that showed straights still having the highest life expectancy as of 2013, but gay marriages were 1% of the sample so hard to say.
 
Nigger looks like a dude and isn't even smiling back at the white guy

White guy looks like a beta soycuck with a smile that hides how dead he is inside
Because of a still image that isn't even genuine? They're not having a real date, they're posing for a photo.

Let's be real, you would have said that about the guy regardless of everything, looks like a normal dude to me.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SIMIΔN
This seems pretty true. Men get thrown into the wood chipper of life, feet first, at an early age. They absolutely do a lot better having someone at home to hold down the fort. Some kind of stability in their lives.

If they have that, they're a lot more confident in going out to be the sharp end of the stick out in the world. Lol you're going to be doing it regardless, you're just a lot happier and more stable knowing you have something to come home to other than the bottle.

If you have nothing to live for, despair sets in and you get into all kinds of trouble, alcohol, drugs, crime. We all need a support network in our lives. Women develop those support networks far easier than men do. Part of that is socialization, but also in the form of society reaching out and taking greater care of women than men, as they're a more precious societal asset.

Women are objects; men are disposable.

This is retarded. This stuff is heavily informed by biology. These dipshits refuse to acknowledge it.
Yeah, it's retarded but it sucks that a lotta boys don't get the support they need.
 
I’ve commiserated with my bros, and never had a single issue accurately describing my emotional state, at any time, even when I’m incensed. Where are these emotionally repressed men who can’t talk about their emotions to anyone with a penis? I’ve never met one.

I think part of it is that people don't ask (or care about) how men are doing in general.

So your average guy with less of a filter may trauma dump on an unsolicited, unprepared person in their lives. But the more stoic types will never really get the chance.

I had a male acquaintance hint several times this weekend in our brief interactions that he was suffering from prolonged depression when I was inquiring about something as banal as what vidya he was currently enjoying.

And even myself who is better equipped than most to handle such heavy dialogue mostly tiptoed around it.
 
Back