Jason and friends pretend bike lanes will reduce vehicular traffic as people switch to bikes and more efficient transportation and free up the road network (he has, in fact, claimed this in one of his videos). Clearly in Toronto this hasn't been the case, yet Jason will NEVER admit he was wrong.
The issue isn't with the lack of bike lanes, i mean, IT IS a part of it, but what am i supposed to do if i live in a american style suburb and the school is on the other end of this maze of single family homes? A bike lane ain't gonna do shit? Why? Because im not cycling for 1 hour in the freezing cold, and cycling back from school for an hour in sweltering, unmitigated 40+c nevada heat, made worse by the asphalt and concrete everywhere. Sorry, fuck you, i'm driving. Now.Im specifically directing this to hellholes like phoenix, nevada, and when i say hellholes i say it as the literal definition of hell. Tough the same stands for any other american suburb.
Bike lanes ain't gonna fix horrible urban planning, nor the symptoms thereof. This is, hovewer going to get the lowest bidder contracted for said bike path a bunch of money, a grant or two and a pat on the back from the gov't for "fixing" a problem.
Bus, trams, trolleys, may however actually be a good idea, i mean, they are all enclosed, air conditioned self moving vehicles so, maybe? Nope, given how low density US subrubs are, you end up putting a tram/trolley/bus stop everywhere, which means money, so to save money you have top put them more dispersed, but then people need to still bike/walk there which means we circle right back to the start of this reply.
The design of US suburbs as a concept, as a style itself makes public transport unviable, even IF the finances and will is there. The companies operating said public transport just aren't getting their ROI, or very little ROI given the initial required capital, distances and fuel costs.
As i said, the design and planning of US subrubs makes public transport financially unfeasable, so no company/city/state will care about public transport, since, well, it's unfeasable and at a loss. Meanwhile the costs of individual transport (cars) are managed by the individual themslelves, initial capital, maintenance, fuel, that comes out of the person's pocket, and so it isn't the cities/state's/goverment's issue.