UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson fatally shot outside Hilton hotel in Midtown in targeted attack: cops - Just Part and Parcel of visiting a Big City

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I mean if this really was a hit to stop him from being put through a deposition then this is going to be filed under the same category as "Epstein didn't kill himself" for the next 1000 years.
If that were the motivation/angle here I imagine the healthcare industry cabal was worried as a whole that what he might say would cause regulations to fuck up their golden goose.

Someone might already mentioned in this thread the possibility then it could be a insidejob. There's an ex-NYPD officer who think of this possibility.
The engravings on the bullets suggest that this was not done to prevent him from testifying. "Deny Defend Depose" really amped up the energy in hating the swindling corpo scum. This outcome is worse for UH than if they just let him testify. Instead of some relatively miniscule fines and a few taxpayer funded trips to Club Fed we now have a modern day Robin Hood on our hands.
 
It devolves it into identity politics for no fucking reason though. It also opens up the argument "well he's getting about 10000x the budget for his investigation than Deshawnius III did when he got blasted by some gangbangers."

Just enjoy the fleeting sense of unity and enjoy the fact that humanity as a whole still despises those who exploit the sick and dying.
There is a reason though, the right wing loves populism and deploying the righteous public anger firehose at targets, until it’s turned around on them. They need to invoke distractions. You’re only celebrating because it’s a white guy!

It’s interesting to see the left leaning media and shills are leading with stories about the public anger being unleashed by the murder while right wing shills are trying to pretend it’s only antifa trannies and trolls celebrating murder and focusing on the manhunt for a terrorist.

The media, on both sides are corporate shills, but this time a suit from their team got got. The left has made healthcare reform an issue for decades, while the right has bootlicked the insurance industry for decades. Telling people socialized medicine will put you before suicide tribunals and we have the best healthcare in the world (that only the elite can afford) isn’t helping, so try lets try injecting racism and misogyny!

The right wing shills just want this story to go away because they aren’t having any luck trying to make the narrative sympathetic to the health insurance industry. They don’t want people, from both sides of the political spectrum, dancing in the streets together while burning effigies of insurance executives. It’s making bankers sweat too.
 
There is a very good reason UnitedHealth was targeted and not one of the other half a dozen insurers in the USA. They have the highest denial rate in the country, literally double the industry average and the worst of all the big insurers.

The problem isn't that UH was and is making money. It's that they are running a scam on people by offering a service and never delivering it. This is why most people on the right are laughing about it because fucker had it coming.
I know people theorize the shooter might have personally been fucked over by UH, but it seems more likely he just carefully weighed and selected an optimal target.

Lots of people fantasize about planning a hit for the “right reasons”. If that was the case here, he chose very wisely.
 

What a fucking knuckle dragging baboon take to immediately make it about race. Take note of the people who are so against what has happened here, for they know not the plight of the common man.

And they are NOT your friend.

Is he wrong though? Surely you'd still have a lot of people still rejoicing, sticking to the healthcare perspective, but I'm pretty sure the narrative would be quite different and you'd see a lot less praise for the shooter. The racism angle would definitely be played into, that's not even up for debate.

I think it applies even more when you consider how many people are celebrating solely on the perspective of "sticking it to the evil CEO" rather than substantial and measurable improvements to people's lives. These people are far more likely to be swayed away by identity factors.

Yes he's absolutely wrong, leftist twitter would be dropping more hard R's than we do if the CEO was black.

No matt Walsh as always is 100% spot on. This is the usual intersection of anti white and anti rich leftist bs. If the CEO was black and the shooter was white they would play the angle of "white supremacist terrorist".

Don't kid yourselves, this is like the Palestine situation, only reason these lefties are for Palestine is that it's Brown people being the victim of "white people".

The rich angle in this allows plausible deniability much like "muh genocide" gives them cover.

Can't believe some of you are so naive.
 
I was talking about this to one of my irl friends. Most of the time I don't agree with people who go "DeAtH To C.E.O's" or whatever rhetoric that they spew but, this time this guy is directly related to denying health claims for rather important surgeries and other treatments. Kinda hard to not see their point this one time. I know giving them any sort of validation is a bad thing but I see what they are yelping about in earnest this time.
Killing people is not the appropriate way to settle differences in a civilized society, but you said it: this is a company that is responsible for denying coverage for countless people, and has been legally prosecuted for fucking people on their claims as well. I'm not happy about it, but I do not feel sorry for this individual.
 
Can somebody explain to me who "them" is in this situation.
The usual suspects. The anti rich, anti white and anti authority types that latch on to every retarded activist movement in the last 15 years.

Basically, "I'm poor, Brown and can't get no pussy/husband so everyone else should suffer my misery because I suffer from extreme success envy, also fuck you dad."

Walsh is derailing the gravedancing by making up hypotheticals. His dumb boomer audience will now start defending Thompson thanks to him arguing with a strawman over a debate nobody was having.

Keep in mind, he works for Ben Shapiro.
As they should Walsh is 100 spot on.

I expect this sort of retard takes from reddit idiots or people who have anime/trans flags/pronouns in their bios but not this place.
 
The usual suspects. The anti rich, anti white and anti authority types that latch on to every retarded activist movement in the last 15 years.

Basically, "I'm poor, Brown and can't get no pussy/husband so everyone else should suffer my misery because I suffer from extreme success envy, also fuck you dad."
You don't like rich people.

YOU AIN'T WHITE

proxy-image.jpg
 
The usual suspects. The anti rich, anti white and anti authority types that latch on to every retarded activist movement in the last 15 years.

Basically, "I'm poor, Brown and can't get no pussy/husband so everyone else should suffer my misery because I suffer from extreme success envy, also fuck you dad."


As they should Walsh is 100 spot on.

I expect this sort of retard takes from reddit idiots or people who have anime/trans flags/pronouns in their bios but not this place.
Congratulations on having the most retarded take so far, it couldn't have been easy.
 
The usual suspects. The anti rich, anti white and anti authority types that latch on to every retarded activist movement in the last 15 years.

Basically, "I'm poor, Brown and can't get no pussy/husband so everyone else should suffer my misery because I suffer from extreme success envy, also fuck you dad."
I'm going to assume you're arguing genuinely and not just being provocative. I would be more inclined to agree with you if somebody like let's say...Elon musk got shot down in the street. Or some random millionaire nobody knows that made his fat stacks selling cars or computers or something idk.


But this dude is a specific kind of evil. He's not hated because he's rich. He's hated because he is the face and often times direct policy maker in killing people's children due to denying them life saving care.

I know that reads super fucking dramatic. But it's the truth. This man is the ceo and shark of a company that kills people children at an even higher rate than his competitors for profit. And he pissed off the wrong dude and a lot of people share in that anger. If the dude is really some kind of retard that just picked a random ceo or has some kind of tragic backstory I don't know. But he did something a lot of motherfuckers wish they had the guts or know how to do.

And that's really it. Nothing to do with race politics or whatever.
 
I do not promote political assassination at all. However, I have no sympathy for this guy, or any other CEOs of health insurance companies. They disgust me more than CEOs for alcohol, or tobacco, or defense companies. At least you know what those people sell - it says it on the tin. Healthcare companies in the US suck people dry and do next to nothing for them.

I was talking about this to one of my irl friends. Most of the time I don't agree with people who go "DeAtH To C.E.O's" or whatever rhetoric that they spew but, this time this guy is directly related to denying health claims for rather important surgeries and other treatments. Kinda hard to not see their point this one time. I know giving them any sort of validation is a bad thing but I see what they are yelping about in earnest this time.

Killing people is not the appropriate way to settle differences in a civilized society, but you said it: this is a company that is responsible for denying coverage for countless people, and has been legally prosecuted for fucking people on their claims as well. I'm not happy about it, but I do not feel sorry for this individual.

Sorry but they aren't entitled to pay for everything. Health insurance is a business they didn't say they wouldn't provide surgeries or care they just said they won't pay for some of it. Nobody is stopping these people from getting their care.

Congratulations on having the most retarded take so far, it couldn't have been easy.
No my take is that of an adult not of an angsty terminally online loser like yourself.
But this dude is a specific kind of evil. He's not hated because he's rich. He's hated because he is the face and often times direct policy maker in killing people's children due to denying them life saving care.

Again that's where you're wrong.
They aren't deny care, they are deny payment which is their right. Pay for it yourself or get coverage that will.
 
Last edited:
Back