- Joined
- Mar 16, 2021
I detest WiFi. The home computer should ALWAYS have a right and proper cable to the modem for internet access. No fuss, it simply works.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After I installed a X11 environment on Debian Potato by recursively copying .debs via floppy disk to an old 486 I was perfectly happy with using startx/xinit. If it was good enough for me then it's good enough for everyone else.
I should have a play with that more at some point. Display managers- like screensavers- have always been a bit of a security hole with X, and I'm sure whatever happens with Wayland is even worse. My guess would be that if you're going to have a machine that you walk away from while it's logged into a GUI, your best bet would be something like running startx from a logged in console session inside screen or tmux, detaching that session from the console login and logging out, and then running a relatively low complexity screen locker like i3lock. One probably needs more paranoia (like catching any change to the display screen configuration in XRandR while you're logged out).
Though if you kill the X11 server you get catapulted to the login screen which means that no-one is logged in when the display manager pops up and if someone knows your credentials you are fucked regardless if you use a screensaver or not.I don't know how much this speaks for security, but disabling TTY switching and killing Xorg from a keybinding is recommended for screensavers.
Yeah, if you've started X with startx and that session is still active and connected, you can just switch back to the text virtual console and ctrl-c to kill the X session, or use ctrl-alt-backspace to dump out of the X session and leave you open to do whatever you can from that shell session. I haven't tried starting X from a (subsequently disconnected) screen/tmux yet but I expect that would get around that issue.disabling TTY switching and disabling killing Xorg from a keybinding is recommended for screensavers.
You joke, but if you have been using Linux for a bit and want to get super hardcore about learning the internals, LFS really is really great idea. I build an LFS way back in the early 2000s and used it for almost two semesters. I had a text file filled with all my ./configure flags for each package, and would check FreshMeat (later FreeCode, now gone) for regular updates.Naw, you are making a mistake, you should go install LFS, much simpler, and you'll get a customized, minimal, de-bloated install w/o anyone's bullshit on it.
In terms of difficulty? I guess. But, often that's missing the point. You ought to use what satisfies your needs. There's a lot of weird elitist non-sense around stuff like this that's unnecessary.would it be LFS -> Gentoo -> Arch -> Debian -> Linux Mint?
Not so much on the topic of slock specifically. Just suckless stuff in general.Slock (simple lockscreen, suckless tool) is so basic it requires the group access to be specified in config.h depending on your distribution.
I don't know how much this speaks for security, but disabling TTY switching and disabling killing Xorg from a keybinding is recommended for screensavers.
You joke, but if you have been using Linux for a bit and want to get super hardcore about learning the internals, LFS really is really great idea. I build an LFS way back in the early 2000s and used it for almost two semesters. I had a text file filled with all my ./configure flags for each package, and would check FreshMeat (later FreeCode, now gone) for regular updates.
It made me really appreciate package management. If you ever want to make a super minimalist embedded Linux system, or build your own packaging tool, using and updating an LFS system for a few months is a seriously amazing hardcore deep dive. You will learn so much.
would it be LFS -> Gentoo -> Arch -> Debian -> Linux Mint?
I think LFS is useful in cases where you're a company that makes a very specialised device, so you're targeting specific hardware and usage and will be rolling your own updates that get pushed to customers. I wouldn't be surprised if some smart tvs and other crap runs on something based on LFSLFS could maybe be practical for some use cases. But I haven't made myself do it yet. I was about to at one point but didn't end up going through with it. I can't remember why. But for now I will hold off. But I don't imagine I would actually end up keeping it around after getting it running tbh. Though idk.
I mean... in this day & age the most common way for people to access the internet is via their phone. Desktops are dying I believe? There aren't a lot of great open source Linux distributions for phones too which suck.The home computer should ALWAYS have a right and proper cable to the modem for internet access.
Mobile platforms are 100x worse than desktop ever was when it comes to program lock-in. As in, your user base will hover around the double digits unless you start porting "apps". Android is kind of similar to Linux, but porting anything from there means pulling in their Google-fied Java VM and all the poo code bogging that down.I mean... in this day & age the most common way for people to access the internet is via their phone. Desktops are dying I believe? There aren't a lot of great open source Linux distributions for phones too which suck.
Desktops aren't dying, just phones are getting a lot more poular. But that doesn't cut into desktop's marketshare, given that those are two different classes of device. They may similar, but they are not. A phone can't really run desktop apps easily, and what's the last time you made a call trough the cellular network from your PC?I mean... in this day & age the most common way for people to access the internet is via their phone. Desktops are dying I believe? There aren't a lot of great open source Linux distributions for phones too which suck.
>themI was going to just make fun of them saying this is the least insane tranny (hey this is at least a little better than the Linux distro one they posted).
But then it got to the php part.
Obviously their favorite food is pizza. And the rest made me lol
(Oh and of course they code in rust)
you forget to acknowledge the fact that as phones become more viable and popular, the younger generation has less and less use for a traditional desktop which i believe does end up cutting into the marketshare.Desktops aren't dying, just phones are getting a lot more poular. But that doesn't cut into desktop's marketshare, given that those are two different classes of device. They may similar, but they are not. A phone can't really run desktop apps easily, and what's the last time you made a call trough the cellular network from your PC?
It kinda does... up until you realise that said younger generous are gonna get a laptop/PC eventually.>them
>their
>they
disgusting. you call it what it is or you call it a tranny.
also stop with the reddit spacing
you forget to acknowledge the fact that as phones become more viable and popular, the younger generation has less and less use for a traditional desktop which i believe does end up cutting into the marketshare.
If the motherboard I'm buying has WiFi or Bluetooth integrated, those chips will be desoldered before use. All wireless protocols are optional, no exceptions.I detest WiFi. The home computer should ALWAYS have a right and proper cable to the modem for internet access. No fuss, it simply works.
The "their" was refering to josh. not the tranny. And I don't care enough about autistic pronoun shit on either side to change how I want to say something. Whether its for people here that always want to call man pretending to be a woman a he, or its insane trannies that suicidebait if you call them what they are. Its gay on other side, when I can't just say something how I would naturally say it without someone crying about it.>them
>their
>they
disgusting. you call it what it is or you call it a tranny.
also stop with the reddit spacing
you forget to acknowledge the fact that as phones become more viable and popular, the younger generation has less and less use for a traditional desktop which i believe does end up cutting into the marketshare.
I lhink Dwm had a great philosophical, and design basis, but there were programs likw cwm that did it way better. That's usually the problem with suckless applications. There are just better ways of doing the same thing. Just make something that does one thing, and do it well enough you never have to worry about it again.Dwm. The go to minimal dynamic tiling window manager. The patching which is why I always see people complain about dwm, is part of why I love it so much.
Another reason to not use ZSHThe "their" was refering to josh. not the tranny. And I don't care enough about autistic pronoun shit on either side to change how I want to say something. Whether its for people here that always want to call man pretending to be a woman a he, or its insane trannies that suicidebait if you call them what they are. Its gay on other side, when I can't just say something how I would naturally say it without someone crying about it.
anyway. onto why I'm here. Why the fuck is this what I get when I go to the zsh wiki. Is this really the important information people need to see when going to a wiki for a fucking shell?
god I hate everything now days.
View attachment 6716963
That would be the whole Yocto Project thing. You use it to produce a Linux image with the kernel and init files and stuff in it already setup.I think LFS is useful in cases where you're a company that makes a very specialised device, so you're targeting specific hardware and usage and will be rolling your own updates that get pushed to customers. I wouldn't be surprised if some smart tvs and other crap runs on something based on LFS
It's hard to use software of any kind, open source or not, without running into pozzed shit of some kind or other. FWIW I useAnother reason to not use ZSH
fish
with oh-my-fish
. fish
is written in Rust and there is most likely some sort of faggotry involved somewhere but what can I say? It seems to almost predict what I'm thinking.