EU EU births drop to new low as strains on younger generations mount - Dearth of children expected to heap pressure on state finances

EU births drop to new low as strains on younger generations mount
Financial Times (archive.ph)
By Valentina Romei
2024-12-03 05:00:16GMT

The number of babies born in the EU hit a record low last year, according to official data that highlights the severity of the region’s demographic challenges.

Births across the 27 member states in the bloc fell to 3,665,000 in 2023, according to figures updated last month, the lowest since comparable data was first collected in 1961.

The figure also represented a 5.5 per cent fall from 2022’s total of births — the largest annual decline on record.

The data was compiled from the latest member state figures by Eurostat, the EU’s statistical office, and was contained in a periodic update of its spreadsheet.

The 2023 figure is lower than the 4mn EU births forecast last year in Eurostat’s long-term population projections.

Since reaching a peak of nearly 7mn births in the mid-1960s, birth rates in the nations that now make up the EU have declined sharply and are around the same level as in the US.

Europe’s dearth of children is expected to heap pressure on state finances, as working-age populations shrink and the cost of spending in areas such as healthcare and pensions rises.

Demographic experts believe the long-standing trend of Europeans having fewer and fewer babies may have been exacerbated by concerns over climate change, the pandemic and the worst surge in inflation in a generation.

“It is possible that the perceived uncertainties — such as . . . job insecurity, rising costs of living and housing prices, and multiple global crises, including the Covid-19 pandemic, geopolitical tensions and climate change — could negatively affect individual reproductive decisions,” said Guangyu Zhang, population affairs officer at the UN.

“Youngsters have greater difficulty than before to establish themselves in the labour market, in the housing market, and perhaps also in the dating market,” said Willem Adema, senior economist at the OECD. “That is one part of the story which is fairly clear.”

Maria Rita Testa, a professor of demography at Luiss University in Rome, said that while many factors affected the decision to have children, there were new reasons related to political and economic “tensions at the international level”, as well as “concerns over climate change”.

As people delay parenthood, women in the region are giving birth at a later age.

Eurostat figures published earlier this year showed the average age of women at the birth of their first child was rising, and was nearly 30 in 2022, up from 28.8 in 2013.

The share of births among mothers aged 40 and above has more than doubled over the past decade rising from 2.5 per cent to 6 per cent, reflecting a delay in parenthood, with many women choosing to have children closer to the upper limit of the reproductive age range, which the UN defines as ending at 49 years old.

The trend in people having fewer children is seen most sharply in Italy, Spain, Greece, Poland, Finland and the Baltic states — where births have fallen by at least a quarter over the past decade.

Adema said governments should prepare for a future of low fertility and consider steps to boost immigration, productivity and levels of labour force participation, particularly among women.

Testa urged governments to support young people, calling for an “approach where young men and women are helped in several life domains: in education, in the labour market, in mental health and in accessing affordable housing”.
 
Adema said governments should prepare for a future of low fertility and consider steps to boost immigration, productivity and levels of labour force participation, particularly among women.
“Adema is committed to making the problem worse in every way.”
 
If you use all of the power of the state and organs of the media to convince a sizeable segment of the population that the planet is on the brink of fiery extinction, don't be surprised if they opt to not have children. People get married and make babies when there's hope for the future. Children are living symbols of that hope. Take it away and everything falls apart.

Elon Musk said in an interview that one of the factors that swayed his decision to move to the right was that many of the uber-rich and powerful people he knew--all of them Leftist--essentially viewed humanity as a kind of disease. To them, we are the problem that needs to be solved; thus, they have actively sought ways to reduce the human population to what they consider acceptable levels.

Climate change is a massive hoax. COVID-19 was developed in a lab in China. Everything you know is wrong.
 
Adema said governments should prepare for a future of low fertility and consider steps to boost immigration, productivity and levels of labour force participation, particularly among women.
Untitled.jpg


Willem Adema is a Senior Economist in the OECD Social Policy Division. Willem leads a team of analysts of Family, Gender and Housing policies and is responsible for the OECD Family database; the OECD Gender Initiative and the OECD Gender Data Portal; the OECD Social Expenditure database and the OECD Affordable Housing Database; and, social and family policy work with the OECD/Korea Policy Centre.
In recent years - 2017-2020, Willem and colleagues prepared the following OECD reports: Policy briefs on Affordable Housing; Social Housing; Homelessness; COVID-19 and Women; COVID-19 and Children; Policies for Affordable Housing in Latvia; Rejuvenating Korea, Policies for a Changing Society; Is the last mile the longest? on economic gains from gender equality in Nordic Countries; the Pursuit of Gender Equality - an Uphill Battle; Dare to Share, Society at a Glance Asia/Pacific; A Decade of Social Protection Development in Selected Asian Countries; and two updates of the OECD Social Expenditure Database - SOCX.

At an earlier stage Willem and colleagues wrote extensively on a wide range of social, family and gender policy issues, including the OECD Babies and Bosses Reviews (the 2000s), the OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Reviews of Chile, Israel and Russia, Doing Better for Families and Closing the Gender Gap - Act Now (early 2010s).

Willem graduated from the Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam and holds a doctorate from St. Edmund Hall, University of Oxford.

firefox_At9KNU0dG2.png
I included a HTML rip of his Linked In page.
 

Attachments

Yeah, the whole pile of bullshit involving "line go up" starts to really fall apart as the enormous ponzi scheme it is when the most important line of all, "live births per year", is the line that doesn't go up any longer.

Don't get me wrong "live births per year" as the line that always goes up without fail really was a fairly solid bet, there hasn't been a time in recorded human history where that hasn't happened. As such, building a system based on that idea wasn't a bad idea, in general, in and of itself. The problem was that they never had a backup plan in the event, for any reason, suddenly that line didn't keep going up.
 
Last edited:
The share of births among mothers aged 40 and above has more than doubled over the past decade rising from 2.5 per cent to 6 per cent, reflecting a delay in parenthood, with many women choosing to have children closer to the upper limit of the reproductive age range, which the UN defines as ending at 49 years old.
I don't understand why people do this. It was hard enough having kids a decade earlier, being slower and a little more tired than 21. That basically guarantees that your parents are too old to help much and siblings/aunts/uncles are also less capable. You'd think after seeing retards get fleeced on "just put it off and continue "climbing" in your paper pushing bullshit career", people would learn, but I guess not.
 
I don't understand why people do this. It was hard enough having kids a decade earlier, being slower and a little more tired than 21. That basically guarantees that your parents are too old to help much and siblings/aunts/uncles are also less capable. You'd think after seeing retards get fleeced on "just put it off and continue "climbing" in your paper pushing bullshit career", people would learn, but I guess not.

A third of my paycheck disappears due to taxes used to keep junkies,niggers and the scum of society alive.
Let me have that money and I assure you I will have a home and family in a year.

This. Not enough free time, too many legal and cultural hurdles, not enough money. All this leads to less kids, at a later time.
 
The figure also represented a 5.5 per cent fall from 2022’s total of births
That’s a staggeringly quick drop.
I don't understand why people do this. It was hard enough having kids a decade earlier, being slower and a little more tired than 21. That basically guarantees that your parents are too old to help much and siblings/aunts/uncles are also less capable. You'd think after seeing retards get fleeced on "just put it off and continue "climbing" in your paper pushing bullshit career", people would learn, but I guess not.
It’s not ideal, but I can see why it happens.
You go to college because you have to, men aren’t knocking at your door for marriage proposals and you’re smart so you need a job. You get a degree, that’s 21. But everyone’s got a degree so you do a masters or a PhD, now you’re mid twenties. And skint, and at the bottom of the career ladder. You get a job, and rent a room in a flat. Or a flat by yourself. Now you’re 30 with just enough money to rent a tiny place and you’re working too hard to go and meet people. You can’t meet anyone at work because if you eye up that nice chap/girl from accounts you’ll get told off.
But let’s say you do meet someone at 30, you get married, say 31 ish, and save up for a house. That takes a few years , now you’re early thirties. Better have a kid. Kid arrives, daycare is 15-1800 quid a month and more if you work long hours. You can’t afford a second kid until kid one is out of nursery and into school at 5. Now you’re late thirties with maybe, at best, two kids. Do you keep going and pop out another few in your late thirties? A lot don’t they’re too knackered
Or you’re like a LOT of women I know who finally got married (and these are not women sleeping around at all before that gets said) at 30 and try for a baby and nothing happens at all.
The cost of living and the way it’s all so expensive and time consuming is a huge driver of later births. I wish I’d started ten years earlier tbh, but I did manage to have my kids so I’ve done my bit.
More female participation in the workforce will drive rates lower, not higher.
5.5% in a year and a bit. That’s …. Well that’s something going on well past economics IMO
 
You'd think after seeing retards get fleeced on "just put it off and continue "climbing" in your paper pushing bullshit career", people would learn, but I guess not.
Modern "empowered" women think they are somehow beating men and the system by focusing on their careers in male dominated professions. All they have succeeded in doing is becoming as sterile as the mule working the coal mine and just as disposable. They simply became another beast of burden for the system they profess to get their revenge against instead of doing the only unique thing a female can do for their species, which is give birth.

Push it past 40 then you add the risk of getting tard children.
 
I personally don't mind much if births drop as I'm not a fan of line going up permanently, but all the commies and jews pushing third world subhuman slum into our countries have to fuck off.
Right now I feel like having to have births has a bigger push coming from the existential threat to the white race than from countries developing and progressing normally.

Basically, normal upstanding people should be allowed to have children if they want to, not because of "must keep line going up" or "the white race is on its edge". And the multiple reasons mentioned in this thread already just doesn't let that happen.
 
climate change
climate change
concerns over climate change
NO!
This is not why people delay having kids or why people aren't having as many.

I know over a dozen people who stopped at 2 or 3 just because it was too expensive.
The 2 kid and 3 kid couples "would've liked just one more" but literally couldn't afford it.
It was impossible even with mat leave and subsidies.
Couples are delaying having children because of housing instability stress and the exorbitant cost of living.
Shit is absolutely fucked out there.

Stop importing infinity niggers so that bankers, capitalists, and landlords can increase their wealth.
This "infinite growth" mindset is retarded and only benefits rich cunts.

Bring back the guillotine.
It's time for heads to roll.
 
Many people I know would love to have kids but can't because they are struggling financially already. Importing more niggers will only make it worse because those sure as fuck don't work for their money so everyone has to work even harder to feed their useless mouths too. People wait until they can't anymore because of biology, hoping their situation will improve. And many will miss their window. But hey at least there is some pregnant migrant bitch running around with her 7 children, I wonder who's paying for them.

It's not fucking climate change.
 
If you use all of the power of the state and organs of the media to convince a sizeable segment of the population that the planet is on the brink of fiery extinction, don't be surprised if they opt to not have children. People get married and make babies when there's hope for the future. Children are living symbols of that hope. Take it away and everything falls apart.

Elon Musk said in an interview that one of the factors that swayed his decision to move to the right was that many of the uber-rich and powerful people he knew--all of them Leftist--essentially viewed humanity as a kind of disease. To them, we are the problem that needs to be solved; thus, they have actively sought ways to reduce the human population to what they consider acceptable levels.

Climate change is a massive hoax. COVID-19 was developed in a lab in China. Everything you know is wrong.

To be fair I'd you look at prices, especially for raw materials and housing, it's a result of there being far, far too many people
If you look at the 50s the population was much lower and much younger, and people had more space and more money and healthcare wasn't falling apart

We need to get back to population levels and average age around that level and a big part of it is stopping immigration and reducing life expectancy
 
To be fair I'd you look at prices, especially for raw materials and housing, it's a result of there being far, far too many people
If you look at the 50s the population was much lower and much younger, and people had more space and more money and healthcare wasn't falling apart

We need to get back to population levels and average age around that level and a big part of it is stopping immigration and reducing life expectancy

Just what is it with the reduce life expectancy Georgia Guidestone people recently?

Are these idiots unable to get that old people existed even in the middle ages, and average lifespan was lower due to child mortality and wars?
 
Just what is it with the reduce life expectancy Georgia Guidestone people recently?

Are these idiots unable to get that old people existed even in the middle ages, and average lifespan was lower due to child mortality and wars?
Yes but now we have far too many of them and it's choking society. It's like looking at someones skull through a wound and saying ahh don't worry I cut myself shaving the other day

Imagine society is a warehouse, and you fill half of it with broken shit that's no use to anybody
 
Yes but now we have far too many of them and it's choking society. It's like looking at someones skull through a wound and saying ahh don't worry I cut myself shaving the other day

Imagine society is a warehouse, and you fill half of it with broken shit that's no use to anybody

That is just badly managing your resources. For the most of human history, old people had a very valid use.
-advisors for various activities.
-free childcare.
-Common busybody tasks that you can do sitting.

What is choking society is endless immigrants taking jobs meant for young people, and young people being put to meaningless line go up jewestor money schemes, and welfare coloureds, and every job needing 5 degrees, even if a 4 month training period would do the same just fine. Also profits being first, and population welfare... well there is always more niggers if the locals are worked into extinction. Line must go up!

Money has turned from a trading tool to a highly abstract self generating system of numbers. This can be endlessly fucky wuckyd by wall street funny counting, adding another workforce drain on society just to make the (((investors) lines do a random conga on stooonks.

Add onto this Coooonsooooomerism, and artificially short product lifespans.
If all electronics had a 20 to 40 year lifespan, suddenly we wouldn't be short on resources.

Old commie freezers from the 50s still could run today.
 
Back