Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate

Test Business said:
The sudden mention of this says to me some people outside of the troon-o-sphere Googled her and had some hard questions.
Click to expand...
People like an honest politician, or at least one with an identifiable past. You can't deflect honest questions and redirect them to puff pieces in the industry. I bet the poor sap who asked this--and I bet it's someone who would in theory conceivably vote for Brianna--is going to get blocked if they ask too many questions.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: koos koets
NobodyReally said:
This was her tv interview she did today. She looks and sounds more ogre-like than usual.
Click to expand...

Has John been mainlining Helium?

Also,

Wheres%20the%20beef_zps8ozckxnp.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Sicko Hunter, Portajohn and 18 others
Norvic said:
This is the first time I've ever heard her have one of her lies parroted back to her in public where she is asked to enlarge on it.
Watch her when she's asked about her experience working in Washington:


She stalls in panic ("oh my god, it was so long ago...") then comes back with the only part of it that's true, that she had an internship with Trent Lott.

She's a dreadful liar. If she actually persists with this campaign, the press is going to eat her alive on her fabricated past.
Click to expand...
John's going to be eaten alive, that was such a joke.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Portajohn, koos koets, Patrick Buttman and 3 others
Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. said:
You know, fuck it, I'll be the problematic asshole who says it, you fucking pussies:
She's put on weight. Particularly noticeable in the face.
I'm sure that's somehow our fault too.
Click to expand...
I just assumed it was a ton of makeup like on the SyFy episode.

Bet you anything she's gonna try that "only approved questions" shit again.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Portajohn, koos koets, Patrick Buttman and 3 others
CWCissey said:
I know, it's great innit?
Click to expand...

I haven't been this excited for something in ages.

It's like waiting for a movie to be released in theaters. All these interviews and tweets are the trailers, and the possible future debate will be the feature presentation.
Any man who thinks politics is relaxing is not someone you want to face in a debate. Bri will be destroyed in a spectacular fashion worthy of a film.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Portajohn, krimsonincode, George Wood and 8 others
Gentleburd said:
I haven't been this excited for something in ages.

It's like waiting for a movie to be released in theaters. All these interviews and tweets are the trailers, and the possible future debate will be the feature presentation.
Any man who thinks politics is relaxing is not someone you want to face in a debate. Bri will be destroyed in a spectacular fashion worthy of a film.
Click to expand...

Or at least a dank video that shows Johnny getting ripped a new one in slo-mo.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Portajohn, Patrick Buttman, Count groudon and 4 others
What I am really waiting for is for someone to ask her about Natalie O'Brien, and if in fact Natalie O'Brien was made up, what will be the way Wu reacts. Will she clam up and "REEE" as you all say, or will she claim something along the lines of

"Yes I made her up in an effort to absorb all of the death threats I was getting on my primary account, so I didn't have to read them all"

And yes I am aware that makes little to no sense but I could totally see her justifying making up a fake employee. I could also see her finding some random person named Natalie O'Brien that died in the past year and claiming that she worked for Giant Spacekat before she died. Just spit-balling ideas here in case Wu or Frank are reading this.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Portajohn, koos koets, Patrick Buttman and 3 others
@David_cadbury: That hardly explains the Patreon.

-----

Watched the vid...

3:20: "...Bipartisan FUSStration AT Congress..." (see shitlords? it's not a typo!)

4:00: The most condescending "that is such a good question!" ever spoken to a serious interviewer on broadcast TV.

4:30: "We could sit here and get into technical speak [re: infosec], but..." Please let some interviewer take her up on that. I think some IT publication would be well served doing an in-depth discussion about our technical vulnerabilities and the capabilities of arch h@x0r Jace Comrade.

I'd say Wu's lips are moving and he's saying a whole lot of nothing, but Brianna Wu has no lips, and I would not have sex with him.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: The Nameless One, buke_phalus, Portajohn and 9 others
Particle Bored said:
@David_cadbury: That hardly explains the Patreon.

-----

Watched the vid...

3:20: "...Bipartisan FUSStration AT Congress..." (see shitlords? it's not a typo!)

4:00: The most condescending "that is such a good question!" ever spoken to a serious interviewer on broadcast TV.

4:30: "We could sit here and get into technical speak [re: infosec], but..." Please let some interviewer take her up on that. I think some IT publication would be well served doing an in-depth discussion about our technical vulnerabilities and the capabilities of arch h@x0r Jace Comrade.

I'd say Wu's lips are moving and he's saying a whole lot of nothing, but Brianna Wu has no lips, and I would not have sex with him.
Click to expand...
I'm convinced Wu wrote those questions herself. They were extremely self-mastabatory and she kept going "what an excellent question" as if she was congratulating herself.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: koos koets, Batman VS Tony Danza, Patrick Buttman and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back