UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson fatally shot outside Hilton hotel in Midtown in targeted attack: cops - Just Part and Parcel of visiting a Big City

1734038962446.png
i really hope they don't rely on the hostel photo in court, because the first one clearly doesn't look like him, the backpack is the wrong color as well. the smiler looks more like him, but still not a positive id.
Juliette Kayyem, former assistant secretary for policy at the US Department of Homeland Security, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that his background in technology may have helped him evade capture for nearly a week.

"This was someone who was studying how law enforcement and how these cities try to protect themselves, which is essentially they have lots of cameras around," she said.

"Now that we know a little bit about him - that he's a smart person, he went to great schools, he had higher degrees, he studied engineering technology, he was into electronic gizmos - some of it is beginning to make sense," Kayyem said.

"gizmos"
yeah, this bitch really shouldn't be speaking on technology. i think its elementary to avoid cameras after a crime.
 
It's so funny that Laura Loomer and the talking TV heads said that the criminals at his prison don't like a "CEO Killer" yet the inmates at his prison are saying "Free Luigi" and saying his conditions suck.
All the drug dealers I know are super concerned with the well being of the rich and powerful. Not a single one of them comes from poor families that have been scammed by insurance. They also love lawyers, politicians and cops.

I'm interested in seeing what the rules are for the case assuming luigi survives and the media isn't laying the groundwork for a shanking where all the cameras magically malfunction and the guard is asleep. Prosecution will probably try to forbid talking about the parasites work or actions. Proving the motive and premeditation will be objection after objection. Friendly reminder to all NY kiwis "I don't really follow the news or social media. I just do my own thing". Is much better than pretending you have no opinion on certain events if you don't want disqualified
 
It's so funny that Laura Loomer and the talking TV heads said that the criminals at his prison don't like a "CEO Killer" yet the inmates at his prison are saying "Free Luigi" and saying his conditions suck.

Really goes to show these dumb rich people live in an alternate reality
I really like that it is everyone vs the press. Either he did it and he is a hero or he didn’t and you are wrongly hurting him. Either way, every normal person loves the guy and wants him out.
 
It's so funny that Laura Loomer and the talking TV heads said that the criminals at his prison don't like a "CEO Killer" yet the inmates at his prison are saying "Free Luigi" and saying his conditions suck.

Really goes to show these dumb rich people live in an alternate reality

A fact made extra funny with the media being happy that Syria was freed by a literal terrorist.
Huh, weird, it’s almost like they only care when it happens to one of them in their own backyard, and not when it happens in some shit hole country thousands of miles away that they’ll never have to step foot in…

Corporate media would never do that to us, right guys? Push biased narratives based entirely on double-standards that heavily favor their own profit margins over our own well-being? I don’t feel so good, kiwisisters…
 
Last edited:
One crucial thing to remember in all of this as you watch the legacy media (and some "alternative" media too) trip over themselves to condemn this action and ascribe unpalatable political motiviations to the killer is that the pharma industry is one of their top sources of advertising revenue. The pharma industry is also in collusion with the insurance "health care" industry to drive up prices and profit margins while reducing liability. As a consequence of this, you must not trust the legacy media as a credible for any news related to pharma or health insurance matters. You must assume by default that they will be putting a slant on things to not bite the hand that feeds them, i.e. to portray their advertisers in a positive light. This is one of the primary drivers of the "trust the science" rhetoric over the covid vaccines and other pharma industry products.
 
you must not trust the legacy media as a credible for any news
I agree with everything you said here, but this part in particular should just automatically be accepted as an objective fact by now. I don’t know how anyone who isn’t a boomer could still be dumb enough to believe otherwise.
 
Did I not say that the problem was collusion of state and corporate power? Yes, corporations will utilize any advantage. But killing a CEO for being a CEO when there are a thousand lined up to be the next CEO does nothing.

Maybe the next CEO will have a small wiggling voice in the back of their head that yes they can in fact be held responsible.

Momenti mori is very very important.
 
is that the pharma industry is one of their top sources of advertising revenue
YouTuber just got done going through a ‘oh shit, I did not know BetterHelp were lying scumfucks’ phase

All the arseholes have to do is wait for new people to come alone that do not remember what got the advertisers in hot water in the first place.
 
uh oh. Journos leaker her name. Nancy Parker

https://tribune.com.pk/story/251532...eged-snitch-nancy-parker-faces-backlash?amp=1

https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-cul...luigi-mangione-reportedly-misses-reward-money

Like this is so comically evil. Journos had to KNOW what would happen. she snitched and got NOTHING, then she got FIRED and now her NAME is out and open and she is going to be HATED
LMAO imagine snitching to the establishment (and on a hero) because you've got dollar signs in your eyes and then getting your life ruined instead. At least Judas got his 30 pieces of silver.
 
LMAO imagine snitching to the establishment (and on a hero) because you've got dollar signs in your eyes and then getting your life ruined instead. At least Judas got his 30 pieces of silver.
Hot take: I reckon she'd have liked the money but it wasn't the primary motivator.

There's a certain type of person who inherently would have the attitude of "he broke the law, breaking the law is wrong, so he must be punished". And I don't mean in the sense that she had a deep seated revulsion to him shooting a man. I reckon it's as simple as "anyone who breaks the law should be punished because breaking the law is bad".
 
It turns out libtards are not actually any less enthusiastic about this murder. And you have his cellmates getting news interviews essentially to hype the guy up. A good group of people to agree with, for sure.

Turns out he wasn’t even a United Healthcare policyholder. And in his hastily assembled r/ChapoTrapHouse manifesto his grievance was with the care he actually did receive.

People are bending over backwards, like claiming be was provoked by being kicked off his parent’s policy at 25, to explain a crime probably caused by psychedelics damaging his brain.

When the logic of the crime falls apart they talk about the symbolism of the crime. Which is code for wanting to enjoy vicarious revenge. The ideology is window dressing for this fact. Hence kiwis making an unlikely alliance with the aforementioned scum of the earth.
 
Hence kiwis making an unlikely alliance with the aforementioned scum of the earth
I think you'd be surprised at how politically diverse KiwiFarms is. I roll my eyes when I hear it described as a "far right forum" because many threads don't have anything slightly resembling that atmosphere.
 
I think you'd be surprised at how politically diverse KiwiFarms is. I roll my eyes when I hear it described as a "far right forum" because many threads don't have anything slightly resembling that atmosphere.
Some of these brainlets sincerely write like a subreddit allied with a group text and are going to war against another forum that's allied with a mailing list. What a lack of coherent political analysis and a steady diet of culture war does to a mfer.
 
Back