Ukrainian Defensive War against the Russian Invasion - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

Don't forget Bobby pins as radiation renders locks vulnerable to a flat screwdriver and bent Bobby pin
Pfft, clearly the radiation makes them more secure since it makes them harder to touch/handle. They're vulnerable to bobby pins and screwdrivers because they're built like shit by penny pinching corner cutting kikes like Master Lock.
 
Don't forget Bobby pins as radiation renders locks vulnerable to a flat screwdriver and bent Bobby pin
TBH there's a lock picking tool known as a rake that's not much different from a bobby pin in shape. Rake the lock pins with the bobby pin and carefully twist with the screwdriver and you're in. You can also use the other end as a standard pick if you have something to apply tension and keep the pin in place.
1733426864070.png1733427172267.png
Yeah, its not very realistic but it is plausible, at least as far as video game logic is concerned.

That said since I'd not be worried about keeping my infiltration quiet or the lock intact a good solid hammer and a few wedges to just bust the lock open would serve better than a pick.
 
Going to cross-post this here, since some parts are (laughably) relevent.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/can...hundreds-of-new-models-and-variants-1.7135321
Archive

The Canadian government is expanding its list of banned firearms, adding hundreds of additional makes, models and their variants, effective immediately.

Lawful owners of these newly prohibited firearms will be granted amnesty from criminal liability, with strict conditions, while they take the steps required to comply, ahead of disposing of their firearms through the still-yet-to-be-implemented buyback program.
Blair also revealed that federal government is in talks with Ukrainian officials about shipping the firearms the government eventually intends to collect, to assist in Ukraine's war effort.

"We've been working very closely with our friends in Ukraine to ensure that weapons that were intended to be used in combat, could be made available to them," Blair said.

"The Department of National Defence will begin working with the Canadian companies that have weapons that Ukraine needs and which are already eligible for the assault-style firearm compensation program, in order to get these weapons out of Canada, and into the hands of the Ukrainians."

The liberal government of Canada has announced another (most likely ineffectual) gun ban, where they announce the aim of disarming Canadian citizens, stripping them of their property, and sending it to Ukraine. On the face of it a bad look, since, as you might guess, 'Ukraine' has become a curse-word pretty much overnight among Canadian gun-owners. Even worse, since on a practical level, this is totally comedic. None of the rifles in question are suitable for modern combat. Most are of extremely low-quality civilian build, infamous for their unreliability, and the others are .22LR models (LOL). Not to mention that they are chambered in many different calibres. Just an absolute fucking farce on every level.

To give you an idea of the kind of stuff we're talking about, consider the Wk180 and M10x. Never heard of them? Exactly, because they're utter shit sold for aesthetics only, and about as useful on the battlefield as a paper bag filled with dog vomit.

eh.png
 
Last edited:
I'm hoarding 5.45 rounds for use in the nearby subway line as currency.
This is a
The real apocalypse proof savings is rounds with solid-gold bullets. Either the gold is valuable, or you can shoot motherfuckers.
(Yes I get the reference)

I've started gathering butter knives.

Hold on, there's a crowd of police outside. They saw me mention the forbidden implement. Guess I'm done for, lads.
Oi m8 let me see that toast butterin' loisense.

The liberal government of Canada has announced another (most likely ineffectual) gun ban, where they announce the aim of disarming Canadian citizens, stripping them of their property, and sending it to Ukraine. On the face of it a bad look, since, as you might guess, 'Ukraine' has become a curse-word pretty much overnight among Canadian gun-owners. Even worse, since on a practical level, this is totally comedic. None of the rifles in question are suitable for modern combat. Most are of extremely low-quality civilian build, infamous for their unreliability, and the others are .22LR models (LOL). Not to mention that they are chambered in many different calibres. Just an absolute fucking farce on every level.
Jesus christ this would be hilarious if it wasn't so infuriating.
 
Holy fuck, this retard officially hit the rock bottom

View attachment 6720568
If he isn't called out by everyone for laundering Kremlin propaganda, then I'm really going to lose whatever faith in humanity I have left
they won't bother because at the end of the day, unfortunately, being a retard is not illegal and the magatards have to suck his his lil Tuck becaue he's based or something.
 
The liberal government of Canada has announced another (most likely ineffectual) gun ban, where they announce the aim of disarming Canadian citizens, stripping them of their property, and sending it to Ukraine. On the face of it a bad look, since, as you might guess, 'Ukraine' has become a curse-word pretty much overnight among Canadian gun-owners.
If I didn't have low expectations of Canadian liberals beforehand, this is so bad I'd almost be inclined to believe its a 4D Russian PSYOP...
 
If I didn't have low expectations of Canadian liberals beforehand, this is so bad I'd almost be inclined to believe its a 4D Russian PSYOP...
Canada has been just constantly dropping the ball when it comes to this whole ordeal. Canada has a very proud Ukrainian diaspora that is probably one of the few White communities in the country that still have their own identity. The media quickly turned on an old man because he served in the SS at the age of 16 (I wonder why a very young Ukrainian boy would take his chances against the oh so nice soviets.) Our biggest contribution to the effort from the government was deactivated FFARs from the 70s and now for other reason than to look like a retard, our government wants to strip civilians of their semi-automatic rifles and send a shipment of mixed platforms, that 100% don't fit into a supply chain with parts, calibers and only signals how out of touch the Liberal Party is both domestically and internationally.
 
Ukrainian drone nets a Russian drone, just after it drops a WP grenade:


And to absolutely no one's surprise, they're trying to recruit Syrian "volunteers" for the SMO:


A Ukrainian droneboat attack on a Crimean bridge from last year:
 
Last edited:
Holy fuck, this retard officially hit the rock bottom

View attachment 6720568
If he isn't called out by everyone for laundering Kremlin propaganda, then I'm really going to lose whatever faith in humanity I have left

Hats off to the Kremlin for continuing to win the propaganda/cyber war. They’ve managed to buy some of the most influential retards in America and have pushed most working class republicans into thinking that the military aid goes directly to Ukraine, and not 90% of it going into the military industrial complex providing further jobs and growth.

Same thing happened with Brexit, buses that said “£250 million goes towards the EU” (something along those lines) and then when brexit happened, well.. just look where we are now lol.

They take advantage of people who are suffering and want to see real change and improvement, who find it hard to afford groceries (you can’t blame them). But oppositions and legislations against this has always been weak and never countered those claims and then reinforces it.

It’s like all the Russian espionage in the UK/Europe, we never do anything because the main argument being “Let’s not retaliate to avoid further escalation “ in what world does this make any fucking sense?

A very minor but appropriate example of this is when you’re in the playground and the bully keeps picking on you, they know you won’t do anything, they sense your fear, they know you wont tell the teacher, or retaliate, so they keep poking and attacking you.

At what point do we collectively just say, “enough is enough”? Because playing defence is certainly not a winning strategy anymore.

Currently the UK had experienced major signal and communication issues in our trainlines, could be malicious but I know our government will never admit it was Russia due to “escalation”.
 
Lavrov droned on with familiar Kremlin talking points for 80 minutes, so there's not a lot worth summarizing. A few takeaways:
  • Tucker started by outright feeding him the line that the American military is firing ATACMS into Russia. This is Putin's familiar argument that the Ukrainians don't know how to fire missiles that far so the Americans must be doing it. Tucker also said this in his video announcing the interview.
  • However, Lavrov backed off from any claim that that means America and Russia are actually at war. He said it was only a hybrid war. He said Russia respects America and wants a good relationship (but...).
  • He said Ukraine had spent years oppressing ethnic Russians, trying to destroy their language, culture, and (Tucker loves this) religion. Russia had to act to protect them. He said UN principles on respecting borders have an exception if people's human rights are being denied, so Russia is actually acting within international law.
  • Lavrov seemed to hint that Bucha was fake. He said the western media blew up the story but then Ukraine dropped it when it wasn't politically useful. He said Russia asked for names of people supposedly massacred and was never provided it, the implication being it never happened. (There is in fact a memorial in Bucha with names of the victims.)
  • He repeated the refrain that a peace was basically worked out in Istanbul, before Boris Johnson appeared and ordered Ukraine (on what authority?) to fight Russia instead. (The details of the plan have leaked and amounted to surrendering Ukraine's sovereignty to Russia.)
  • Tucker feeds Lavrov possible conspiracy theories on why BoJo would do this (Biden ordered him to?), but Lavrov says he doesn't know and won't try to answer.
  • Tucker wants him to say that America and Russsia have no back-channel communication. But Lavrov repeatedly contradicts him, saying there are contacts on urgent matters, for example warning about the Oreshnik strike so there would be no mistakes.
  • They talked about Navalny but it was all over the map. Lavrov seemed to hint that Navalny was poisoned in Germany. I had trouble following the bizarre allegations.
  • There was a lot of chatter about the risk of nuclear escalation. Lavrov said he hears politicians saying Russia has no red lines because they keep getting crossed and nothing happens, but that it would be a mistake to think that. However, I didn't catch any elaboration on how this makes sense.
  • Tucker did ask how many Russians had died in the war. Lavrov said that's classified.
  • There was the usual about respecting Russia's legitimate security interests and the expansion of NATO. Nothing we haven't heard before.
  • Overall, Tucker challenged him on almost no points and acted as a sounding board, nodding along and agreeing verbally every now and then. Lavrov talked almost the whole time so Tucker barely needed to be in the room.
Lavrov is a veteran diplomat, and I sometimes wonder if he even believes what he's saying or he is just doing his job, like an actor reading lines.
 
If he isn't called out by everyone for laundering Kremlin propaganda, then I'm really going to lose whatever faith in humanity I have left
About that...
8777.png
From the youtube comments.


Lavrov is a veteran diplomat, and I sometimes wonder if he even believes what he's saying or he is just doing his job, like an actor reading lines.
He used to be highly respected, and according to people who knew him, extremely intelligent and well read.
Such things are of no use to the Russian diplomatic service though.


Moving two S-400 SAM launchers.

Following them is a bus with flashing lights and the words "CHILDREN" written on it. But there are no children in it.

It is quite possible that it could be used to transport the SAM crew.

link
 
gathering butter knives.
A Starmer hating hatethinker. Only blacks and Pakis are allowed knives. You're done for sonny boy.
Lavrov is a veteran diplomat, and I sometimes wonder if he even believes what he's saying or he is just doing his job, like an actor reading lines.
Honestly, Tucker is now unfailing shitfilled, even going a bit too far for Lavrov. Homeless man ranting seems to be Medvedev's job. Lavrov would likely prefer Putin be a bit less risk taking with his dictatoring (likely wants a retirement snoring in the Senate and in his dacha and perhaps all of Syria is a better prize than some fragments of Ukraine). Probably more of an actor doing his job. Tucker claimed the US Embassy in Kyiv banned his interview with Zelensky, but likely Zelensky wouldn't have seen the point. Given how the moderately okay Sky News distorted his words on NATO, who knows what someone so reliably dishonest as Tucker would do?
 
20241206_113513.jpg

Blyat Russia didn’t NEED those airbases and that naval base in Syria. Who cares about possible expansions into the Red Sea? Russia also didn’t NEED the largest logistical and supply hub for its forces in Libya and Africa. The troops in Syria can be used in meat waves in Ukraine instead xaxa! )))
 
He said UN principles on respecting borders have an exception if people's human rights are being denied
So when is the invasion of Russia? It's well overdue, if that's the standard.

Lavrov is a despicable piece of shit, even if he was a respectful diplomat at some point, he sold his soul to the devil and bears responsibility for all that's happening.
For some reason it keeps surprising me just how blatantly Tucker is sucking up to all these Kremlin stooges. He's being so dramatic about his "groundbreaking journalistic work", but in the end he does fucking nothing other than expose Americans to bullshit Kremlin-controlled media (meaning Russian media in general, there's no distinction) been feeding to Russian population for years.
It would be trivial to destroy Lavrov on every point here with legitimate facts, but that's not why Tucker is there. Why is he there? Paycheck? Mental illness?

About that...
8777.png
There's no guarantee these are even real, to be honest. Kremlin employs immense propaganda machine, boosting paid comments is one of their specialties.
It's always funny to see Russians pretend like they don't see USA as an enemy, when all they do is seethe about it.
Putin's approach to America is adversarial, there's no two ways about it. Media has been antagonizing America on his behalf for over a decade now, first to justify destruction of opposition and cracking down on dissent (everyone inconvenient to the regime is designated a "foreign agent", which always means America btw), and then to invade Ukraine in order to combat supposed NATO encroachment (once again, meaning America, because US is always portrayed as a puppet master of the entire western world) among other things.

All vatniks posses deeply-rooted inferiority complex toward America, which makes it impossible for them to see the latter in a favorable light. Only fifth-columnists like Tucker here get a pass, because this groveling appeals to them.
It makes them feel equal, and fuels their delusion of being feared and respected. Unless it actually comes to blows, they can continue to entertain the idea that Russia would totally own US, replaying TV presentations of Russian nukes flying toward western countries and reaching their targets as they cream their pants.
Your daily reminder that we're approaching 3rd full year of Russia's attempt to defeat Ukraine.

This whole "Well, actually, I totally wasn't fighting you for real! How could I?! We're buddies!" act is merely an attempt to save face. One doesn't simply get to talk all this shit for years and then just take it back as if nothing happened.
While vatniks might genuinely believe in their delusions, people in Kremlin know that USA is a powerhouse they can't contend with. This whole campaign to erode political will of the West to support Ukraine, America in particular as de-facto world leader, is for that very reason.
They know it would be impossible to freeze the conflict, let alone conquer Ukraine at the rate it's been going. They want to make use of the fatigue that built up in western societies to strong-arm Ukraine into accepting unfavorable terms. It's scummy, but smart, mostly because western politicians are retarded fucking pussies who can't see past their own nose.
Propaganda is Kremlin's sharpest weapon, it has been honed by USSR and passed down to kleptocratic regime that rules Russia today. Having no shame or principles has its strengths, as Machiavelli would attest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Tucker started by outright feeding him the line that the American military is firing ATACMS into Russia. This is Putin's familiar argument that the Ukrainians don't know how to fire missiles that far so the Americans must be doing it. Tucker also said this in his video announcing the interview.

Thank you, fren, for reporting back on this clownshow for the rest of us. I did see the part in the preview video where Tucker talked about Americans firing into Russian territory and wondered what the fuck he was on about. His logic really is that there's something super complicated about the ATACMS system that the bumkin Ukrainians, who can fly MiGs and operate S-300s and developed a homegrown attack drone industry practically overnight, are just too stupid to figure out? Holy shit, has this guy had a head injury or something?

From your summary it sounds like there were places where Lavrov himself had to reel in Tucker's retardation. Like of course there are still communication channels between Russia and the US, holy shit. Those things almost never disappear completely even when countries are at hot war with each other, even if they have to use an intermediary third party, because both sides are still going to want to arrange prisoner exchanges, propose ceasefires, and all the other sorts of things that countries at war do with each other. Wonder how Tucker got that idea - I'm sure the logic is just as simplistic and dumb as the above.

Just like Coach Red Pill and MTG, the war really has turned this once semi-respectable guy into a full retard, and one has to wonder if some sort of change happened to them, or if they were a retard all along, cleverly concealed under a thin veneer of respectability and sensibility that fooled all of us - well, fooled me at least.
 
Back