I'm not saying anything about female-driven sexual selection. I'm saying that if you don't reproduce, and your competitors do, your genes lose the battle for the future.
What fucking future is this, then?
I tend to agree with almost everything else you say, but not this. The notion that a man must successfully blow his beans into some shitcunt’s muff, just to say ‘uh, huh, I’ve staked my claim to the future of humankind huh’… it’s outdated.
So let’s say a man gets his cunt pregnant. She gets bored of him in months. Leaves with the kid. Fleeces him to the point of bankruptcy and takes half his shit in the name of alimony. His kid is turned against him for 5 of the 7 days a week in which the man has no visitation. She remarries, brings the kid up with a new, richer provider and the father is virtually written out of existence. The kid gets indoctrinated with all kinds of liberal evil and ends up hating his/her dad anyways.
As for the father, no money, no family, no soul and no hope; but he’s a ‘winner’ because he’s procreated a being into existence with the same genetic code as him into the world. I’m sure that will fully console him as he wanks himself dry in a bedsit wankshack for the rest of his days.
Winner is he? Why, because some people hold the archaic belief that procreation affords some mythical importance? What tangible benefit is there to procreating other than ‘it cements your line’? Can you give me anything other than that as a reason?
The idea of ‘beating your non-procreating competitors’ admittedly carried significant weight in 1684, or if you happen to be a lion, panther or a tribesman in a remote African shithole.
Right now, in modern 2024, it is fucking irrelevant.