Why racism is bad?

[Brightstar777]

Why racism is bad? it is beneficial to avoid niggers and homosexuals because they are the worst in my experience, niggers are so stupid and criminals, niggers shouldn't be allowed to buy guns at all, homosexuals are unstable and have a lot of mental problems, Self harm and suicidal thoughts, they suck to deal with, what is wrong with racism if it is evolutionary beneficial and natural for human beings to avoid subjects that doesn't benefit them and are harmful, and a liability to their society.

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

In theory, you should judge people based on their actions rather than superficial qualities like skin color.

In practice, Indians.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Racism is bad because the powers that be say so
Same question as "Why democracy is good?"

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Racism, as in the actual definition, meaning hating an entire race of people, is bad because you shouldn't hate innocent people for things they can't control like their race.

The liberal definition of racism is having pattern recognition and acting accordingly. That's not a bad thing.

 

[Owlbear]

"Racism bad" is a product of the liberal tabula rasa idea. If you assume everyone starts as a blank slate, a slate with a black border and a slate with a white border are the same.

In reality, though, people are not a blank slate. White people in India don't start shitting in the street. Black Americans clearly have different outcomes than white Americans.

 

[BiggestKai]

Why do OPs across the internet insist on asking questions in the form "Why <subject> is gay?" instead of "Why is <subject> gay?"

 

[Maurice Maine]

In theory, you should judge people based on their actions rather than superficial qualities like skin color.

In practice, Indians.

There could have been an effort to research the differences between races but the 20th century basically annihilated such ideas and I'm not sure if we can nail entire civilizations down to stereotypes...

 

[Bababooey Warlock]

There could have been an effort to research the differences between races but the 20th century basically annihilated such ideas and I'm not sure if we can nail entire civilizations down to stereotypes...

Differences between races and subraces you say? Like the distinction between Bantus, Nilotes, Pygmies, and the Khoi-San in Africa? Hell, I might go as far to say that Basques are the real white people, instead of the cucked Northern European mumbo-jumbo.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

"Racism bad" is a product of the liberal tabula rasa idea. If you assume everyone starts as a blank slate, a slate with a black border and a slate with a white border are the same.

In reality, though, people are not a blank slate. White people in India don't start shitting in the street. Black Americans clearly have different outcomes than white Americans.

I don't know about that. If you raised a White guy in a Muslim country as an experiment, and somehow controlled for factors like him being discriminated against (so he can be "just another Muslim"), he might fit in and be just as slimy as mudslimes. I think there's a bit of both to account for, nature & nurture.

Now, maybe if you did the experiment 100 times you'd see Whites be less slimy overall, but I'm sure some would be just about as bad as a true sand nigger. We kinda see the opposite, we get Clarence Thomas or Vivek Ramaswamy types sometimes because they're essentially raised white. On the other hand they night also just be genetically superior niggers and pajeets. I don't know, it's hard to say.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Racism is bad because the powers that be say so
Same question as "Why democracy is good?"

Racism is bad, in theory, because the characteristics of the class do not map to the individual 100% of the time. Racism stops you from finding genuinely good or useful people, the kind you do want to associate with, because of a generalized bias.

In practice, racism against the group can save lives, increase social cohesion and trust, preserve your existing society, and improve your culture. Reconciling these two aspects of racism is nearly impossible in a liberal society, especially one that (claims to) value freedom, meritocracy, and individual rights.

---

Democracy is good, in theory, because it prevents tyranny. The masses are not expected to be smart, choose good policies, choose honest leaders. They are expected to vote for people who won't oppress them. Given majority rule, this means in theory you will never get a leader who oppresses the majority.

In practice, this gets subverted a thousand different ways. Liberalism enables the intransigent minority to oppress the majority. Progressives use guilt and modernity's ennui to get the majority to vote for self-oppressing rules. Adolf Hitler was elected, which many claim was a bad thing, but he did not oppress the majority of his people; he was therefore a legitimate democratic ruler. Nobody wants to grapple with the many failures of democracy, because they can't figure out a better alternative; only revert to worse alternatives from humanity's past.

Glad I could help.

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

Because racism is a denial of globalism. The core globalist tenet is that everyone must be homogenized into one for economic efficiency, thus the focus on equality and equity. Globalism requires tolerance on unprecedented levels, so to assert racial distinctions and discriminate based on race is to deny the value of globalism itself. That's why the system reacts so harshly to racism, because unlike far worse acts like pedophilia, racism is a direct affront to the system itself.

This is the core reason and is clear based on the construction of the society we live. The secondary reason is that every society needs someone to hate, since it burns off steam and keeps society focused. In the old days, we hated people of other races and religions, but under globalism that's forbidden. So our new outgroup acceptable to hate is racists.

That's the root cause of why racism is bad in today's society. All other reasons they say racism is bad stem from this.

 

[Troon_Patrol]

%99 of people are racist. The majority simply just don't overtly act on it in social groups it's deemed "bad". Outside of the North America the western typical society where people are not judged for not being naive they aren't bound by by cancel culture and nativity being a virtue they are openly racist.


Speaking purely of the Western society, it's still %99 racist in some manner. Pretending you are ignorant is considered virtuous, or being racist against white people is treated in the same manner. Sometimes people lie to themselves to the level they get themselves killed trying to prove they are not aware of a statistical clear fact. IE "I will walk through the worst neighborhood in Chicago with a Rolex and platinum chain, to prove the dangers are just racist stereotypes." 7 minutes into the stroll they are usually raped and murdered in this type of demonstration.

 

[Turquoise]

Racism is bad because all human groups are exactly the same to the 10th decimal place. The differences that we can observe all around us are the result of environmental and cultural factors only, since genes play no role at the group level from the neck up. The brain cannot be changed by evolutionary pressures (except for when it happens all the time in other species and in our own recent past).

 

[Pomniman]

The actual issue is that being too honest is a cardinal sin in "polite" society. The more anti-racist someone born or just trying too hard to fit into the first world claims to be the more they're overcompensating for a moral deficiency others have accused them of.

 

[Kovachs]

I think racism is bad when it eliminates ethnic differences within and between various racial groups, and when it threatens liberty.

The most pernicious form of racism is "racial justice" and civil rights legislation. Of course, racial nationalism is ridiculous as well. Both perform the same function of "democratizing" society, and of limiting civil liberties.

 

[YHWH's Strongest Soldier]

Why do OPs across the internet insist on asking questions in the form "Why <subject> is gay?" instead of "Why is <subject> gay?"

OP is a Balkan gypsy and not a native English speaker. Low effort threads are usually made by non-white people with a poor grasp of English.

 

[Internet Wizard]

what is wrong with racism if it is evolutionary beneficial and natural for human beings to avoid subjects that doesn't benefit them and are harmful, and a liability to their society.

Then I'm sure you've had a lot of experience?

 

[isalaide]

Why do OPs across the internet insist on asking questions in the form "Why <subject> is gay?" instead of "Why is <subject> gay?"

brown hands type the OPs

 

[DefinitelyNotMe]

How much of it is actually race and not the culture that one is growing up with
is Indian from India will be as retarded as India that all his life lived in Poland for example?

 

[Dyn]

How much of it is actually race and not the culture that one is growing up with
is Indian from India will be as retarded as India that all his life lived in Poland for example?

Yes because Poles are just as retarded as Indians.