Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.2%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 103 25.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 73 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 163 40.0%

  • Total voters
    407
Remember that Nick did whatever weird revenge crimes against Aaron that he did to influence a pending criminal case in Candy Yoshi County. And Nick and Kayla are both witnesses in that ridiculous revenge porn case Aaron has.

These things don't occur in a vacuum.
Imagine you are a run-of-the-mill officer in rural MN, relatively calm but some occasional tweakers and then you face the Balldofamily and get work worth for a year cut out for you.
 
He didn't even parse the syntaxes wrong she said if it wasn't for the kids dad and her telling the truth to them.
"If it wasn't for their dad and I telling the truth about love and sex and the two of us- those kids would have been left to read all the lies and cheap filth you bottom-feeding scum have put on the internet for a year now!! Nick and I will keep telling the truth, you won't!"

While the meaning of the sentence is obvious (if you are changing the children's understanding of what happened by "telling the truth" necessarily they must hear you say it), April never says "telling the truth to them" in so many words. It's not fooling anybody but that's the kind of technicality you might latch onto to walk back your slampiece's insane admission that your version of The Talk begins:

"When a mommy and a daddy and a mommy and a daddy love each other very much, Daddy #1 takes a special blue pill and inserts his scrotum into a small silicone tube while Daddy #2 prepares the snack tray and Mommy #2 uses her credit card to cut up the nose medicine."
 
Because I think he's so stupid he sees "nick is a shit lawyer" as "I am a better lawyer" . It's amazing he thinks the path is to try to own kiwis is legal trivia vs recognizing that what they're saying is that arrogance is clouding his judgement and that knowing the process better isn't equal to having the humility to realize it applies to you too in order to best navigate it
Except, especially lately, almost everything he says is completely wrong and no practicing lawyer, and not even most laypeople, would fall for his insanely dumb bullshit. The only people who even pretend to believe the nonsense and lies that come out of his cockholster are grifters like Frei and Barnes and literal schizos like Still-Born.
Sorry I was raised on only the highest tier of comedy and don't understand this humour, can you rewrite the joke to include Stephen Hawking being unable to walk and sandwiches?
Cops can't read Denny's menus because they're fat. And then Stephen Hawking stood up and applauded.
Imagine you are a run-of-the-mill officer in rural MN, relatively calm but some occasional tweakers and then you face the Balldofamily and get work worth for a year cut out for you.
They're going to want this case (and the other) in the rear view mirror as soon as possible. An exception might be if it's taking so long to figure out what do with some bullshit "cybercrime" and then they might not want to delay the original case. Or if they want to fuck Nick so bad they figure out a way to try him on the second crime(s) so he can have priors for sentencing on that one. (Not sure if this could happen in Minnesota.)
 
Bear witness to the literary stylings of Still-Born, the resident fedposter and oft only active participant in Nick's LOCALS.

He has more ambition than Nick at this point.

View attachment 6726092

View attachment 6726093
Wow it's a lame version of the confrontation between Daredevil and Punisher.
HAKNkyHQYFyAriUEe5fdfg-320-80.jpg
Obviously the aspiring author here is not very well-read, otherwise he'd know about the litany of martyred early Christians who were literally tortured to death because they continually chose not to renounce their beliefs.
StStephen.webp
Bro is finally confronting whether it's possible for people to believe in and live up to a Christian morality ~2 millenia later. This is groundbreaking stuff!
 
The only people who even pretend to believe the nonsense and lies that come out of his cockholster are grifters like Frei and Barnes and literal schizos like Still-Born.
Frei and Barnes have been really quiet about this lately, and Still-Life seems more focused with fedposting about the various completely unrelated public figures he'd like to kill (and is apparently also writing a book).

An exception might be if it's taking so long to figure out what do with some bullshit "cybercrime" and then they might not want to delay the original case.
I presume what you mean here is that small town police departments might not be very familiar with such crimes, and may refer them as "bullshit" out of frustration. Possibly having to bring in one of them fancy city folk cyber-inter-space-net experts to explain to them what to do.

Otherwise, I wouldn't consider what apparently happened here to be bullshit. What Nick allegedly did with Aaron's online account is rather disturbing. It's further proof of how unhinged Nick is. He's basically Captain Ahab, and Aaron is his white whale.
 
But it would be the same DA. The Cops don't make the plea deals. The DA does. Unless the Aaron hacking stuff is being handled by the other county.
*ackshually:

It's not a DA in state courts in MN; it's a County Attorney (or Assistant County County, as the case may be). There are 87 County Attorneys in MN.

County Attorney for Stearns is Janelle Kendall (Kari Dahlen is the Asst County Atty on the revenge porn charge). County Attorney for Kandiyohi is Shane Baker (Kristen Pierce is the Asst County Atty for the Rekieta drug, etc., charges).

The only thing close to a "District Attorney" in MN is the (Federal) U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota, Andy Luger. This position is generically referred to as a U.S. Attorney, or "USA."
 
I think the hacking stuff is being handled by Sterns County right now. Aaron has been in touch with Sterns County. Including St. Cloud popo. Melton even admitted recently that he's been contacted by Sterns County.

We might be headed for a situation where Nick settles his accounts with Kandiyohi, only to get a knock on the door from Sterns.

That would be funny.

EDIT: Wrong city.
Are you guys just coping and sneeding or is there ANY evidence that the police are seriously investigating Aaron's report?
 
Has Nick gotten any court-related Ws that could actually help his case? While nice, getting your kids back after a CPS case closes isn't surprising. There's been more Denies here than The International.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Wow it's a lame version of the confrontation between Daredevil and Punisher.
View attachment 6735301
Obviously the aspiring author here is not very well-read, otherwise he'd know about the litany of martyred early Christians who were literally tortured to death because they continually chose not to renounce their beliefs.
View attachment 6735316
Bro is finally confronting whether it's possible for people to believe in and live up to a Christian morality ~2 millenia later. This is groundbreaking stuff!
“The earth has been filled with the blood of the martyrs as with seed, and from that seed have sprung the crops of the church. They have asserted Christ’s cause more effectively when dead than when they were alive. They assert it today, they preach him today; their tongues are silent, their deeds echo round the world. They were arrested, bound, imprisoned, brought to trial, tortured, burned at the stake, stoned to death, run through, fed to wild beasts. In all their kinds of death they were jeered at as worthless, but ‘precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of his saints’”

-St. Augustine of Hippo


Regardless, this Daredevil rip off is insane and dumb. And just like when Matt pulls the trigger it proves nothing. Now I'm no priest or theologian, so take this with a grain of salt, but I believe that its a mortal sin to murder, but I think that someone actively torturing priests is a completely valid target for a perfectly justifiable homicide.
 
Has Nick gotten any court-related Ws that could actually help his case? While nice, getting your kids back after a CPS case closes isn't surprising. There's been more Denies here than The International.

The CPS case didn't "close". Nick (likely) followed the plan negotiated with CPS and got custody of his kids back at the end of just about six months. And six months is just about as long as CPS can usually keep the kids away without CPS doing more drastic things in court. Keeping the kids away for the whole six months means that either (a) the parents are non-cooperative with the CPS plan or (b) they are total shit parents but not so evil that custody can be removed from them.

The idea of CPS cases "closing" definitively forever at a point in time is a self-serving idea that comes from Nick. And Nick is a habitual liar. Nick has continuously lied about everything to do with family court and CPS since he was arrested.

The last "win" Nick probably got in court was getting the family court records related to his family made non-public.
 
Or if they want to fuck Nick so bad they figure out a way to try him on the second crime(s) so he can have priors for sentencing on that one. (Not sure if this could happen in Minnesota.)

Indeed it could, because Minnesota's definition of priors for purposes of sentencing hinges not on the date that the prior offense was committed nor even its date of conviction, but instead the date on which the prior offense's conviction reached its own sentencing. This often produces counterintuitive results where even the latter of two offenses could be treated as a "prior" in sentencing for the earlier offense, merely due to happenstance of which case proceeds to sentencing more swiftly than the other:

"The phrase 'before the current sentencing' means that in order for prior convictions to be used in computing [a] criminal history score, the felony sentence for the prior offense must have been stayed or imposed before the sentencing for the current offense." Minn. Sent. Guidelines cmt. II.B.101. Thus, an offender's conviction of an offense committed subsequent to the current offense, but sentenced prior to the current sentencing, is properly included in the defendant's criminal-history score. State v. Best, 370 N.W.2d 691, 696 (Minn. App. 1985).

In support of his assertion that his criminal-history score was miscalculated, Mondry relies on an order opinion of the Minnesota Supreme Court that, in the interests of justice, remanded with instructions to re-sentence without including a prior felony sentence in the criminal-history score. See Scott v. State, No. C1-99-2093 (Minn. Oct. 26, 2000) (order). The parties in Scott negotiated a plea agreement based on the parties' assumption that the offender would be sentenced in Ramsey County prior to being sentenced for an unrelated offense in Washington County. Id. When the sentencings did not occur in the order contemplated, the defendant received a longer sentence in the case from Ramsey County than anticipated based on his criminal-history score, which included the Washington County offense. Id. The Scott court's ruling honored the terms of the plea agreement, which, due to circumstances beyond the parties' control, were negated by operation of the sentencing guidelines. Id. Unlike the facts presented in Scott, Mondry's sentence did not contravene the negotiated plea agreement. Rather, Mondry's sentence was determined by proper application of the sentencing guidelines.

Mondry argues that remanding his sentence is consistent with the plain language of the sentencing guidelines, which provides that "[m]ultiple offenses are sentenced in the order in which they occurred." Minn. Sent. Guidelines II.B.1; see also Minn. Sent. Guidelines cmt. II.A.02 (providing that "the date of [the] offense determines the order of sentencing with multiple convictions"). Examination of the commentary to the sentencing guidelines, however, leads to a different conclusion. The order in which offenses occur becomes relevant under the sentencing guidelines when the offenses are being sentenced on the same day before the same judge. Minn. Sent. Guidelines cmt. II.B.101. "When multiple current offenses are sentenced on the same day before the same judge, sentencing shall occur in the order in which the offenses occurred. The dates of the offenses shall be determined according to the procedures in II.A.02." Id. (emphasis added); see also State v. Hernandez, 311 N.W.2d 478, 481 (Minn. 1981) (holding that, when sentencing a defendant on the same day for three convictions from separate courses of conduct, the district court properly considered the first two convictions in determining the criminal-history score for the third conviction). But the sentences for the North Dakota offenses were not imposed by the same judge on the same day as the Minnesota offenses.

State v. Mondry, 682 N.W.2d 183, 184-85 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004)

So don't take the plea deal Nick, it's all a TRAP! Kandiyohi County is just trying to lure you into sentencing ASAP so that their buddies in Stearns County can then swoop in and throw the book at you with a sentenced prior already locked in. You're too smart to fall for their tricks, you need to FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT and get into trial evidence all that bodycam footage that proves the cops LIED!
 
Last edited:
The CPS case didn't "close". Nick (likely) followed the plan negotiated with CPS and got custody of his kids back at the end of just about six months. And six months is just about as long as CPS can usually keep the kids away without CPS doing more drastic things in court. Keeping the kids away for the whole six months means that either (a) the parents are non-cooperative with the CPS plan or (b) they are total shit parents but not so evil that custody can be removed from them.

The idea of CPS cases "closing" definitively forever at a point in time is a self-serving idea that comes from Nick. And Nick is a habitual liar. Nick has continuously lied about everything to do with family court and CPS since he was arrested.

The last "win" Nick probably got in court was getting the family court records related to his family made non-public.
To add to this, cases don't "close" per se. Either the allegations are accurate or they're unfounded claims.

In cases where the allegations match up with the reality, even if it's something minor, CPS will make a plan with the parents for addressing the issue. This can include home visits, the children being put into therapy, the utilization of social programs, etc.
Really depends on what the allegations are. As an example for environmental neglect the family may be subjected to planned and unplanned visits over a period of time to check on the cleanliness and to take the kids aside to chat with them. In drug cases they might need to do outpatient or attend meetings and have a professional or someone who is qualified to sign off for them verify that they're meeting the requirements. In addition to this, schools and other individuals who are close to the children will be approached. A family can pick a handful of references as well if CPS asks for them.

If the family is compliant and follows through with the outlined plan, CPS will close the case. But it doesn't make it go away. It will be filed under "founded" and will absolutely come up again especially if CPS is back again for a similar investigation.

In the event that they are called out again and there's no evidence, an accusation will be noted but it will be considered unfounded.
In cases where it's the first offense and nothing is found, no records will be formed outside of the initial contact & deeming of something unfounded.

So if Nick gets caught doing the same shit again after going through the CPS process they will not be as lenient. That's if they have decided not to press charges. It's kind of a grey area since Nick wants to keep those records sealed. We don't know what actually went down so we can only speculate based on the information given.

My interpretation is that the allegations were obviously founded and the kids were taken, since it was a first offense and the Rekietas have money they were more lenient about their stipulations. They were following a strict schedule of drug tests, outpatient therapy, and requirements to maintain the house. Extended family was called in to be part of the agreement to help Kayla and Nick get their shit together. CPS may also require that April is no longer considered a caretaker for the children.

But again, these are just guesses.
 
Are you guys just coping and sneeding or is there ANY evidence that the police are seriously investigating Aaron's report?
Aaron claims they are.
Melton claims they are.
Sean seems to believe they are (he can correct me if I'm wrong).
Nick, I don't think, has confirmed or denied.

And while I realize that's less than optimal in terms of proving anything, it's about as good as you're gonna get for a while, probably.

Remember, nobody here knew there was a serious investigation against Nick until his mugshot was spotted on the Kandiyohi County jail roster.
 
Except, especially lately, almost everything he says is completely wrong and no practicing lawyer, and not even most laypeople, would fall for his insanely dumb bullshit. The only people who even pretend to believe the nonsense and lies that come out of his cockholster are grifters like Frei and Barnes and literal schizos like Still-Born.
does he not even have the ability to out legal trivia a layperson? how the fuck did he get anywhere? i kinda just skimmed over nicks entire life because i assumed it was of little to no value. at this point the parents need to cut him off or failing that just accept that hes a failure and just pay for him to exist without a pretense he contributes to society. i apologize for pushing the misinformation that nick was in some way competent i had vague probably imagined memories of some alog getting some small detail of the legal process slightly wrong or something but that was probably actually other kiwis correcting them now that i think about it.
April never says "telling the truth to them" in so many words. It's not fooling anybody but that's the kind of technicality you might latch onto to walk back your slampiece's insane admission that your version of The Talk begins:
yeah but she also adds she will continue "telling the truth" for the kids to find so if youre leaving tweets that you know the kids will see and then having it confirmed to you by nick or the kids they heard then youre still talking to them youre just being a retarded faggot who thinks they found a trivial technicality when you actually havent even managed that. like if you tell a kid you sucked their dads balldo online its still conveying that info to them except with slightly more inconvenience to yourself.

can we just lobby the government to euthanize nick? like some retarded dog. it seems like he cant even function i bet he pisses and shits himself at this point
 
Back