Inactive Shmorky / David Kelly / Daisy Kay / Sandypants / Peaches the Puppy & Ex-Fiance Amanda "Mandy" Mullen - Something Awful throwaway, pedophile sexual predator, abusive tranny schizo chaser; batshit crazy ex-fiancée

I'm sure she's been posting for a long time. She's nutty as fuck and likes the attention.
You seem as though this bothers you personally and are flailing about for attention yourself. I mean, you've only been saying that repeatedly since you showed up as if we don't know the context of her presence.

Do you think that:
A) We don't already know she has issues?

and

B) Your comments are any more insightful than what has already been said or known to us about her history and mental issues?
 
I actually have more questions than anything. What meds are you on, for starters? Are you on disability? Did it ever occur to you that the weird fucker who talked like a kid and liked to wear diapers might be a pedophile, and that's why he didn't let you anywhere near his computer at all? Was that a warning sign?

Do you think if you were less of a sadbrained fuckup other children might not have been groomed? If evidence comes out that Shmorky actually did physically molest someone, how are you going to sleep at night knowing that you went along with this game for years while getting high and reading weird conspiracy shit and ignoring it?

Obviously you didn't do any of this, but do you feel your continued silence contributed to any of it?

I understand, she must have been nuts to put up with that piece of crap. There must have been other less shitty (kek) sugardaddies around. Even an extra horny 50 year old man with an extra wrinkled scrotum would have been a life upgrade beside Shmorky, so Mandaryn was clearly cooky to stay with him from that angle.

But what do you think she could have done to Smorky to make him to stop? There isn't enough shit to get him arrested, and he did not value her input. So she did not have enough sway over him to make him stop by herself, so she had to have gone to the cops.

Imagine when someone comes up to the cop.
"I'm on medication and a bit crazy but I think my boyfriend is a pedophile. He likes shitting into diapers and drawing furry porn."
The cop's reply would have been:
"Do you have any evidence?"
"What is a furry?"

They would not have gotten enough for a search warrant, and most cops would have not risked their careers by illegally searching a tranny, especially how much liberal administrations love troons.
 
Why is it whenever a sick fuck is outed there's always someone on standby to scream at anyone in their vicinity about how 'You should have known and reported it!!!"
If every weird fuck with some off fetishes was reported to the police their lines would be bogged down all day every day, most people can't really 'spot' a peado without overt evidence and even then a natural reaction is to be disbelieving cos noone wants to admit they were associated with them, nevermind the aforementioned point that the police won't react without hard evidence either. Screaming at people who 'should' have known does nothing to undo the damage done and is waste of time. Chill the fuck out.
 
Why is it whenever a sick fuck is outed there's always someone on standby to scream at anyone in their vicinity about how 'You should have known and reported it!!!"

100% serious I've never heard that before. People go out of their way to be polite and say dumb comforting shit like "you couldn't have known" and "it's not your fault"
 
100% serious I've never heard that question asked before. People go out of their way to be polite and say dumb comforting shit like "you couldn't have known" and "it's not your fault"
Ok if we're being serious what exactly could have been done differently here?
Without the evidence of the chatlogs at their disposal, how are the police supposed to convict Shmorky? What crimes were openly committed to report? It's all well and good saying someone 'should' know when something like this is going on but seriously what was supposed to have been done here to justify laying the blame for these crimes at another person's feet?
 
I understand, she must have been nuts to put up with that piece of crap. There must have been other less shitty (kek) sugardaddies around. Even an extra horny 50 year old man with an extra wrinkled scrotum would have been a life upgrade beside Shmorky, so Mandaryn was clearly cooky to stay with him from that angle.

But what do you think she could have done to Smorky to make him to stop? There isn't enough shit to get him arrested, and he did not value her input. So she did not have enough sway over him to make him stop by herself, so she had to have gone to the cops.

Imagine when someone comes up to the cop.
"I'm on medication and a bit crazy but I think my boyfriend is a pedophile. He likes shitting into diapers and drawing furry porn."
The cop's reply would have been:
"Do you have any evidence?"
"What is a furry?"

They would not have gotten enough for a search warrant, and most cops would have not risked their careers by illegally searching a tranny, especially how much liberal administrations love troons.


I don't know how many people are familiar with Mandy's postings elsewhere, but given the accusations of child sexual abuse she's made in respect of other people when she's psychotic (and even past that point - she was still saying stuff about Lowtax 5 months after the original shitstorm), she's even less likely to be believed without hard evidence than some rando off the internet.

It's extremely unlikely that Shmorky will be investigated even with the additional information that's come to light - information which Mandy and other people who dealt with Shmorky on a regular basis didn't even have until now.

@Wiggles is either trolling, terminally stupid, or both.
 
Ok if we're being serious what exactly could have been done differently here?
Without the evidence of the chatlogs at their disposal, how are the police supposed to convict Shmorky? What crimes were openly committed to report? It's all well and good saying someone 'should' know when something like this is going on but seriously what was supposed to have been done here to justify laying the blame for these crimes at another person's feet?
Also it kind of ignores the fact that there's a limited amount that anybody who knew him knew about what was going on. Dude was able to completely mask the different sides of his personality from the different people who interacted with him in different mediums. As an example, he made fun of diaper furry pedos along with the rest of FYAD when it initially came up, and deflected the spotlight away from himself extremely effectively.
 
Also it kind of ignores the fact that there's a limited amount that anybody who knew him knew about what was going on. Dude was able to completely mask the different sides of his personality from the different people who interacted with him in different mediums. As an example, he made fun of diaper furry pedos along with the rest of FYAD when it initially came up, and deflected the spotlight away from himself extremely effectively.
That's the scary part about it all, people claim that something should have been done or someone should have noticed but in reality pedos can be extremely clever about their portrayal to the outside world. Hell Shmorky could be considered one of the sloppier ones in terms of hiding his fetishes but he still knew when to keep his mouth shut and divert attention away from himself.
Just hits a sore spot when people who were near the person are blamed for not knowing considering I myself had a teacher who was outed as a peadophile and I can honestly say at the time I thought he was an awesome bloke and a good laugh, noone wants to admit they misjudged someone so badly and to have it thrown in their face after the fact can be pretty gut wrenching.
 
I actually have more questions than anything. What meds are you on, for starters? Are you on disability? Did it ever occur to you that the weird fucker who talked like a kid and liked to wear diapers might be a pedophile, and that's why he didn't let you anywhere near his computer at all? Was that a warning sign?

Do you think if you were less of a sadbrained fuckup other children might not have been groomed? If evidence comes out that Shmorky actually did physically molest someone, how are you going to sleep at night knowing that you went along with this game for years while getting high and reading weird conspiracy shit and ignoring it?

Obviously you didn't do any of this, but do you feel your continued silence contributed to any of it?

Lowtax-sama will never notice you and you'll never get this back

7322newsimg.jpg
 
100% serious I've never heard that before. People go out of their way to be polite and say dumb comforting shit like "you couldn't have known" and "it's not your fault"

both of these things happen, you're only focusing on the one part of people who act like this.

anyway, she has made it clear to us that she did not know about shmorkys inappropriate contact with minors. she said that yes, she had seen some of his "art" when she snooped in his room once, but showing the police art and saying "i suspect he's a pedophile" isn't really enough. im sure if she knew that shmorky was grooming minors, she would have stepped in somehow.

She could have told police "i suspect this" but where would that have gone? im sure it would have went absolutely no where.

sorry for babbling nonsense we already know, and barely wording my thoughts right.
 
Jesus Christ I go out of town for a few weeks and I come back to see that Shmorky has gone from regular cow to full blown call the police cow with his juggalo brother in the thread.

Who's up next in the batting cage, his fucking mom?

Though honestly I'm not sure I want to know his mom's opinions on Shmorky's sex fantasties about babies and their moms taking bathes together. Must be hard for a mother to defend that sort of stuff.
 
I actually have more questions than anything. What meds are you on, for starters? Are you on disability? Did it ever occur to you that the weird fucker who talked like a kid and liked to wear diapers might be a pedophile, and that's why he didn't let you anywhere near his computer at all? Was that a warning sign?

Do you think if you were less of a sadbrained fuckup other children might not have been groomed? If evidence comes out that Shmorky actually did physically molest someone, how are you going to sleep at night knowing that you went along with this game for years while getting high and reading weird conspiracy shit and ignoring it?

Obviously you didn't do any of this, but do you feel your continued silence contributed to any of it?

Go back to SA. Again, it's blatantly obvious that you're defending Shmork while trying to make it look like you're not by creating these derails and deflecting attention towards everything but him. Everyone, please stop feeding the goons.

lol so what do you want us to do about it? We're not the police nigga

Kiwi Farms: SVU

There must have been other less shitty (kek) sugar daddies around.

A Sugar Daddy implies I was with him for money, you've got that backwards, I was the one supporting him.
 
Back