Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

[X-avier cuck]

You know, considering the recent allegations against Jay Z and Beyonce.. it makes you wonder if having them at the premiere of a children's film is a good idea for publicity sake?

 

[AnOminous]

You know, considering the recent allegations against Jay Z and Beyonce.. it makes you wonder if having them at the premiere of a children's film is a good idea for publicity sake?

Disney openly supports child grooming. They opposed a bill against it in Florida.

 

[Zaryiu2]

Hunchback 2 isn't good but it not the worst either, it's definitely inferior to the first one and an unnecessary sequel but there were worse direct to video sequels and Disney makes worse stuff these days

 

[Doctor of Autism]

Hunchback 2 isn't good but it wasn't there, it's definitely inferior to the first one and an unnecessary sequel but there were worse direct to video sequels and Disney makes worse stuff these days

To be fair, it is a really shit movie and Disney's animation studio didn't really release anything that is Chicken Little levels of atrociousness until Wish

 

[Zaryiu2]

To be fair, it is a really shit movie and Disney's animation studio didn't really release anything that is Chicken Little levels of atrociousness until Wish

I read that the writing in Moana 2 was comparable to that in Wish in term of quality

 

[starborn427614]

Hunchback 2 isn't good but it not the worst either, it's definitely inferior to the first one and an unnecessary sequel but there were worse direct to video sequels and Disney makes worse stuff these days

The most interesting thing about it is that Hayley Joel Osment plays Phoebus and Esmeralda's kid. It wouldn't be the last time he'd show up in Paris.

 

[John.Doe]

They wanted to capitalize on the success of The Joker but they didn't understand what made the first movie work and also wouldn't dare portray a woman as an evil lunatic so they tried to make it a girl power movie. Kind of ironic that they said Joker was idolizing murderer incels yet they made a movie trying to justify why a woman would want to skin puppies.

Agreed, the comparisons to Joker are pretty laughable. The point of Joker was to have the audience sympathize with Fleck, as he is a pathetic, damaged man - a wounded animal really. He's never portrayed as cool or admirable, he isn't put on a pedestal.

Cruella is all about showcasing how 'cool' and 'powerful' she is, showcasing her as a total 'girlboss' to be emulated and admired. She is put up on a pedestal, and combined with the ridiculous plotting and her batshit behavior makes it impossible to empathize or connect with her as a character.

This reminds me of how assmad Alan Moore got that people liked Rorschach for the "wrong" reasons. A major difference is Moore is basically a dick to everyone so it's not like him bitching about something like that is out of character, plus he's never been a gargantuan retard enough to burn down a successful franchise because he didn't like how people liked it.

Like many rootless liberals with no moral center or conscience, Moore is a consequentialist. The ends always justify the means, and they always know the best means for the best outcome so everything they do is completely justified, QED. Moore actually puts this on Veldt in a nuanced and realistic way, but is incapable of seeing the same in himself or recognizing the validity of the opposite position that holds to a constant moral position. Instead of addressing the actual substance of such a position in general, or critiquing the specifically violent individual stance of Rorschach, he chooses to simply discard it out of hand as having any validity. Only the various degrees of the consequentialist attitude from Night Owl, SS, the Comedian, et al are addressed by his direct text and post-publication commentary. He doesn't even consider alternative viewpoints of having the potential of being legitimate, only perversions of his own mutable morality. In Moore's view, it is all about the 'end' and what is determined to be a 'good end' with the justification flowing from it. Veldt wants world peace, which is obviously a good (if nigh-impossible) goal, so the only arguments Moore thinks valid are about the effectiveness of Veldt's methods - which is why Owl and Specter's only complaint is doubt that it might work long term. From Moore's POV, Rorschach has the goal of virtue signaling because he doesn't accept that 'doing what you believe is morally right' is an intrinsic goal, Moore (and his fellow liberals) can only see Rorschach's actions from their own narcissistic perspective where the goal is to build credibility among certain circles (for Rorschach, his 'crazy conservative right wing' pals) and in the balancing part of Moore's mind getting updoots is less important than world peace. It makes complete sense from Moore's POV, which completely ignores any validity of intrinsic morality.

 

[AnOminous]

From Moore's POV, Rorschach has the goal of virtue signaling because he doesn't accept that 'doing what you believe is morally right' is an intrinsic goal, Moore (and his fellow liberals) can only see Rorschach's actions from their own narcissistic perspective where the goal is to build credibility among certain circles (for Rorschach, his 'crazy conservative right wing' pals) and in the balancing part of Moore's mind getting updoots is less important than world peace. It makes complete sense from Moore's POV, which completely ignores any validity of intrinsic morality.

I totally don't buy this, because Rorschach's last act was completely not self-directed. It did nothing whatsoever for him. And if you want to talk about intrinsic morality, Rorschach quite clearly rejected consequentialism because to him, the truth was more important than even the survival of humanity. His attitude was fīat iūstitia ruat cælum, "let justice be done, though the heavens fall."

I think he actually pretty clearly articulated a viewpoint he fundamentally disagrees with, and put it in the mouth of the only character in Watchmen really worthy of being called a hero. Nobody else in that whole work was willing to die for his morality. Moore just got mad people actually sympathized with it.

 

[John.Doe]

I totally don't buy this, because Rorschach's last act was completely not self-directed. It did nothing whatsoever for him. And if you want to talk about intrinsic morality, Rorschach quite clearly rejected consequentialism because to him, the truth was more important than even the survival of humanity. His attitude was fīat iūstitia ruat cælum, "let justice be done, though the heavens fall."

I agree with you. I'm saying that Moore is a brain broken weirdo that rejects the concept of intrinsic morality. He thinks Rorschach is just using the imaginary concept as a pretense to posture, since Moore is insane.

 

[Betonhaus]

That new Marvel game where the characters are attractive seems to be getting pretty popular. Jeff the Land Shark has gone viral.

 

[Grand Duke Snowfall]

That new Marvel game where the characters are attractive seems to be getting pretty popular. Jeff the Land Shark has gone viral.

Yeah, I’ve heard good things about it on Xitter. As expected, Reddit is seething over pretty women.

Spoiler

But I do have to congratulate Squirrel Girl for coming back from that trainwreck she was featured in years ago.

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

That new Marvel game where the characters are attractive seems to be getting pretty popular. Jeff the Land Shark has gone viral.

Wasn't Marvel woke or something? One game from Communist Party land comes along and suddenly throwing money at woke Disney is ok again?

 

[King Dead]

Wasn't Marvel woke or something? One game from Communist Party land comes along and suddenly throwing money at woke Disney is ok again?

It's an Overwatch clone (people have pointed out which heroes are carbon copies of OW characters) that's in beta right now, I don't know if you can spend money on it yet or not. Regardless, it's at that early stage of modern competitive games where people try it out and have fun before the meta crystalizes and/or things get nerfed substantially and all the fun gets sucked out. People will still probably throw money at it because one should never underestimate the power of coom, but whether it has any staying power is anyone's guess.

 

[Vyse Inglebard]

Wasn't Marvel woke or something? One game from Communist Party land comes along and suddenly throwing money at woke Disney is ok again?

ummmmm, just let people enjoy things, chud?! /sneed

 

[Betonhaus]

Yeah, I’ve heard good things about it on Xitter. As expected, Reddit is seething over pretty women.

Spoiler

View attachment 6742276
View attachment 6742277
View attachment 6742278

But I do have to congratulate Squirrel Girl for coming back from that trainwreck she was featured in years ago.
View attachment 6742288

Wasn't Marvel woke or something? One game from Communist Party land comes along and suddenly throwing money at woke Disney is ok again?

This is Squirrel Girl in Marvel Rivals

I think they are stopping the woke bullshit and giving people what they want. They do still have some diversity, but it seems they are putting it on the backburner and refusing to let it overshadow making a good game.

These are literally characters you can make porn of (not Jeff tho plz). Granted they probably went overboard in making the men slabs of meat, but I doubt people enjoying the game will complain. I wonder if AureeSFM has gotten his hands on the models yet?

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

I think they are stopping the woke bullshit and giving people what they want.

These are literally characters you can make porn of

I wonder if AureeSFM has gotten his hands on the models yet?

Of course it's about porn.

Look guys! Disney is giving us characters to make cartoon porn! They are finally based and giving people what they want - porn!"

They do still have some diversity,

Awww, not enough characters to make cartoon porn? Disney is still playing Kick the Gooner.

 

[Betonhaus]

Of course it's about porn.

Look guys! Disney is giving us characters to make cartoon porn! They are finally based and giving people what they want - porn!"


Awww, not enough characters to make cartoon porn? Disney is still playing Kick the Gooner.

Rule 24 of the internet: if it exists there is porn of it. And this is comparing it to games like Concord and Dustborn where they made the characters so ugly that literally nobody wanted to look at it. This time they seemed to ask what players actually wanted and kicked SBI to the curb, which alone makes the game worth looking at. If the characters look good, they probably put enough care into the game that the dialogue is probably not annoying and preachy and the fundamentals of the game are solid.

It's more then possible that this was supposed to be a DEI game with really ugly characters, but when like 10 DEI games bombed in a row they told the devs to burn the models and voice lines and start again.

 

[Coo Coo Bird]

Rule 24 of the internet: if it exists there is porn of it.

It's 34, man.

 

[Shroom King]

In many ways, animation is like video games. An entire gen grew up with an ever increasing push to make graphics as close to realism as possible. Many may claim new games worse, but no one really wants to go back to the PS1 either, they just want the new tech of the PS5 to emulate those experiences.

I hate how pozzed the whole video game experience has become today, but I don't miss the following:

Corded controllers.
Non-removable controllers.
Loading screens.
Swapping discs.
Flipping over disks.
Accidentally overwriting floppy disks.
No saves or password system.
No pausing on the controller (eat a bag of shit, Sega Master System).
No pausing, period (eat two bags of shit, Atari 2600).
The fucking code wheel on AD&D Gold Box games.

 

[DavidS877]

No pausing, period (eat two bags of shit, Atari 2600).

Luckily the modders have got you covered