US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Can you really call it lying when the Left has no beliefs at all? They're not really lying as they can do a 180 in a split second and fully believe it.

Hypocrisy doesn't began to cover it, it's more like a will full desire to believe whatever is best for their side at the exact second in time and still hold themselves as moral.
They do have beliefs, it's just that they think anything that brings them closer to a society where they can masturbate in public and predate on children is a net good. My fiancee was telling me how she knew some people at her work who were trying to trick THEIR FUCKING PARENTS into not voting for Trump. They did this because they want to masturbate in public and predate on children. That is their zion, their penis is their godhead and hurting the ones they love is their confession
 
Lmao I’m not even mad. Chocolate messiah is seething. His legacy will be nothing no one will remember this commie fuck the way we will remember trump ahahahahhahahah cry Obama CRY
I’d say his legacy was dead the second Trump got in.

What’s he remembered for by most people? Being black.

I think that’s why he is mad. He’s realised he was a token black all along.
 
I seen the crypto talk, and I know a lot of people are so of lost on it, and why it's such a good thing. The blockchain is the interesting and most useful part. I'll try to explain it as simply as I can, and how I think it might be the best tech of the past 25 years. The blockchain is just a online ledger, you can verify anything on it, and it keeps a record of being verified. It's unhackable, and cannot be faked. Bitcoin is just a pile of virtual money, and it's only worth what people think it is. The value of it isn't really the inherent value, it's the idea it exists outside of the federal reserve, or really outside of any banking regulation. That's why the people that hate it, do hate it. But, the value is the blockchain. We could use it for elections, we could use it for anything we want to have transparency on.
 
I mean, I don't blame them. It's not like she was going to win, might as well bilk them and get your ass paid
Holy Shit - this is the plot of the movie The Producers. Get all the investment you can knowing you've a guaranteed flop on your hands and you'll never be asked to deliver. Just filter away all the investment money as fast as you can.
 
I

have a friend who works in govt and she admits that it can take her (and other) up to 3 mo to respond to an email. Not because busy, but because they just don't care.
I know someone in US government. They each have an efficiency score. This employee's score says that he does the work of 1.75 people. Dude gets all his stuff done and accurately.

The office head is demanding that he slow down and is threatening him with punishment for working too fast.

You tell me. I don't know.
 
I know someone in US government. They each have an efficiency score. This employee's score says that he does the work of 1.75 people. Dude gets all his stuff done and accurately.

The office head is demanding that he slow down and is threatening him with punishment for working too fast.

You tell me. I don't know.
dude needs to get DOGE on the DMs asap
 
Too late on that one I'm afraid.
Nah, the current lot like to think themselves +130 IQ (and their predecessors like Kissinger and Galbraith most certainly were), but this current lot are nothing but a bunch of Ivy League credentialed incurious dimwits who regularly fail the the high IQ version of the "How would you feel if you didn't have breakfast?" question. Just look at how bad they are at modeling second and third order knock-on effects. They simply don't know enough of the variables, much less hold them in their head to process possible outcomes when designing policy. It's why things are going so badly for them.

it sounds like we don't get to choose and have to ride that tiger
Right now we don't get to choose, and its what we have to do, but a decent society shouldn't expect everyone to do so. Forcing normies to ride the tiger leads them to become broke drug-addicted debt slaves and leads to civilizational and cultural decline. If we have any ability whatsoever, we must make an utmost effort to keep them from strapping Grandma onto Shere Khan.

I find crypto annoying, but libertarian economics is usually the only reasonable thing when it comes to monetary policy, wages, prices, and production. I don't mind some protectionism but I have never bought argumentss regarding money from non-libertarians because it was the Republicans who pushed for a central bank in the first place
Certainly the current PTB are addicted to pulling levers everytime they run into a problem when they should leave well enough alone, but at the same time libertarian economics will eventually drift into the same pitfalls a libertarian social and cultural policy will due to its ideological insistence on certain aspects of human nature that are incorrect. The economy being an extension of human society will exhibit the foibles of man as it does not exist outside him. It is possible to see the weaknesses of a laissez-faire approach and attempt to account for them when needed, and for that matter, vice versa. Pragmatism is necessary. And yes, I am aware of the deep irony that I'm advocating that when my handle invokes probably the least pragmatic social thinker of the modern era.
 
Obama is utterly pissed with rage that he wasted his last "get the deep state to murder someone, no questions asked" kill card on murdering Scalia in order to end his time as Presidency as the guy who flipped the Supreme Court to a liberal majority for at least 30-40 years, rather than killing Trump. And I'm sure Michelle never fucking lets up on this in private, since she most likely made him burn one of his klll cards on Joan Rivers but only for her to be told "no" on the issue if using one on Trump since Barrack probably felt roasting Trump like he did at the correspondence dinner the same night he gave the order to kill Bin Ladin was a crueler fate.
 
I have a friend who works in govt and she admits that it can take her (and other) up to 3 mo to respond to an email. Not because busy, but because they just don't care.
I will never understand why they don’t just fix that by paying the people who get all of the shit done on time extra or threaten to fire everyone that doesn’t.
 
Last edited:
Zoro is in North Carolina surveying the lack of any help from the faggots in charge, and I have a feeling there is going to be a extreme makeover home edition type push to rebuild the areas when Trump gets into office. Just a blatant show of what should be happening compared to what has not for 3 months. But Vance also took time to say Hegseth is staying, fuck all you faggots:

KWB008.png




More pressure on Ernst, including what looks like her first primary challenger in a while, the Iowa AG lady who endorsed Trump very early on. People can see the bullshit from a mile away, it's just a matter of Ernst learning her lesson or doubling down and joining the old crones Murkowski and Collins to be dumb bitches for 2 years.

KWB007.png
KWB009.png


Boa Hancock was on Fox this morning, usual First Lady happy talk for Christmas, but the Trump dance was brought up:
KWB011.png
 
Certainly the current PTB are addicted to pulling levers everytime they run into a problem when they should leave well enough alone, but at the same time libertarian economics will eventually drift into the same pitfalls a libertarian social and cultural policy will due to its ideological insistence on certain aspects of human nature that are incorrect. The economy being an extension of human society will exhibit the foibles of man as it does not exist outside him. It is possible to see the weaknesses of a laissez-faire approach and attempt to account for them when needed, and for that matter, vice versa. Pragmatism is necessary. And yes, I am aware of the deep irony that I'm advocating that when my handle invokes probably the least pragmatic social thinker of the modern era.
Libertarianism works better as an impulse than as a formal philosophy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back