US Bronze Stars, like those Hegseth earned, are common among military officers - Supporters point to his wartime decorations in declaring him qualified to lead the Defense Department. Military experts say that doing so distorts those medals’ significance.

By Alex Horton
December 5, 2024 at 7:58 p.m. EST

1733493991111.png
Pete Hegseth departs a meeting at the Capitol on Wednesday. (Matt McClain/The Washington Post)

When President-elect Donald Trump named television personality Pete Hegseth as his choice to lead the Defense Department, his announcement cited the Army veteran’s two Bronze Stars atop his military credentials.

Hegseth’s supporters, including the president-elect, have invoked those awards — received for wartime service in Iraq and Afghanistan — repeatedly in making the case for his qualifications to lead the U.S. military, even as allegations of sexual misconduct, excessive alcohol use and financial mismanagement threaten to derail his nomination.

“You want someone there, leading the DOD, who has served in combat, who knows what it’s like to be shot at,” Trump adviser Jason Miller told Fox News this week, touting the 44-year-old former National Guardsman’s Bronze Stars and his Ivy League education.

Military experts say there is a mistaken belief among much of the American public that the Bronze Star is a rarefied award exclusively for battlefield heroics, which has distorted and inflated its significance in many cases. The U.S. military issues two versions of the award: one with a “V” device denoting valor in combat, and the other for commendable job performance on deployments, or “meritorious service” in military parlance.

The Bronze Stars listed in Hegseth’s official records fall into the latter category, according to his official service records. Such awards were issued somewhat liberally throughout the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, experts say. Awardees of the meritorious service medal are predominantly military officers like Hegseth, data provided by the military shows. While many officers have risked their lives on the battlefield, the majority of fighting and exposure to danger is performed by the enlisted troops they command.

Hegseth also received a Combat Infantryman Badge, which is awarded when infantry soldiers and officers engage an enemy in combat.

For many military officers who serve in war zones, Bronze Stars are akin to a pass or fail, said Jason Dempsey, a former Army officer who served in Iraq and Afghanistan and is now a leader in civilian-military relations.

“The expectation is you’re getting one, unless you mess up,” said Dempsey, who also has two Bronze Stars dating to his wartime deployments. “It sounds exotic,” he added, “but unfortunately people don’t realize, more often than not, it’s something fairly routine and bureaucratic.”

Members of the enlisted corps have characterized the medal for meritorious service as a “participation trophy” for officers who do what is expected of them. Enlisted leaders, who can submit award recommendations for subordinates, have long complained about the difficulty of recognizing junior troops with awards. They point to the military’s officer-driven culture and a prevailing belief that rank-and-file personnel rate more limited recognition for their performance outside of extraordinary acts of selflessness.

Hegseth could not be reached for comment. As his professional record and personal conduct have faced scrutiny, he has denied the claims leveled against him and remained defiant, telling Megyn Kelly in an interview this week, “There’s no reason to back down.”

A spokeswoman for the Trump transition team, Karoline Leavitt, attacked The Washington Post’s reporting, calling it an attempt to “smear” Trump’s cabinet picks and “minimize the honorable service of Pete Hegseth.”

“This,” she said, “is another disgusting story.”

1733494026712.png
A copy of the Bronze Star certificate awarded to then-1st. Lt. Pete Hegseth for meritorious service in Iraq. (National Guard Bureau)

To his supporters, the Princeton- and Harvard-educated Hegseth is a disrupter perfectly suited to upend an institution that many Trump-aligned conservatives have maligned for having lost its focus on fighting and winning wars.

A former Fox News host whose pointed views on military affairs first attracted Trump’s interest years ago, Hegseth served in several National Guard units during his career. He left the service in 2021, after being turned away from an assignment to protect the U.S. Capitol in the wake of Trump’s 2020 election defeat and the violent effort by his supporters to reverse the outcome.

Though Hegseth has forcefully denied the assertions, his tattoos drew scrutiny among fellow service members for their similarity to certain white nationalist imagery, and a D.C. Guard soldier overseeing security questioned whether he could be an “insider threat.”

The citation for Hegseth’s first Bronze Star, received in 2006, states he “contributed immeasurably to the success of building a free and democratic nation for the citizens of Iraq.” He was attached then to an active-duty unit operating in the restive city of Samarra and was recognized for work as a platoon leader and a civil affairs officer. He has recounted a close call in Iraq when a rocket-propelled grenade struck his vehicle but did not explode, describing the event as traumatic. The unit he supported was rocked by a war crimes scandal after he left, and though he did not take part in it, those events did color his sympathy for troops involved in similar incidents.

His citation for the second award cites his work as a counterinsurgency instructor in Afghanistan in 2012. He wrote in his book “The War on Warriors,” published this year, that he pulled “bodies out of burning vehicles” there.

Neither of Hegseth’s Bronze Star citation mentions combat exploits specifically. And while Trump has implied that, writing in a social media post Nov. 13 that his nominee for defense secretary received two Bronze Stars for “his actions on the battlefield,” there is no record of Hegseth himself having inflated or embellished the awards’ significance.

In both cases, the Bronze Stars he received were awarded within a month of Hegseth’s tours ending, his service record shows. It’s a common circumstance to recognize efforts during a deployment rather than a specific action or moment, military experts said.

1733494052366.png
Pete Hegseth with the mayor of Samarra, Iraq, Manmood Kalaf Ahmed, in 2005. (Sgt. Waine Haley/U.S. Army)

Award data provided to The Post by the U.S. military offers a glimpse into how the Bronze Star was typically distributed during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. In the Air Force, officers make up roughly 20 percent of the service but received 58 percent of meritorious Bronze Star medals awarded after the 9/11 attacks, its figures show. With Bronze Star medals earned for combat valor, the dynamic is reversed, with Air Force officers accounting for 12 percent of those awards, data shows.

Marine Corps data showed a similar trend, with 65 percent of meritorious Bronze Stars awarded since 2008 going to officers, who now make up about 12 percent of the force.
Spokespeople for the Army and Navy did not provide comparable data ahead of this report’s publication.

Overall, Hegseth’s record suggests he was a proficient at his job and met the Army’s rigorous expectations of infantry officers.

A Post review of his awards show some are consistent with legions of military personnel whose service coincided with the response to 9/11. Another decoration he received, the National Defense Service Medal, was given to service members after completing 90 days of service between 2001 and 2022, making it an award most troops earned before they finished boot camp. Iraq and Afghanistan campaign medals, which Hegseth also received, were awarded to those who deployed to or supported operations in those regions. His Expert Infantryman Badge was awarded following a test of fundamental combat skills, part of the rite of passage for Army infantrymen that not all receive.

1733494072083.png
A copy of the Bronze Star certificate awarded to then-Capt. Pete Hegseth for service in Afghanistan. (National Guard Bureau)

Military experts say the American public’s misunderstanding of what such awards signify — and what they don’t — is rooted in the gulf that exists between the comparatively few who serve in uniform and everyone else.

The military does not offer bonuses or other perks for job performance, making awards the principal means by which commanders recognize their subordinates, said Dempsey, who heads Columbia University’s Center for Veteran Transition and Integration. Awards are distributed based on rank and responsibilities, he noted, with officers and some senior enlisted troops receiving a large volume of Bronze Stars specifically in the 20 years of war following 9/11.

So this saturation, coupled with the public’s propensity to lionize those who have a Bronze Star, has led many Americans to overestimate its rarity, Dempsey said. “It reflects the cheapness of the discourse around the military when people grab for these exotic-sounding terms that they don’t understand,” he added.

Conjecture over the Bronze Star as a signifier of competence and experience has played out elsewhere in American politics — on both sides of the political aisle.

Rep. Troy E. Nehls (R-Texas), responding to claims this year that his military records showed only one of his two Bronze Stars, posted both of his citations online to prove he earned them while serving as an Army officer. One commended him for duties that included procuring office furniture. The other broadly described good performance over the course of a deployment.

Nehls also drew scrutiny for wearing a lapel pin signifying the Army’s Combat Infantryman Badge, despite not qualifying for the recognition.

Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D), who served in a military police role as an officer in the Army Reserve, apologized this year for what he called the “honest mistake” of listing a Bronze Star he did not receive among his accomplishments in his 2006 application for a White House fellowship. Moore claimed a superior officer in the Army encouraged him to include the award in his application materials because he assumed it would be approved.

Veterans turned politicians, as well as their supporters, have incentive to leverage the public’s limited understanding of the military and its award system, said Katherine L. Kuzminski, a military policy expert at the Center for a New American Security. She noted that former service members often receive deference in American society, and that can become a concern when the job at hand may exceed what their military experience says about their professional qualifications.

Bronze Stars and other awards, Kuzminski said, “signal credibility that may not actually carry into other areas.”

With Hegseth’s Senate confirmation facing uncertainty, Trump is said to be considering others for the role. Among them is Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), whose credentials include the oversight of thousands of National Guard forces in his state.

DeSantis served as an officer in the Navy Reserve. He also is a recipient of the Bronze Star for meritorious service.

Alex Horton is a national security reporter for The Washington Post focused on the U.S. military. He served in Iraq as an Army infantryman

Source (Archive)
 
WaPo chickenhawks dickride POG fobbits like Pete Buttplug, but downplay the valor of real shit-kickers for being chuds.

Hegseth wrote an entire book on how the real warriors are treated like shit while Emma and Her Two Moms get all the glory. They know he's right, and cannot allow him to unfuck their social engineering.
Exactly.

That said, Bronze Stars are given out like candy these days, especially ones without the "V" for Valour device

Now a Silver Star is still a VERY legit medal as is the DSC, Flying Cross and Purple Heart and of course the CMOH
 
Do not insult me. Further insults will result in me rating your posts MATI again.
Do it, faggot.

I live in the real world, not internet land. Negative ratings mean nothing.

You were the one who started it by rating an obvious joke post as "dumb"


We get it, you don’t like the guy.

Let’s talk about three-chin general Alexander Vindman then if you want to argue legitimacy of decorations.
He got the "NYT bestseller" Medal - awarded to those whose vanity autobiography is bought in the truckload by various political and media arms, and then shipped directly from publisher to landfill, as it was only "sold" to lend legitimacy to it's claims that the left is right and the right is wrong.

I was trying to crack the code on when the left likes the military and when they don't.... and it all comes down to "Can we put this guy on MSNBC and have him say without hesitation that Trump is a dictator and he will not follow a dictator's orders?"
 
Exactly.

That said, Bronze Stars are given out like candy these days, especially ones without the "V" for Valour device

Now a Silver Star is still a VERY legit medal as is the DSC, Flying Cross and Purple Heart and of course the CMOH
My V device was downgraded to just the medal because by bde co was (and probably still is) a cunt. Plenty of ground pounders with naked ribbons rolling around too, not just the fobbits.
 
Man, the author is a stinky retard, and makes the entire argument against having this guy as SecDef look retarded.

Unironically I don't think Hegseth is a good candidate but has nothing to do with whether or not he has a fat enough stack. In my opinion, he simply just lacks the experience. He served for a little over a decade in the National Guard and got out as a Major. His service record, by all accounts, seems honorable and he was well liked by his soldiers, but he frankly just doesn't have the experience at the strategic level I'd like to see in a SecDef. This isn't to say he's not intelligent. Despite the left trying to smear him as some kind of off the rails fratboy, he has an MPP from Harvard, he is obviously very intelligent and very well educated.
 
My V device was downgraded to just the medal because by bde co was (and probably still is) a cunt. Plenty of ground pounders with naked ribbons rolling around too, not just the fobbits.
It is particularly galling to see some slick sleeve O-5 with a dozen Bronze Stars, especially when you consider that he had to really work to avoid a deployment to Afghanistan or Iraq during our 20 year long war for nothing.
 
I live in the real world, not internet land. Negative ratings mean nothing.
I just negrated your post.

FAQ​

What does this mean?​

The amount of karma (points) on your post and Kiwifarms account has decreased by one.

Why did you do this?​

There are several reasons I may deem a comment to be unworthy of positive or neutral karma. These include, but are not limited to:
  • Rudeness towards other kiwis,
  • Spreading incorrect information,
  • Sarcasm not correctly flagged with a /sneed.

Am I banned from the kiwifarms?​

No - not yet. But you should refrain from making comments like this in the future. Otherwise I will be forced to issue an additional negrate, which may put your commenting and posting privileges in jeopardy.

I don't believe my comment deserved a negrate. Can you un-negrate it?​

Sure, mistakes happen. But only in exceedingly rare circumstances will I undo a negrate. If you would like to issue an appeal, shoot me a private message explaining what I got wrong. I tend to respond to Kiwifarms PMs within several minutes. Do note, however, that over 99.9% of negrate appeals are rejected, and yours is likely no exception.

How can I prevent this from happening in the future?​

Accept the negrate and move on. But learn from this mistake: your behavior will not be tolerated on kiwifarms.st. I will continue to issue negrates until you improve your conduct. Remember: Kiwifarms is privilege, not a right.
 
Last edited:
So he is a soldier? Being a drunk retard harassing the locals and financing Ford Mustangs at 20% APR is part of his culture.
Don't forget marrying strippers!
Guys, he's an officer, his culture is less mustangs and strippers and more getting drunk and fucking the wives of his fellow officers. I mean, basically the same thing, but slightly classier.

For me the best indicator he might be good at the job, is that he's not a general.
Considering that just about every general Trump had in his admin last time around turned out to be a snake and our current SecDef is a general who has presided over a stretch of absolute incompetency, failures, and that time he went in for surgery for a week and no one knew where he was, I'm willing to give the Major a chance.
 
I'm simply amazed at how many people seemed to be after this guy for being crap at running a business when he was in his early 30's, having an alcohol use problem after coming back from serving in Iraq & Afghanistan, and slamming bitches right and left (both while he was and wasn't married). The only thing you could arguably fault him for is catching bitches left and right while married. But, if we held that as a criteria for holding office in the federal government, we'd probably lose 1/2 the senators, many members of the house of representatives, and a former president of the united states who did it while in office. I mean, come on, it's getting a little ridiculous.
 
Back