🐟 Fishtank Sam Hyde's Fishtank.live General - Jet Neptune's Little House of Horrors

Official KF Fishtank livechat here!

Is it over?

  • Yes, I am sad and need a Ben backrub :(

    Votes: 331 31.7%
  • No, we will be back, autism too strong

    Votes: 528 50.6%
  • Cams down until we roll into Bloodgames 2

    Votes: 185 17.7%

  • Total voters
    1,044
It's not that hard to understand. They vote for people they don't like, then the audience votes to save who we like.


You say democracy is fake and gay, but then you want them to rig challenges in favor of the most liked contestants. You're going the long way to end up back where you were.
You missed the very explicit point: I want fish too retarded to comprehend that simple voting mechanic.
 
Last edited:
What I'm getting from this is that they plan very little in advance ( e.g. having no idea what to do at the start of season 2), and that when they do plan something that doesn't work out how they expect ( e.g. the failed plant angle in season 2, Alex leaving, famous house 2.0) they just sort of give up. I'm amazed that the show isn't even more of a clusterfuck and still manages to be better than 99% of the slop on tv.
Okay but watching those mfs live at like 1am whispering about something while every person, one at a time, starts laughing and i realized what was going on it was the most kino shit ever. I already had suspicions about a few of them but I didn't think almost everyone knew.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cope&Sneed
On their discussion about the voting system; there's multiple ways to fix it.
  • You could have the fish nominate 3 people (top three people with most votes), but have audience decide on the elimination. You get the benefit of people "playing the game", but not the downside of interesting people getting the boot (as long as the audience doesn't go full retard).
  • You can also have vote-to-save instead of vote-to-kick, which changes the dynamic.
  • Instead of 1 fish getting 1 vote, you can give them 3 point votes (2 points for their bigger threat, 1 point for the lesser threat), which further changes the dynamic.
  • You can even ban the discussion of voting completely, only let them discuss who they are voting for in the voting room (this has positives and negatives).
You can use all or any combination of these to make it so voting doesn't eliminate the most interesting people.
It’s not fucking big brother. No votes. Period.
 
1733554776178.png
 
It’s not fucking big brother. No votes. Period.
The Wiggers are the ones who made it like Big Brother. They want Edgy Big Brother, with blackjack and literal hookers.

That's what they were aiming for with Famous House. They won't get rid of voting, they'll just fuck around with it a bit so they can force the results they want.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: ANightOwl
Back