Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

There are in fact young women who expect a Pet Faggot and want gay bars to be places for them to status-signal, and these women get incensed when fags don't pay attention to them and play shopping buddy like they saw on the TV. But it is clear that @The Crack Spiders Bitch is not one of those.
Even if I was desperate for a diseased lispy pet and wanted to spend my youth "yasss kweening" instead of focused on getting married/having children, it doesn't mean that any straight man should tolerate them.

Homos don't want straight men to succeed either.
 
I’m sure there’s a fag hate thread you guys could post in, instead of saying it here.

I hate that women gave gay men legitimacy. Why is there any public institution acknowledging someone’s love for same sex ass? Because women insisted they should.
 
I’m sure there’s a fag hate thread you guys could post in, instead of saying it here.

I hate that women gave gay men legitimacy. Why is there any public institution acknowledging someone’s love for same sex ass? Because women insisted they should.

Under le ebul Christian patriarchy, we ruthlessly suppressed fags. The basic problem with giving women any power over society's threat-management apparatus (the police, the military, etc) is that they're extremely prone to the argument, "But look at this predator's big, sad eyes! We should let him in near the children!" They have proven over and over to lack the emotional fortitude to apply necessary ruthlessness to external threats.

Homos don't want straight men to succeed either.

All homosexuals want is to suck cock and get fucked in the ass. When you tolerate homosexuals in your organization, your organization will eventually be subverted as the homosexuals use it to facilitate ass-fucking and cock-sucking.

It's really not a "gay thing" as much as it's a "male sex drive" thing. If women were as horny as men, co-ed workspaces would be even less productive than they are due to all the fucking. Look at what happens in the military when fit, buff, horny young women are around fit, buff, horny young men.
 
What value do gay men add to society? Gay men decorate better than women.
As someone with no dog in this fight, that’s what’s known in the trade as a ‘reach’.

Don’t get me wrong, the whore you are arguing with sounds like a veritable shitcunt. However, gay men ‘adding value’ to society by being better decorators and having a bit more disposable income hardly offsets the £billions in healthcare for HIV-treatments, drugs, and all the other anal/genital afflictions caused by indiscriminate shirt-lifting.
 
It's almost like being a dysgenic tard with a lot of self-assurance is a lot less hurtful to your social/romantic prospects than being a cynical neurotic who spends their time obsessing over all the ways they/others aren't acceptable or adequate
This is true, incels get a bit too blackpilled and bitter about women.
That's pretty pathetic, dudebros. Have you tried consulting your close ones for free and without being at risk of receiving poor advice in bad faith instead?
Imagine paying 40 dollars an hour to a fucking woman with a degree because your brain, which was built to hunt and fuck, doesn't like living in a society where it isn't allowed to hunt and fuck. Lift weights. Say nigger. Your brain will love you for it.
 
This is true, incels get a bit too blackpilled and bitter about women.
Maybe some mental illnesses help you get over the fact you got extorted into shoving your own Sonichu medaillon into your rectum while recorded. That can't be expected from a normal guy. But hey, evolution is a series of birth defects. The Chris-Chan autist may just replace the ordinary human in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pedophobe
Maybe some mental illnesses help you get over the fact you got extorted into shoving your own Sonichu medaillon into your rectum while recorded. That can't be expected from a normal guy. But hey, evolution is a series of birth defects. The Chris-Chan autist may just replace the ordinary human in the future.
It's really not that profound that lunatics reproduce in an increasingly deranged society.
This is like saying you succeeded at life because you knocked up a whore
 
Countless other species say otherwise.
You mean like the Irish Elk, that went extinct because the females were so obsessed with larger antlers that they prevented the males from being able to survive?
Modern society is basically experiencing our own version of runaway selection, where features that are objectively worse for survival are promoted due to female sexual preference.
1733507912406.png

If it were up to women's sexual selection alone, every man would eventually be a 7'9" shredded dark-triad troglodyte that responds to most stimuli with extreme violence, before dying at the ripe old age of 26 due to circulatory issues.
 
You mean like the Irish Elk, that went extinct because the females were so obsessed with larger antlers that they prevented the males from being able to survive?
Modern society is basically experiencing our own version of runaway selection, where features that are objectively worse for survival are promoted due to female sexual preference.
View attachment 6722463
If it were up to women's sexual selection alone, every man would eventually be a 7'9" shredded dark-triad troglodyte that responds to most stimuli with extreme violence, before dying at the ripe old age of 26 due to circulatory issues.

I'm not saying anything about female-driven sexual selection. I'm saying that if you don't reproduce, and your competitors do, your genes lose the battle for the future. It's a basic tautology that many sour grapes misogynists on the right refuse to admit. They have a million reasons not to reproduce. All of them are retarded. "It's a good thing that whites stopped having children while niggers and pajeets didn't because..." shut up, there is no reason this is okay.
 
You mean like the Irish Elk, that went extinct because the females were so obsessed with larger antlers that they prevented the males from being able to survive?
Modern society is basically experiencing our own version of runaway selection, where features that are objectively worse for survival are promoted due to female sexual preference.
View attachment 6722463
If it were up to women's sexual selection alone, every man would eventually be a 7'9" shredded dark-triad troglodyte that responds to most stimuli with extreme violence, before dying at the ripe old age of 26 due to circulatory issues.
This thread always informs me of new and innovative ways to hate women.
 
I'm not saying anything about female-driven sexual selection. I'm saying that if you don't reproduce, and your competitors do, your genes lose the battle for the future. It's a basic tautology that many sour grapes misogynists on the right refuse to admit. They have a million reasons not to reproduce. All of them are retarded. "It's a good thing that whites stopped having children while niggers and pajeets didn't because..." shut up, there is no reason this is okay.
It's an old canard, but right wing dudes are the only group that will genuinely sit there, watching everything get objectively worse and worse and go 'ha, yeah, this is a good thing!' because they've psyopped themselves into it. Madness.
 
I'm not saying anything about female-driven sexual selection. I'm saying that if you don't reproduce, and your competitors do, your genes lose the battle for the future. It's a basic tautology that many sour grapes misogynists on the right refuse to admit. They have a million reasons not to reproduce. All of them are retarded. "It's a good thing that whites stopped having children while niggers and pajeets didn't because..." shut up, there is no reason this is okay.
You convince no one because nothing in your argument speaks to the instinctual level of people. Nothing inside a men triggers when thinking about the survival of their "genes" and nobody makes decision about their future on a pure rational level that isn't motivated by at least some emotion. "Have kids for the future of your country" is a better argument than what you are constantly try to pull of, because at least it speaks to the tribal instinct people have.
 
I'm not saying anything about female-driven sexual selection. I'm saying that if you don't reproduce, and your competitors do, your genes lose the battle for the future. It's a basic tautology that many sour grapes misogynists on the right refuse to admit. They have a million reasons not to reproduce. All of them are retarded. "It's a good thing that whites stopped having children while niggers and pajeets didn't because..." shut up, there is no reason this is okay.
By this definition Henrietta Lacks is the most virile human to have ever lived.
 
I'm not saying anything about female-driven sexual selection. I'm saying that if you don't reproduce, and your competitors do, your genes lose the battle for the future.
What fucking future is this, then?

I tend to agree with almost everything else you say, but not this. The notion that a man must successfully blow his beans into some shitcunt’s muff, just to say ‘uh, huh, I’ve staked my claim to the future of humankind huh’… it’s outdated.

So let’s say a man gets his cunt pregnant. She gets bored of him in months. Leaves with the kid. Fleeces him to the point of bankruptcy and takes half his shit in the name of alimony. His kid is turned against him for 5 of the 7 days a week in which the man has no visitation. She remarries, brings the kid up with a new, richer provider and the father is virtually written out of existence. The kid gets indoctrinated with all kinds of liberal evil and ends up hating his/her dad anyways.

As for the father, no money, no family, no soul and no hope; but he’s a ‘winner’ because he’s procreated a being into existence with the same genetic code as him into the world. I’m sure that will fully console him as he wanks himself dry in a bedsit wankshack for the rest of his days.

Winner is he? Why, because some people hold the archaic belief that procreation affords some mythical importance? What tangible benefit is there to procreating other than ‘it cements your line’? Can you give me anything other than that as a reason?

The idea of ‘beating your non-procreating competitors’ admittedly carried significant weight in 1684, or if you happen to be a lion, panther or a tribesman in a remote African shithole.

Right now, in modern 2024, it is fucking irrelevant.
 
You're full of hatred for every man in existence, so I don't know what to tell you about that.
Well in a way it's true she is. Gay man do women things like cooking, cleaning better than actual women and with less complaints and women hate competition. They are also beneficial to the state as they are perfect work slave. No kids to spend money on and aren't a drain on healthcare. Women are a total drain on society and social systems, just slightly better than immigrants.

If it were up to women's sexual selection alone, every man would eventually be a 7'9" shredded dark-triad troglodyte that responds to most stimuli with extreme violence, before dying at the ripe old age of 26 due to circulatory issues.
Ironically, that happens with farm animals that are bred for meat. Their heart can't cope with pumping blood to all the muscles and they just have a heart attack and die.
 
Right now, in modern 2024, it is fucking irrelevant.
Nobody's forcing you to marry and breed.
Feel free to cope and seethe until you die alone in your nursing home when Muhammed beats you to death.

On behalf of every single woman on the planet, lol we don't care.
Don't get married. I can't imagine how torturous that would be for that poor woman listening to you whine all day.

Any men listening to your crying about how having sex with women is pointless is also a huge faggot.
Women are a total drain on society and social systems, just slightly better than immigrants.
"Faggots are better than women"
Well, I can see you and @Polystyrene Glioblastoma will have a happy future together.

I wish you the best of luck.
Stay away from children, you nonces.
 
Feel free to cope and seethe until you die alone in your nursing home when Muhammed beats you to death.
He's not a woman,
Women and residents with dementia are more likely to be victims of sexual abuse. Women comprise nearly two-thirds (65.6%) of the nursing home population.
Woman also get abandoned way more if they develop cancer or some other serious illnesses while in marriage.
A study published in November 2009 by the journal Cancer shows that faced with a cancer diagnosis, a woman is six times more likely to experience a break-up than a man in the same situation.

"Femcel sperging and crying"
At least try to argue.
 
Back