Careercow Alyssa Mercante / beerandfeminism / kombitchaTEArex / High Heeled Gamer / hayy GIRL hayy / uhLyssa15 - From failed sex worker to failed clickbait journalist. A far-left racist narcissistic abusive smug feminazi. Stalks her targets and their families, DEI & SBI activist, alcoholic junkie, threatens gamers & YouTubers to public fights and then lawsuits.

Should this thread be moved to Beauty Parlor?


  • Total voters
    473
  • Poll closed .
You can probably own Pat the NES Punk by calling him something even remotely mean, he looks like he would fold instantly.
View attachment 6743478
Funny story, i was blocked by him, he had a video with the long haired freak where they discuss that emulation is so bad because it's stealing money from the creators, i mentioned that when the market sells used copies of games they don't pay the creators, so that idea is pretty moot (unless you count brand new games but hey, we can't even buy games now, only lease it) and some guys agreed with me on the Youtube comment section (everybody clapped!) and boom, a block.
 
Funny story, i was blocked by him, he had a video with the long haired freak where they discuss that emulation is so bad because it's stealing money from the creators, i mentioned that when the market sells used copies of games they don't pay the creators, so that idea is pretty moot (unless you count brand new games but hey, we can't even buy games now, only lease it) and some guys agreed with me on the Youtube comment section (everybody clapped!) and boom, a block.
Hey, at least the long haired dude he does podcasts with isn't a tranny, just someone who owns a used game store.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: deeman
  • Like
Reactions: behindyourightnow
Not really good, he's blocked everyone who mentioned he's racist town and after a week of pure panic trying to "joke" about that but still blocking
Guess what? Happy Holidays! A Dave Rivera thread is now on Prospering Grounds and is currently under construction.
 
Like I said. Under construction. But you're welcome to post it if you have it saved.
Of course but i don't had archive, only link. https://x.com/airbagged/status/1812258640864391515
1734001548104.png

And yes, that's just funny
1734001654626.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slangoddess
So possible reasons(s) for buying out her contract early
A) incompetence
Next we have her being cast as a thirsty anti semite to her bosses, I really don't see any evidence of JT even trying to twist her words or cast in her in that direction though
B)Jew hater ad killer
Next up and I think she wants to expand on this in court is her perceived connection to sweet baby inc was possibly cited by G/O during her buyout
C) conflict of interest as an editor
D) Repeatedly bringing her private life to work
E) Implicating her employer in her private feud with content creators

Those two above are in my opinion the most likely reasons for firing her. She did considerable harm to Kotaku as a brand and she implicated her at the time employer in the threats of lawsuits against people she disliked.

No sane company wants a fucking retard like her dragging your company into a lawsuit that could end with your company being liable for damages she caused, because you did not distance yourself from her in a timely manner.

Even now it could be argued that Alyssa was allowed to exploit her position at Kotaku and the resulting attention to intimidate and harass someone. If she had not held that title as "Editor", she would have been much less relevant. Not putting a stop to her behavior, while flaunting her employment at Kotaku, could be considered silent approval. She has become a financial and legal liability and had to be cut.

SmashJT and his omega-boring cringe website and hyperbole garbage videos that stretch 10sec of content into 10 minute rambling snooze fests were not the cause of her firing. He is just a reposter, react monkey and has the investigative abilities of a wet pizza box.
 
The lawsuit reads like a Kotaku article lol. This might come as a shock to you Alyssa but the judge isn't interested in reading overdramatized whining that looks like it belongs in a young adult novel. When you put shit like
That was intentional.
as a separate paragraph, his reaction won't be to gasp and immediately award you $6 million in punitive damages. He will simply think you're a glorified pro se retard when you supposedly have an attorney writing this shit for you.

If I were to interpret this extremely charitably I'd guess she's trying to bait JT into defending himself and acting equally retarded, but if he hires any real lawyer at all, this lolsuit will inevitably go out the window.
 
D) Repeatedly bringing her private life to work
E) Implicating her employer in her private feud with content creators



Even now it could be argued that Alyssa was allowed to exploit her position at Kotaku and the resulting attention to intimidate and harass someone. If she had not held that title as "Editor", she would have been much less relevant. Not putting a stop to her behavior, while flaunting her employment at Kotaku, could be considered silent approval. She has become a financial and legal liability and had to be cut.
Yeah while a combination of factors I forgot that smash JT made a big effort in contacting Kotaku over her dming his wife it seems his efforts were more successful than everyone initially thought. It's also pretty clear in hindsight she viewed Kotaku as a stepping stone (to god knows what there's like 300 employed gaming journos in the world) I have to imagine there are one or two people at G/O she does not want testifying
 
That is really her only in here, and if the court decides to entertain this case, it will be solely on the legal status of Cam Whores. Are they in fact sex workers, and thus can be called prostitutes in public? While I don't think there is much case law on Cam Shows specifically, there is plenty on strip clubs and pronographic video. Which all firmly holds that yes, cam shows are sex work and thus a form of legal prostitution regulated by the States.

How the State of New York chooses to interpret this, and the Eastern District of New York itself in its precedents will be critical. And this is outside my knowledge. But I would expect her claim that being a cam model is not the same thing as being a Prostitute will face an uphill climb.

That won't be an issue because she has admitted to doing "sex work" in the past and only changed her tune recently:

GdQolW0W4AA1WVX.png

(Apparently it's archived somewhere, but I can't find it right now)

She seems to have gone back and deleted a lot of her old "sex work" tweets in preparation for the lawsuit.
 
I don't know much about law, if anything. But I feel like the courts would press her about her sexual proclivities. She would be under oath, if she were to lie about her sexual activities, pleasure or otherwise, then that's perjury. Law kiwis are free to correct my minimal knowledge of the law.
 
I know im probably late but here's a local archive of the video she posted to tiktok, saw people posting screenshots of the vid but couldn't find who posted it if it was already posted.
Also I'm almost positive this video could be used against her in court for the defendant but I could be wrong.
View attachment 6742717

I can't get over how brain rotted and stupid this dumb ass is that she cannot show a shred of discretion because internet clout is everything to her. Of course this will be used against her and I hope she gets counter sued and losses spectacularly.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Hateocracy
Back