It is, and the fact that you made it tells me you must have lived a very cushy life to be so naive. There are a lot of really horrifyingly abusive family members out there, and if you're the wife or child of someone this rich and powerful, it's much harder to get away.
And again, you don't become this kind of CEO without being a sociopath.
You're fantasizing there's a dreadfully abused, terrified family here? Based on? Jfc, I'm one of the louder mouths around here about some men being narcissistic shitheads, but this is quantum leap fantasy.
Is it ghoulish to cheer for the death of the biggest ghoul of them all?
Technically, his boss would be a bigger one.
And no, that's not me agreeing with the premise.
But that initial comment was more about the reaction than it was about the murdered subject of it.
Here's hoping his death insurance doesn't cover murder.
Of course it does, wtf, that's standard. But beyond standard, who would buy life insurance (n.b.: it's called life insurance) for an exec with a company that everyone hates and agree to that exclusion?
One thing I don't think anyone has mentioned is, UHC probably had their own life insurance policy on this guy. Big corporations generally do this, so that if their top executives die suddenly, they can get a payout and have enough cash to recruit a new executive to fill the job, plus a little extra. That's part of why the stock didn't drop, UHC will probably get a big insurance payday on this guy's death, and be able to recruit someone for his job with a generous signing bonus. But of course they won't use ALL of the insurance money for the signing bonus, lol no, why would they do that?
Dude, of course they had key man insurance (someone linked the definition just a page or two ago). But 1) that policy could be $100M or $1B (it's not) and still would be a drop in the bucket, literal rounding error, and 2) there are 50 (probably 500) people already in the organization ready, willing, and able to take that job. Only a couple will be considered, but the decision is already made.
At least as an interim. If they decide that optically "we're making changes" and go outside (it has happened before...even at that very company), they could bring in someone. But short/mid-term it will not be that. And tbqh, they probably have 50,000 passably qualified people who have been flooding every contact they have with outreach today "just maybe."
Tl; dr: they don't need any shekels for "recruiting."