Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
have i mentioned how much i appreciate mr. hardin's snark? because i do. i truly and honestly do.
1733459014446.png
I’ve been thinking for a while now that Russes plan is to try and introduce surprise evidence at trial like you see in movies.
perry-lyzed mason? i'll see myself out.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes but it's Russ and a clearly activist judge. I don't expect sanity, I expect the judge to help him out in outrageous ways some more. If sanity prevailed on either the court or plantiff side I don't think this case would exist at this point..
It's probably not because of any activism on the part of the trial court, it's because the appeals court threw Russ a retarded lifeline and the trial court doesn't want to get reversed twice on the same case.
 
Screenshot 2024-12-06 172247.png
 

Attachments

Still using the Dumont address I see.

I like that Hardin completely ignored that screed of "NEO NAZIS HARASSMENT. EMAILS THAT YOU PUBLISHED. SHATTERED DREAMS." and simply reiterated that he has not complied, almost certainly because this ended up as an exhibit, but he has the patience of a saint to not be even the slightest bit snarky like he used to be. What the fuck does he mean Hardin published the email? Is he still going with Useful_Mistake is Hardin?

Edit: at least footnote 2 called him to the carpet. There's that sweetness I'm looking for.
 
Last edited:
I can feel Hardin's incredulity in this footnote:

"Defendants submit based on information contained in Mr. Greer’s own Complaint that Mr. Greer has been convicted of misdemeanor harassment against a female victim in the state courts of Utah and has been encouraged to seek mental health treatment. ECF No. 3 at ¶146 et seq. It is thus ironic that Mr. Greer purports to fear the harassment of the Defendant, who does not share Mr. Greer’s criminal record or dangerous proclivities"

Hardin likely believes as I do - the only witness Russ has is a family member who will reiterate his plights which have nothing to do with copyright infringement.
 
Btw, idk how protective orders work, does it mean that they can't publish the info? Wouldn't that also apply to Null right now?

A protective order against Null to not harass or publish harassing information about Greer would have nothing to do with anyone else publishing publicly available court records, such as a filing with witness names. Any further discussion might give Russtard ideas, when really he should be focusing on getting enough money for his next hooker date to clear his mind for banging out his next response on his iPhone.
 
Back