Orbiter 🏳️‍🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Is this really the dude groypers watch on a regular basis?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4694.jpeg
    IMG_4694.jpeg
    90.1 KB · Views: 42
  • Like
  • Lunacy
  • Agree
Reactions: The Motorizer, WalterPresson96, fake farts and 8 others
Uber driver reviewer said:
I’m not even mad a little bit. But she should had stayed home.

The dumb bitch went looking for trouble because she has some internalized fantasy where she is a muckraker that can do no wrong. Her fantasy is based on a persona she came up with 25 years ago as some sort of prototype IP2 streamer but with a fuckign wordpress blog. But now she is old and wasn’t ready for trouble when she went looking for it.
Click to expand...
And let me guess...Frank Hassle is a big meanie and Boogie did nothing wrong.
 
Zalbaag said:
Pinesimp telling on himself again.

Even if he’s being ironic, the Church holds sexual intercourse as integral to a marriage because of the primary end of procreation and also the secondary end of uniting the spouses. Husband and wife are called to become one flesh in the Bible.
Click to expand...
It's be one thing if Pinesap was known for trollish humor. But, here we know he's outing himself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WalterPresson96, REGENDarySumanai, Zalbaag and 1 other person
RandomBattles said:
It's be one thing if Pinesap was known for trollish humor. But, here we know he's outing himself.
Click to expand...

If it’s Nick opinion then Pinesap (and the rest of the groypers) hold it as infallible dogma.

If you call the groypers out that they don’t disagree with Nick on anything, their response is, “well, what is he wrong about?”
 
  • Like
Reactions: WalterPresson96, REGENDarySumanai, Big Miss Steak and 1 other person
RandomBattles said:
View attachment 6742103
Click to expand...

Zalbaag said:
Pinesimp telling on himself again.

Even if he’s being ironic, the Church holds sexual intercourse as integral to a marriage because of the primary end of procreation and also the secondary end of uniting the spouses. Husband and wife are called to become one flesh in the Bible.
Click to expand...
It is even more insane because the Church even states and acknowledges (correct me if I am wrong) that the sins of the body (lust, gluttony, etc) all are just natural biological functions and desires taken to an extreme and disordered state. Gluttony is eating far to much and being obsessed with food, lust is sexual desire taken to the point of extreme. This is one of the things that causes immense strife, especially to young men in church, where they are told that the sexual desire they feel (especially strongly at young ages) is actually disordered and wrong. No it isn't wrong, humans have sexual desire. You just aren't supposed to dwell on it, or obsess over your sexual desire. When married you are supposed to indulge in sexual desire with your spouse as that is the obvious outlet for it. Besides, sex with your spouse isn't just about sexual desire, it also builds physical and emotional intimacy that moves beyond sexual desire. Imagine thinking that sex is only for reproduction. Why would God give humans sexual desire as a natural biological function, and then say "all sexual desire is bad." Just an insane position that not even the Church supports.

Of course Pinesap will lean on Aquinas, Augustine, and other Church Fathers as to why sex is bad, but the positions on sex that those Church Fathers held are not the official positions of the Church and they even got rebuked for that. Remember, Augustine said sex was bad because he was a sexual degenerate in the beginning of his life so his view is distorted due to allowing a vice to control him. Aquinas was asexual to the point that the Church says that Angels gave him the Grace of Divine Chastity so you can't take his views on sexuality to apply to the masses because he literally didn't experience sexual desire.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: The Motorizer, Coo Coo Bird, WalterPresson96 and 12 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back