Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.
A little shaky? Alan Rickman wrote in his journal that Emma's acting began to fizzle upon entering adolescence.
Looking at the first movie again, Emma would OVAH AH-NOuncIaTE her words in a way that didn't seem precocious but rather seemed like English wasn't her first language and she was overcompensating. Daniel and Rupert were mediocre as well, Emma is just worse. It's awful when the main trio are visibly the worst actors in the franchise. If Harry Potter is getting a new reboot, it should be animated. That way, you don't have to be concerned that an actor won't match the book's description or if your child actors can't really act.
 
Looking at the first movie again, Emma would OVAH AH-NOuncIaTE her words in a way that didn't seem precocious but rather seemed like English wasn't her first language and she was overcompensating. Daniel and Rupert were mediocre as well, Emma is just worse. It's awful when the main trio are visibly the worst actors in the franchise. If Harry Potter is getting a new reboot, it should be animated. That way, you don't have to be concerned that an actor won't match the book's description or if your child actors can't really act.
The movies looked good because the design of the props costumes and sets were good and they captured the mood. The child actors were all horrible. Rupert Grint was the least bad. The adult actors and the design saved it. Cutting out good parts of the books in favor of adding dumb new bits was a weird choice too. I have no hopes the series will be any good, but kids will always have the books to read and I’ll at least give it a chance. It’s like with Phillip Pullman’s books- the seeming inability of anyone to make a quality filmed version doesn’t stop them being good books.
 
Oh my god! I didn't realize how much this screeching autist looks like Umbridge!

View attachment 6747469
Bitch has those cray cray Lillie Jean/Laur Trueman eyes.
881685-4b9c17ee00ebca169909701c5.png
 
It looks like that girl sleeps on a restaurant booth bench? I'm not going to watch her videos but she looks like a nervous amateur, not ugly, just someone obliviously making weird faces. On the other hand she could be a real psycho ex-girlfriend type primarily based on those intense bug eyes.

Anyway I'm looking forward to Cormoran Strike season 6, based on the book that supposedly has a "crazy tranny" subplot (idk I didn't read them. Show is good if a little too soapy.) Comes out in just a couple days. Maybe we will see some seething. On the other hand Strike seems to go under the radar of most but the most extreme anti-Rowling trannies because it doesn't fit in with the emotionally stunted, nostalgia fueled hatred of their perceived mommy figure. (And not near as popular as Harry Potter )
 
Strike seems to go under the radar of most but the most extreme anti-Rowling trannies because it doesn't fit in with the emotionally stunted, nostalgia fueled hatred of their perceived mommy figure. (And not near as popular as Harry Potter )

I don't think most troons read for pleasure.

They're only interested in Rowling's other books in as far as they're able to mine them for further ways to prove that she's ackshually a terrible person, ackshually.
 
Anyway I'm looking forward to Cormoran Strike season 6, based on the book that supposedly has a "crazy tranny" subplot (idk I didn't read them. Show is good if a little too soapy.)
I’ll post caps later when I’m not at work, but that’s the funny thing — the tranny in that book is a very, very respectful depiction, if not completely inaccurate to how trannies actually are. Nobody misgenders him, even the narrator, he’s seen as a poor victim and his friend is a complete handmaiden. Robin’s character even chastises Strike for treating “her” too roughly.

But of course, everything is never enough for them. So they turned on her.
 
I’ll post caps later when I’m not at work, but that’s the funny thing — the tranny in that book is a very, very respectful depiction, if not completely inaccurate to how trannies actually are. Nobody misgenders him, even the narrator, he’s seen as a poor victim and his friend is a complete handmaiden. Robin’s character even chastises Strike for treating “her” too roughly.

But of course, everything is never enough for them. So they turned on her.
That particular character was in the second book of the series, I didn't see the TV series but I'd be surprised if he appeared in it because he was such a minor character. I'm not into mysteries, but started reading the Strike series after seeing all the seething on Twitter about the fifth book, which according to them was transphobically all about a killer tranny. But it turns out that it was just one of the suspects who was an occasional crossdresser (AGPesque) serial killer.
I can't imagine how they did the one coming up for TV, because it's about online SJWs and incels united in their woman hate or pickmeism. For the first part of the book, you only see their chats and posts with their handles, and who the actual posters are is only revealed bit by bit. The obligatory murder victim is a woman cartoonist, many of whose fans hate her and want to take over her characters and story. I can't imagine where Rowling could have gotten such an unlikely idea for a story.
It was interesting to me how most of the buzz about it I saw was saying that she was taking a swipe at the left, but at least as much if not more of the story about the right and terminally online incels.
Since the tread is already infected I guess it's OK to say I'm thirsting for the next book which was supposed to already be published, but she had to go back and sort out some plot discrepancy, while also finding a few minutes here and there to backhand people like Silly Hines on Twitter.
Screenshot 2024-12-14 at 3.45.17 PM.png Screenshot 2024-12-14 at 3.45.55 PM.png Screenshot 2024-12-14 at 3.46.36 PM.pngScreenshot 2024-12-14 at 3.46.53 PM.png
 
backhand people like Silly Hines on Twitter.
Sally is impressively unhinged and the rest of her Twitter is the same, from equating all gender-criticals to Nazis, telling feminists to support sex work and lying about the Cass report. Oh and she previously claimed Europeans invented the idea of biological sex and forced the poor POCs to embrace it.

Looks like she and JK had a prior book review exchange and it does speak for itself.
before the Enlightenment there were no female skeletons

I dread to think what her Blue Sky is like since a skim through her Twitter made me feel stupider afterwards.

As for her threats to see someone sacked because of their Twitter posts here's the woman herself on the subject.
 
That particular character was in the second book of the series, I didn't see the TV series but I'd be surprised if he appeared in it because he was such a minor character. I'm not into mysteries, but started reading the Strike series after seeing all the seething on Twitter about the fifth book, which according to them was transphobically all about a killer tranny. But it turns out that it was just one of the suspects who was an occasional crossdresser (AGPesque) serial killer.
Same here, and I really enjoyed reading them.
The tranny in book 2 does indeed not appear in the show, only the woman who was friends with him.

I loved Ink-Black Heart, though I think a lot of people didn't like the online stuff too much (I admit the chat formatting was a bit extra). It's definitely more critical of online incels than of SJW stuff, though the tumblrina spoonie made me laugh.
There isn't even anything about transphobia in the book, I think it was just a random accusation that appears once, but they still tried to make it all about "omg Rowling is totally putting her own grievances in the book and is painting herself as the victim".
 
Same here, and I really enjoyed reading them.
The tranny in book 2 does indeed not appear in the show, only the woman who was friends with him.

There isn't even anything about transphobia in the book, I think it was just a random accusation that appears once, but they still tried to make it all about "omg Rowling is totally putting her own grievances in the book and is painting herself as the victim".
Oh yes- the "transphobic worm!" So hilarious. Since worms are hermaphrodites, the cartoon worm was accused of being transphobic and harmful to non binary kids by a guy who is later revealed to be a pedo.
I thought Rowling had an interesting angle when the far right troll group went after a leftie woman, and one of the ways they harrassed her was by accusing her of misgendering someone, cueing her fellow lefties to pile on her.

In the second book, she deals with transablisim, (BIID), presented with a vulnerable young girl getting taken advantage of and offed, a confused young guy with the hots for Strikes amputation, and an entitled, infuriatingly annoying grifter activist type.

let them seethe

Screenshot 2024-12-14 at 8.28.30 PM.png
 
So someone told you supporting Harry Potter is anti-trans and you want a good laugh at the seething it inspires:


Apparently La Queen de TERF is personally responsible for the US Congress passing a bill that disallows children of military members from getting transgender medical treatments. I assume she bitch-slapped the 81 Democrats (including the House leader) until they complied with her evil ways.

Reminder: no one is taking away your right to sports and toilets. You just have to use the correct ones.
 
So someone told you supporting Harry Potter is anti-trans and you want a good laugh at the seething it inspires:


Apparently La Queen de TERF is personally responsible for the US Congress passing a bill that disallows children of military members from getting transgender medical treatments. I assume she bitch-slapped the 81 Democrats (including the House leader) until they complied with her evil ways.

Reminder: no one is taking away your right to sports and toilets. You just have to use the correct ones.
1000002402.png
Seems like Rowling also personally convinced the UK's government to ban trans grooming chemicals designed for children too? Sounds like she might have some dirt on Wes Streeting and Kier Starmer and managed get this forced this through.

Pre-pooning
33662066508_6b447b7e2d_c.jpg
Post-pooning
TGNR0-3s_400x400.jpg
bafkreic3xzpkq3oyrym5n3wyg2aqch6cgsvv45ggmi2nia2c7molv3ybwq.jpg

She's got a blog website and bluesky filled with this stuff. Have a feeling she may have been a HP fan since it seems to be a sensitive topic.

Bonus repost :)
1000002400.png
 
Sally Hines was Director of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Gender Studies at Leeds before becoming a Sociology professor at Sheffield.

Her previous work highlights include a video entitled "Trans Pregnancy: An International Exploration of Transmasculine Practices of Reproduction"
It did not win a Globe Award.

Yep, she's another fucking pseudo intellectual weirdo.
 
Maybe I just have bad facial blindness or Im just brown so light skin = pretty but she seems kinda cute
The harry potter girl segment is still strong and mostly full of decent average normal-ass women now, cause the troons who didnt just "like the books and the movies" called quits. So now you got mid-30s single women/mothers who still buy HP merch but a bit under the radar. Certainly better than e-girl streamers and femgooners, what have you.

That said, I think it's less that she looks aight and more that she looks homely and "might knit, read HP and love anal". Simple. No linkedin and she does her video essays for fun.
 
I have no hopes the series will be any good, but kids will always have the books to read
I keep saying this about all the various IPs that are being sucked dry and picked clean at the moment: THE ORIGINAL STILL EXISTS. The Lord of the Rings books are still available if Rings of Power makes you salty. 2D animated Disney films are still out there if you hate the remakes. Most of the HP movies were garbage but my teen Potterfag ass did not care because the books were better anyway. If you hate Disney Star Wars*... ignore them. Disney has no power over you.

*Star Wars is a fraught example because George Lucas wanted to "improve" the originals, but... my point stands
 
I keep saying this about all the various IPs that are being sucked dry and picked clean at the moment: THE ORIGINAL STILL EXISTS. The Lord of the Rings books are still available if Rings of Power makes you salty. 2D animated Disney films are still out there if you hate the remakes. Most of the HP movies were garbage but my teen Potterfag ass did not care because the books were better anyway. If you hate Disney Star Wars*... ignore them. Disney has no power over you.

*Star Wars is a fraught example because George Lucas wanted to "improve" the originals, but... my point stands

I can see your point, perhaps, but I am going to have to push back against it somewhat.

The original might well still exist, but that doesn't matter if the adaptation eclipses the original in the popular imagination.

Admittedly, this is a personal example, so I may be a bit too invested in this particular instance, and I really hope that this doesn't just read like me being a sad fucking nerd angry that people are doing their autistic special interest wrong.

But I'm a fan of The Boys comic series by Garth Ennis, and you'd be hard pressed to find anyone else who's actually read that comic online nowadays, because all people know is the TV show. The comic still exists, but people don't read it.

In fact, back when the show started up, there seemed to be this weird push online (primarily from zoomers who weren't around at the time to have read the comic firsthand) to convince people that the comic wasn't very good, ackshually, and that the show was way better.

Now, the comic is certainly an acquired taste and isn't for everyone, but I got the distinct impression that a lot of the opinions people had of it weren't formed by people reading the comic and drawing their own conclusions, but just taking things that they'd heard online as gospel, and parroting those opinions. The old version was bad, but they fixed it. You can tell, because they say retarded shit like this, in YouTube comment sections. And get 12K fucking likes for it.

1000017965.jpg

I mean, Jesus, tell me you've never read The Boys without telling me you've never read The Boys.

The Boys TV show is now in its fourth season, has basically completely departed from the source material entirely. Plot elements from the comic have been abandoned or retconned or ignored entirely, new characters of the showrunner's own invention have been added, and the show on the whole has become little more than the showrunner's personal anti-Trump soapbox.

The fact that this version so appeals to the likes of Jessie Gender, who can release videos with the title 'How People Misunderstand The Boys' while himself misunderstanding The Boys because of the butchered, sanitised version he's been presented with in the TV show is just salt in the wound.


But that's the version your average person thinks of when they think of The Boys now, and it's really sad and disappointing, as someone who read and loved those original comic books when they came out.

The Boys (TV show) exists, AND The Boys (comic book) exists, but I am now incapable of talking about one without fans of the other thinking I'm talking about their thing, and when they realise I'm not, wanting to talk about, and in fact, a lot of the time, insisting on talking about their thing instead.
 
Last edited:
Back