Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

[Town Drunk]

The faggot couldn't resist a-logging and has been sperging out hard over Aydin for a while by the looks of it. That's all well and good but I don't see why he has to bring his mongoloid antics over here.

What a totally scitzo, contradictory ramble you found, that makes no logical sense, and just seethes. I forsee much amusement from this person.

He's been shielded by existing in Don Sargoy's shadow for such a long period if I had to guess. I don't really know shit about Dev besides Uzalu calling him a cuck when I hung around Cabal some years back. This seems like a fun thread.

Gamergate dick riders were a dime a dozen. Same with the skeptic/athiest community. Founded a community based on something topical, and never let it go a decade plus later. Beating a dead horse is easier than getting a real job I suppose.

 

[Radola Gajda]

back on topic.

View attachment 6735564View attachment 6735569

I heard term woke right few times. And I have no idea what are people using it talking about. Imo I would use woke right for parties like Britbongstans Tories. They may run on rightwing platform , but once they are in power they push same stuff as Labour. Fag rights privileges? Yeah. Open borders? Yeah. Censorship? Yeah. And they will increase taxes to pay for their pet projects. Despite promising not to.

 

[P5Fever]

Lilith is not a woman, she's his boyfriend, not girlfriend

I was actually referring to Naomi, the alleged girlfriend. But still convinced she’s a beard.

 

[Übertroon]

I heard term woke right few times. And I have no idea what are people using it talking about. Imo I would use woke right for parties like Britbongstans Tories. They may run on rightwing platform , but once they are in power they push same stuff as Labour. Fag rights privileges? Yeah. Open borders? Yeah. Censorship? Yeah. And they will increase taxes to pay for their pet projects. Despite promising not to.

Basically woke has become such a toxic term it's now being used against ethno nationalists.
"Woke right" refers to right wingers who don't believe in civic nationalism and for whom race is an important part of their identity.
It's just a new way of calling right wingers racist and nazis

 

[P5Fever]

Basically woke has become such a toxic term it's now being used against ethno nationalists.
"Woke right" refers to right wingers who don't believe in civil nationalist and for whom race is an important part of their identity.
It's just a new way of calling right wingers racist and nazis

If you have to invent new insults because no one takes your old ones seriously, and you pick even cringier ones, then please do some introspection on how pathetic you are.

Also adopt some age old timeless insults. Faggot, Bitch, and Retard. And they are bipartisan too.

 

[The Fuck's Going On Here]

Basically woke has become such a toxic term it's now being used against ethno nationalists.
"Woke right" refers to right wingers who don't believe in civic nationalism and for whom race is an important part of their identity.
It's just a new way of calling right wingers racist and nazis

Ehhh, from everything I've seen, the ones saying 'woke right' aren't aiming for right wingers in general. Most of them (i.e. NOT Dev) are straight up cheering for Trump and MAGA. So they don't seem to have much of an issue of right-wingers/basic-bitch conservatives.

Rather, the 'woke right' bit is a focus on those specific parts of the right (ethnats, christnats, NRx-ers, post-liberals, whatever Sargon, Academic Autist and his squad are) that are basically trying to go "we'll build a trad society with non-liberal mechanisms and principles", and those mechanisms and principles seem to look an awful lot similar to those used by the Left. But this time, that socialism will definitely work, "because it's trad".

The problem with this is, between the Left poisoning the world 'liberal', the word 'woke' being used so much for the Left that it's effectively tied to them, and fags like Dev or smart retards like James Lindsay sperging out over this issue (ESPECIALLY Lindsay), "woke right" seems to be a very uphill battle. Especially with them also getting people like Dave Smith or Tim Pool going against them (again, Lindsay...honestly, the man may say smart things, but his delivery and interactions with those not on his side is so retarded, he might as well label himself Cassandra at this point.)

Where it coincides with Dev, is as you see, him arguing with Carl over this. TBF, Carl is being retarded as well in his own way(though I'll save that post for HIS thread). As for Dev himself, well, I'll wait and see if he produces an ACTUALLY interesting video based on at least some level of principle or substance....or if it's retarded shit like almost any of his Trump videos. I'm honestly not holding my breath on it.

 

[liam dees]

I heard term woke right few times. And I have no idea what are people using it talking about. Imo I would use woke right for parties like Britbongstans Tories. They may run on rightwing platform , but once they are in power they push same stuff as Labour. Fag rights privileges? Yeah. Open borders? Yeah. Censorship? Yeah. And they will increase taxes to pay for their pet projects. Despite promising not to.

Right now, from what I've seen it pertains to Christians on the right expressing moral disapproval of how sexualised games like Stellar Blade are becoming as an extreme response to the censorious nature of the Establishment and AAA failures in the market. It's a big nothingburger that got some Twitter users mad, probably because they are pornsick and use "freedom" as an excuse to continue their behavior publically and vocally.

My personal opinion is the Christians are right, the "freedom advocates" detract their own argument by tolerating porn addicts, and porn addicts should engage with porn privately instead of sharing it with an air of righteousness and virtue.

Even people like TAL and Vee are raging against Christians with Melonie Mac over this. Yes lots of these Christians are grifters but I think their point is fair. I don't think the horniest Hollywood ever got in the 80s or 90s reached the level of objectification that I've seen some of those angry Twitter users regularly repost on their accounts.

An addendum: I don't think every person against the point is pornsick, I just think it's alarming that quite a few of them happen to repost gooner stuff on the regular.

 

[Drag-on Knight 91873]

It's not just the 90s. Boomers do it too, treating MSM as a trustworthy authority even though if you ask them, they can explain they're biased and lie all the time, then immediately put the TV on and complain about whatever propaganda slop they serve up.

I've also seen the opposite. there's people who deny the 90s ever happened. I try to explain that racism was a non-issue, and only the most out of touch grifters (we used different words then, but the concept was the same) still played the race card and were mocked or shunned for it. This is especially noticible when the right shits it pants in the last few years, with the usual arguments about the right didn't do anything, and after a lot of receipts switch to "they did call for censorship but were justified". Not to derail the thread, but I recently heard Sargon of Akkad claiming that the 90s-00s ideas of liberalism don't work and could never work, basically citing the paradox of tolerance without using that phrase. The option of "things were fine until the government started mass immigration and insane spending" isn't entertained at all.

The 90s are weird in retrospect because of the schism between actual Black culture and Hollywood normies. Hollywood normies were making Black-led shows with WASP characterizations like The Cosby Show and Fresh Prince and Family Matters. That is how normies thought racism was going away. Meanwhile, the niggerization of Black culture started in the 80s and continued into present day unchallenged, which is how OJ Simpson was acquitted and Rodney King dindu nothing.

Obama then chose the side of race hustlers and now we have more racism than before.

 

[Broadside]

I don't know how people never figured out there is no such thing as a based fatty. Their obesity is an outward symptom of their inherent leftism.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

I've also seen the opposite. there's people who deny the 90s ever happened. I try to explain that racism was a non-issue, and only the most out of touch grifters (we used different words then, but the concept was the same) still played the race card and were mocked or shunned for it. This is especially noticible when the right shits it pants in the last few years, with the usual arguments about the right didn't do anything, and after a lot of receipts switch to "they did call for censorship but were justified". Not to derail the thread, but I recently heard Sargon of Akkad claiming that the 90s-00s ideas of liberalism don't work and could never work, basically citing the paradox of tolerance without using that phrase. The option of "things were fine until the government started mass immigration and insane spending" isn't entertained at all.

Never going to work in order for that to happen you would have to shoot every single far left freak in the back of the head and no one's actually willing to do that leftist don't stop until you put them six feet under sadly liberals haven't existed ideologically since the 1900s what you have is now is 100 different brands of communism


no 'cause people on the right like myself are tired of leftist running to the right and subverting it and playing a wheel guard action for the fellow communists you're gonna go in the same shallow grave as every other leftist weirdo.
The white army told the liberals to get bent the term woke right makes absolutely no sense the right has always been ethno nationalist and opposed all forms of homosexuality and sexual immorality

 

[BigGuyOS 6 : Jovial Janny]

Right now, from what I've seen it pertains to Christians on the right expressing moral disapproval of how sexualised games like Stellar Blade are becoming as an extreme response to the censorious nature of the Establishment and AAA failures in the market. It's a big nothingburger that got some Twitter users mad, probably because they are pornsick and use "freedom" as an excuse to continue their behavior publically and vocally.

My personal opinion is the Christians are right, the "freedom advocates" detract their own argument by tolerating porn addicts, and porn addicts should engage with porn privately instead of sharing it with an air of righteousness and virtue.

Even people like TAL and Vee are raging against Christians with Melonie Mac over this. Yes lots of these Christians are grifters but I think their point is fair. I don't think the horniest Hollywood ever got in the 80s or 90s reached the level of objectification that I've seen some of those angry Twitter users regularly repost on their accounts.

An addendum: I don't think every person against the point is pornsick, I just think it's alarming that quite a few of them happen to repost gooner stuff on the regular.

Agree. The "woke" right is an attempt to rebrand the Christian moral right, which has always been anti-porn, anti-drug, against moral degredation, is pro-life, promotes charity, and is openly and unappologetically Christian.
These people are dissaffected liberals driven from the Democratic party, and blame the Christian right for everything they perceve wrong with the Republican party. What they really want is a clone of the old democratic party with a few modifications and so say the only way the right (by which they mean their vision of the right) can win is to abandon Christian moral foundations and support modern degenerate positions like supporting legalizing heroin, gambling, and weed nationally, or moderating to support pro-choice abortion positions.
Now, the reason they think this way is because they are disaffected liberals who are still advocating for their old positions, and they see a chance to oust Christian influence from the Republican party, and they will do that in order to gain power rather than accept Christianity which they spent years fighting against durring their time as a Liberal.

 

[xxs]

Right now, from what I've seen it pertains to Christians on the right expressing moral disapproval of how sexualised games like Stellar Blade are becoming as an extreme response to the censorious nature of the Establishment and AAA failures in the market. It's a big nothingburger that got some Twitter users mad, probably because they are pornsick and use "freedom" as an excuse to continue their behavior publically and vocally.

My personal opinion is the Christians are right, the "freedom advocates" detract their own argument by tolerating porn addicts, and porn addicts should engage with porn privately instead of sharing it with an air of righteousness and virtue.

Even people like TAL and Vee are raging against Christians with Melonie Mac over this. Yes lots of these Christians are grifters but I think their point is fair. I don't think the horniest Hollywood ever got in the 80s or 90s reached the level of objectification that I've seen some of those angry Twitter users regularly repost on their accounts.

An addendum: I don't think every person against the point is pornsick, I just think it's alarming that quite a few of them happen to repost gooner stuff on the regular.

The definition of "porn" that melone uses comes from a generation that suffered severe trauma under the feminist mindset.
They were bombarded with the concept of the "male gaze" that is considered harmful and disgusting.
The claim is that a man who looks at a grand prix girl is pathological and there is an inherent wrongness with it. While in reality it's just a natural and healthy heterosexual thing most men around the world do.
Pornography as in actual penetration and hardcore sex should definetly be something people do in private and not brag about it. But to consider stellarblade or chink gaccha games that are sold over the counter and on censorious platforms, pornography is something that's a very hard sell to most people even to church goers who most likely play some of these games as well.
This is especially true in the age of onlyfans, e-thots and "cyberpunk" penis sliders that seem to get no criticism at all, but take a game with an atractive character, move the camera to focus on the rear and watch how faggots reveal themselves.
As for Melonie Mac.
It is very difficult to take someone seriously that says "I like tomb raider and her outfits" but only if they reveal this much and no further. As if she speaks on behalf of God and God himself is ok with THIS level of nudity and no more.

 

[I was a Teenage “JA”-man]

View attachment 6713533
Why the fuck is he there?

He hasn’t made anything good in the past year this is what he’s been doing when not playing indie slop?

 

[Drag-on Knight 91873]

The definition of "porn" that melone uses comes from a generation that suffered severe trauma under the feminist mindset.
They were bombarded with the concept of the "male gaze" that is considered harmful and disgusting.
The claim is that a man who looks at a grand prix girl is pathological and there is an inherent wrongness with it. While in reality it's just a natural and healthy heterosexual thing most men around the world do.
Pornography as in actual penetration and hardcore sex should definetly be something people do in private and not brag about it. But to consider stellarblade or chink gaccha games that are sold over the counter and on censorious platforms, pornography is something that's a very hard sell to most people even to church goers who most likely play some of these games as well.
This is especially true in the age of onlyfans, e-thots and "cyberpunk" penis sliders that seem to get no criticism at all, but take a game with an atractive character, move the camera to focus on the rear and watch how faggots reveal themselves.
As for Melonie Mac.
It is very difficult to take someone seriously that says "I like tomb raider and her outfits" but only if they reveal this much and no further. As if she speaks on behalf of God and God himself is ok with THIS level of nudity and no more.

Woke Christians complain about bad optics, but the truth is, they themselves are bad optics. Annoying Christian faggots are the reason why the Satanic Panic happened and why they lost that culture war. The consequence being that everyone else is okay with persecuting Christians now.

 

[liam dees]

Woke Christians complain about bad optics, but the truth is, they themselves are bad optics. Annoying Christian faggots are the reason why the Satanic Panic happened and why they lost that culture war. The consequence being that everyone else is okay with persecuting Christians now.

Why do you assume the Christians now are still the Christians then? Sins of the father and all.

In any case, kicking out the Christians would mean the right loses its moral core. Freedom without modesty is exactly what leads to the existence of people like Dev, whose moral purview has big holes drilled into it because "fuck le ebil Christians lol". I think balance can and should be found between both the moral extremes of Trans Pedo Woke Left and Absolute Puritanical Christianity

 

[LovisXVI]

Why do you assume the Christians now are still the Christians then? Sins of the father and all.

It's a religion, it really aught NOT to change (assuming they are operating from some claim to truth). So yes we can and should judge them by what was done in its name in years past, especially since there are people still around advocating for the same and it wasn't terribly long ago anyway. It is like saying that because communists haven't overthrown a major government or started a brutal civil war in the last 40 years that we should just let them off the hook and not judge. Stupid.

 

[liam dees]

It's a religion, it really aught NOT to change (assuming they are operating from some claim to truth). So yes we can and should judge them by what was done in its name in years past, especially since there are people still around advocating for the same and it wasn't terribly long ago anyway. It is like saying that because communists haven't overthrown a major government or started a brutal civil war in the last 40 years that we should just let them off the hook and not judge. Stupid.

Good point. Erm actually there's a difference, communism is bad and Christianity is good, so there.

 

[LovisXVI]

Good point. Erm actually there's a difference, communism is bad and Christianity is good, so there.

I fail to discern the difference between faith-based millenarian ideologies that seem to only scold. There is little difference to me whether it hates on things like Dungeons and Dragons because Gary Gygax was a white straight man or because it is demonic or whatever.

 

[P5Fever]

While this is all interesting, can we get back to the faggot known as ShortFatOtaku?

 

[liam dees]

While this is all interesting, can we get back to the faggot known as ShortFatOtaku?

Well about him, his past five videos have been TikTok reactions and the last one was uploaded ten days ago.
Also it had this title.

Probably a joke, but you never know.
Also these TikTok videos get shit views. I don't think Dev has it in him to make anymore good videos.

EDIT: Just watched the intro and yes, the title is a joke related to the election meltdown TikToks he is watching, as he says it was a folder of videos labelled "Cutting off family and friends".
Also to illustrate how these TikTok slop videos are poison to his channel;

Of these eight videos published within three weeks, only one surpassed 50k views.